1. Purpose of the breach was to "stop the steal".

2. Stop the steal in this case means to suspend/alter/change the certification of an election via physical presence (This is terrorism).

3. Barricades are an explicit message to not come any closer.

4. She was explicitly told to get back

5. Progressed into the interior through a door

6. Got shot

If they pulled over a black guy on the roadside and told him to not move and he moved towards the officer you'd have zero issue with them being shot, sort out your inconsistencies. Before you tell me "but but but but but the election was stolen", OK, if that is what people sincerely believed whilst "stopping the steal" there ought to have been 50k people there, armed, discharging their constitutional duty to overthrow corrupt government. If not, then the "executioners" (loaded leftist language) were compelled to operate under the assumption that, until proven otherwise, the election was fair, even if there were as yet unresolved questions and challenges going on.

"The other officers didn't shoot" isn't an argument as to whether or not one other officer meets the standards needed to fire, what if for instance one officer saw a knife drawn and fired in some other scenario - the idea that one took action and they didn't all fire together like clockwork from an anime scene is ridiculous.

1. Purpose of the breach was to "stop the steal".

2. Stop the steal in this case means to suspend/alter/change the certification of an election via physical presence (This is terrorism).

3. Barricades are an explicit message to not come any closer.

4. She was explicitly told to get back

5. Progressed into the interior through a door

6. Got shot

If they pulled over a black guy on the roadside and told him to not move and he moved towards the officer you'd have zero issue with them being shot, sort out your inconsistencies. Before you tell me "but but but but but the election was stolen", OK, if that is what people sincerely believed whilst "stopping the steal" there ought to have been 50k people there, armed, discharging their constitutional duty to overthrow corrupt government. If not, then the "executioners" (loaded leftist language) were compelled to operate under the assumption that, until proven otherwise, the election was fair, even if there were as yet unresolved questions and challenges going on.