In absolute check - never. All we can do with surveillance is making effort to lower its impact and dangers it causes. And it has costs.
It is like with law. You cannot eliminate gun violence by forbidding guns. Sometimes that would lower gun supply for criminals (not in USA,too many guns) - but that's all. And with guns cost of lowering it supply to criminals would be taking all guns from law abiding citizens,what clearly makes this deal not worth it. (except for Demoncrap tyrants loving criminals)
Simply similar way - surveillance is usually not worth it. So when I wrote "keeping surveillance in check" as well I could wrote - keeping surveillance minimal.
In absolute check - never. All we can do with surveillance is making effort to lower its impact and dangers it causes. And it has costs.
It is like with law. You cannot eliminate gun violence by forbidding guns. Sometimes that would lower gun supply for criminals (not in USA,too many guns) - but that's all. And with guns cost of lowering it supply to criminals would be taking all guns from law abiding citizens,what clearly makes this deal not worth it. (except for Demoncratp tyrants loving criminals)
Simply similar way - surveillance is usually not worth it. So when I wrote "keeping surveillance in check" as well I could wrote - keeping surveillance minimal.
In absolute check - never. All we can do with surveillance is making effort to lower its impact and dangers it causes. And it has costs.
It is like with law. You cannot eliminate gun violence by forbidding guns. Sometimes that would lower gun supply for criminals (not in USA,too many guns) - but that's all. And with guns cost of lowering it supply to criminals would be taking all guns from law abiding citizens,what clearly makes this deal not worth it. (except for Demoncrats tyrants loving criminals)
Simply similar way - surveillance is usually not worth it. So when I wrote "keeping surveillance in check" as well I could wrote - keeping surveillance minimal.
In absolute check - never. All we can do with surveillance is making effort to lower its impact and dangers it causes. And it has costs.
It is like with law. You cannot eliminate gun violence by forbidding guns. Sometimes that would lower gun supply for criminals (not in USA,too many guns) - but that's all. And with guns cost of lowering it supply to criminals would be taking all guns from law abiding citizens,what clearly makes this deal not worth it. (except for Demoncrats tyrants loving criminals)
Simply similar way - surveillance is usually not worth it. So when I wrote "keeping surveillance in check" as well I could wrote - keeping surveillance minimal and enforcing about it costly security rules which only will lower a bit dangers surveillance causes.
In absolute check - never. All we can do with surveillance is making effort to lower its impact and dangers it causes. And it has costs.
It is like with law. You cannot eliminate gun violence by forbidding guns. Sometimes that would lower gun supply for criminals (not in USA,too many guns) - but that's all. And with guns cost of lowering it supply to criminals would be taking all guns from law abiding citizens,what clearly makes this deal not worth it. (except for Demoncrats tyrants loving criminals)
Simply similar way - surveillance is usually not worth it. So when I wrote "keeping surveillance in check" as well I could wrote - keeping surveillance minimal.
In absolute check - never. All we can do with surveillance is making effort to lower its impact and dangers it causes. And it has costs.
It is like with law. You cannot eliminate gun violence by forbidding guns. Sometimes that would lower gun supply for criminals (not in USA,too many guns) - but that's all. And with guns cost of lowering it supply to criminals would be taking all guns from law abiding citizens,what clearly makes this deal not worth it. (except for Demoncrats tyrants loving criminals)
Simply similar way - surveillance is usually not worth it. So when I wrote "keeping surveillance in check" as well I could wrote - keeping surveillance minimal.