Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

One reasonable explanation is that Trump doesn’t agree with you about Warp Speed not being about the virus. It was about the virus, and as Trump admitted, he was deliberately playing the virus down. On tape. And that it was “more deadly than the most strenuous flus.”

I know that you don’t believe that narrative, but it’s a narrative in which things that Trump has said and is currently saying make sense.

Trump didn’t want to freak people out with a virus he knew was bad, and downplayed it, but then did Warp Speed, got the vaccine, and now wants credit for it, and is blaming people NOT getting his wonderful vaccine on Biden.

That makes sense to me. What actual fact breaks that narrative? Not suspicion, not implication. What is actually, factually wrong with my conclusion?

Trump, right now, calling the vaccine a “lifesaver” and “safe” and taking credit for it, despite him knowing it’s a poison, in order to avert a “years long shutdown” by the Deep State, even though Trump is supposedly coming back to office anyway and could have ended the shut down himself without distributing poison and endorsing it and calling it safe…

That doesn’t make sense to me. You can call it 5D non-linear time if you want, but as long as the world keeps being predictable by 4D logic and decision-making, and 5D logic starts showing actual changes and not just hints and theories, I can’t really justify abandoning 4D logic solely because of an unflattering conclusion being the only viable one.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Because Trump doesn’t agree with you about Warp Speed not being about the virus. It was about the virus, and as Trump admitted, he was deliberately playing the virus down. On tape. And that it was “more deadly than the most strenuous flus.”

I know that you don’t believe that narrative, but it’s a narrative in which thing that Trump has said and is currently saying make sense.

Trump didn’t want to freak people out with a virus he knew was bad, and downplayed it, but then did Warp Speed, got the vaccine, and now wants credit for it, and is blaming people NOT getting his wonderful vaccine on Biden.

That makes sense to me. What actual fact breaks that narrative? Not suspicion, not implication. What is actually, factually wrong with my conclusion?

Trump, right now, calling the vaccine a “lifesaver” and “safe” and taking credit for it, despite him knowing it’s a poison, in order to avert a “years long shutdown” by the Deep State, even though Trump is supposedly coming back to office anyway and could have ended the shut down himself without distributing poison and endorsing it and calling it safe…

That doesn’t make sense to me. You can call it 5D non-linear time if you want, but as long as the world keeps being predictable by 4D logic and decision-making, and 5D logic starts showing actual changes and not just hints and theories, I can’t really justify abandoning 4D logic solely because of an unflattering conclusion being the only viable one.

2 years ago
1 score