Generally, it's a good strategy to NOT refuse, while ALSO putting the burden of proof on them.

In addition, the drug makers themselves say that their drugs have NOT been tested as to effectiveness in preventing the spread of Covid. Let that sink it: these experimental drugs HAVE NOT BEEN TESTED AT ALL FOR THE SPREAD OF COVID. They have ONLY been tested as to reduction in symptoms if someone "gets Covid" (whatever that means).

Since preventing the spread of Covid is the ONLY purpose of requiring a vaccine, they have no legal basis for their demand when they claim they are requiring it to protect others. Taking the drug does NOT protect others. The drug makers themselves say so.

Make them show PROOF that taking the drug will protect others. They can't because such proof does not exist (and probably never will).

Finish up with a statement that, if you do not take the drug, then you understand that, according to the Pfizer study, you will have a 0.71% increased probability of getting a mild symptom, such as a headache, and that if you do get sick, there is no increased risk of spreading it to others, since the risk of spreading it has never been tested by these drug makers.

Most of the people demanding the vaxx are doing it because they are told to, because they are lied to, and/or because they are making money by doing it. NONE of them have read ANY of the studies, and have NO IDEA what those studies do or do not say.

By forcing them to learn (for the first time) that the studies were NOT about spreading Covid, their justification (in their mind) will be gone, and they will not know what to do. It also sets the legal position you need to recover monetary damages if they pursue any action against you, because they will be committing fraud, which carries triple damages (and might also be a criminal act, in some cases).

Generally, it's a good strategy to NOT refuse, while ALSO putting the burden of proof on them.

In addition, the drug makers themselves say that their drugs have NOT been tested as to effectiveness in preventing the spread of Covid. Let that sink it: these experimental drugs HAVE NOT BEEN TESTED AT ALL FOR THE SPREAD OF COVID They have ONLY been tested as to reduction in symptoms if someone "gets Covid" (whatever that means).

Since preventing the spread of Covid is the ONLY purpose of requiring a vaccine, they have no legal basis for their demand when they claim they are requiring it to protect others. Taking the drug does NOT protect others. The drug makers themselves say so.

Make them show PROOF that taking the drug will protect others. They can't because such proof does not exist (and probably never will).

Finish up with a statement that, if you do not take the drug, then you understand that, according to the Pfizer study, you will have a 0.71% increased probability of getting a mild symptom, such as a headache, and that if you do get sick, there is no increased risk of spreading it to others, since the risk of spreading it has never been tested by these drug makers.

Most of the people demanding the vaxx are doing it because they are told to, because they are lied to, and/or because they are making money by doing it. NONE of them have read ANY of the studies, and have NO IDEA what those studies do or do not say.

By forcing them to learn (for the first time) that the studies were NOT about spreading Covid, their justification (in their mind) will be gone, and they will not know what to do. It also sets the legal position you need to recover monetary damages if they pursue any action against you, because they will be committing fraud, which carries triple damages (and might also be a criminal act, in some cases).