Have you watched Lindell's documentaries on this?

The one with Dr. Frank, had some overlap with Dr. Frank's presentation yesterday. That's one overwhelming piece of evidence for election fraud.

There are others, of course, which don't rely on simply 'the machines'/algorithms.

Please do correct me if I have misunderstood you. It sounded like you are skeptical that election fraud occured in a significant enough magnitude to shift the election. (The other possibility I see from your words is that "sure, it occured, but Mike isn't privy to the data that he says he has in regards to the election machines").

Have you watched Lindell's documentaries on this?

The one with Dr. Frank, had some overlap with Dr. Frank's presentation yesterday. That's one overwhelming piece of evidence for election fraud.

There are others, of course, which don't rely on simply 'the machines'/algorithms.

Please do correct me if I have misunderstood you. It sounded like you are skeptical that election fraud occured in a significant enough magnitude to shift the election. (The other possibility I see from your words is that "sure, it occured, but Mike isn't privy to the data that he says he has in regards to the election machines").

Have you watched Lindell's documentaries on this?

The one with Dr. Frank, had some overlap with Dr. Frank's presentation yesterday. That's one overwhelming piece of evidence for election fraud.

There are others, of course, which don't rely on simply 'the machines'/algorithms.

Please do correct me if I have misunderstood you. It sounded like you are skeptical that electon fraud occured in a significant enough magnitude to shift the election. (The other possibility I see from your words is that "sure, it occured, but Mike isn't privy to the data that he says he has in regards to the election machines").

Have you watched Lindell's documentaries on this?

The one with Dr. Frank, had some overlap with Dr. Frank's presentation yesterday. That's one overwhelming piece of evidence for election fraud.

There are others, of course, which don't rely on simply 'the machines'/algorithms.

Please do correct me if I have misunderstood you. It sounded like you are skeptical that electon fraud occured in a significant enough magnitude to shift the election. (The other possibility I see from your words is that "sure, it occured, but Mike isn't privy to the data that he says he has in regards to the election machines").

Have you watched Lindell's documentaries on this?

The one with Dr. Frank, had some overlap with Dr. Frank's presentation yesterday. That's one overwhelming piece of evidence for election fraud.

There are others, of course, which don't rely on simply 'the machines'/algorithms.

Please do correct me if I have misunderstood you. It sounded like you are skeptical that electon fraud occured in a significant enough magnitude to shift the election. (The other possibility I see from your words is that "sure, it occured, but Mike isn't privy to the data that he says he has in regards to the election machines").