Echoing some other posts on this thread: I don't see how there could be a plan given all that we are seeing.

Not believing in a plan does NOT mean one has to stop researching the globalists plots, spreading the word on the evils of Marxism/Communism, protecting yourself and your family.

There have been dissident researchers (of all stripes) before the Q movement, and this struggle will continue with or without Q's plan.

Among the young, there needs to be MASS non-compliance with the vaccine mandates. We need more protests like we are seeing in Europe. We need to start talking in terms of the formation of communes of like-minded individuals.

Dissident researchers must, in my opinion, always utilize critical thinking; we must constantly expand our knowledge and widen our horizons. I understand this .win can ban people for being "doomers," but I think that this move is in conflict with the spirit of the best dissident/conspiracy research. Follow where the evidence leads you.

What's wrong with being skeptical of a supposed plan? Maybe there are other approaches to understanding Globalism/the Cabal that should be taken into account other than what have now become the standard views in the Q movement.

I admire and care about the users in this community. I wish you all the best. But I think something more is needed than "trusting a plan" at this point.

Echoing some other posts on this thread: I don't see how there could be a plan given all that we are seeing.

Not believing in a plan does NOT mean one has to stop researching the globalists plots, spreading the word on the evils of Marxism/Communism, protecting yourself and your family.

Their have been dissident researchers (of all stripes) before the Q movement, and this struggle will continue with or without Q's plan.

Among the young, there needs to be MASS non-compliance with the vaccine mandates. We need more protests like we are seeing in Europe. We need to start talking in terms of the formation of communes of like-minded individuals.

Dissident researchers must, in my opinion, must always utilize critical thinking; we must constantly expand our knowledge and widen our horizons. I understand this .win can ban people for being "doomers," but I think that this move is in conflict with the spirit of the best dissident/conspiracy research. Follow where the evidence leads you.

What's wrong with being skeptical of a supposed plan? Maybe there are other approaches to understanding Globalism/the Cabal that need to be taken into account other than what have now become the standard views in the Q movement.

I admire and care about the users in this community. I wish you all the best. But I think something more is needed than "trusting a plan" at this point.

Echoing some other posts on this thread: I don't see how their could be a plan given all that we are seeing.

Not believing in a plan does NOT mean one has to stop researching the globalists plots, spreading the word on the evils of Marxism/Communism, protecting yourself and your family.

Their have been dissident researchers (of all stripes) before the Q movement, and this struggle will continue with or without Q's plan.

Among the young, there needs to be MASS non-compliance with the vaccine mandates. We need more protests like we are seeing in Europe. We need to start talking in terms of the formation of communes of like-minded individuals.

Dissident researchers must, in my opinion, must always utilize critical thinking; we must constantly expand our knowledge and widen our horizons. I understand this .win can ban people for being "doomers," but I think that this move is in conflict with the spirit of the best dissident/conspiracy research. Follow where the evidence leads you.

What's wrong with being skeptical of a supposed plan? Maybe there are other approaches to understanding Globalism/the Cabal that need to be taken into account other than what have now become the standard views in the Q movement.

I admire and care about the users in this community. I wish you all the best. But I think something more is needed than "trusting a plan" at this point.