Great work OP, first I've noticed it here. I like the strategy in full thus far.

Be wary of advice below however. You do NOT want to involve a BAR attorney if you plan on filing a "Court of Record" (Common Law) case. Gosh, there are so many WORDS that are so important to comprehend (not "under-stand" ----> to "Stand Under". That's one right there, should you end up filing a law suit, you do not wish to "Stand Under" the judge and should thus, never agree that you "understand" him/her.

Lastly for now, you also do not want, nor NEED to "REPRESENT" (Re-Present) your "self". The notion of "Pro Se" is pure British admiralty jurisdiction deception. You ARE "YOUR SELF", you have no need to "Re-Present" that which you already are. Do you see this?

In the admiralty courts, which are basically all of them today, when you appear (make a "general appearance"), you are appearing as a "Trustee" for a corporation (corpse) vehicle. Said "corporation" is a "dead entity", which is all that can "interact" within admiralty court jurisdiction. You may have heard of the birth certificate swindle so I won't elaborate. But this is essentially it. Nowadays there are also "Special Purpose Vehicles" that may be operating behind the scenes (in your name) that you haven't received full disclosure on either. But net-net, when (generally) appearing in an admiralty court, should you be "Pro Se", you are "acting as" a trustee of a hidden Cestui Que Trust, when you should be the BENEFICIARY if you fully understood the deception involved.

In any case, should the need arise for a lawsuit, I'm hopeful the group you're using can properly instruct you on how to file the suit AS as "court of record" Common Law filing. Just including these words (court of record) gets you there, technically speaking. You could use the assistance of a "Counselor At Law", but your filing will be spoiled if a BAR attorney is involved and you'll automatically be drawn into the maritime/admiralty jurisdiction.

To manage your own case, you must realize a few essential things:

1. You're the King/Queen of "YOUR Court"
2. The "judge" in a common law proceeding is really a referee (magistrate - justice of the peace), an arbiter only
3. The "judge" is there only to maintain an orderly proceeding and is NEITHER the decision maker when it comes to the "LAW" or the "FACTS". Because is YOUR court - not the "admiralty's" court. And you're not dealing with statutes, acts, codes, etc., which the "judge" has jurisdiction over". You ARE the "LAW"
4. In short, you are the "King holding court"
5. Attorney are 3rd class citizens in admiralty courts. They bend the knee to "the judge" first, then the BAR.
6. A "Re-Presented" affiant/litigant/plaintiff/defendant is thus then a 4th class citizen - basically treated as an "imbecile" or "ward of the court", unable to "act" within all the complex "Rules of Legal Procedure" - none of which you want, nor need.
7. Attorney's file "complaints" (whining and begging). King's file CLAIMS, which are always superior in to complaints
8. Attorney's file "motions", which are again, begging and pleading a singular "judge", whose opinion TRUMPS all in admiralty courts. The King asserts his facts
9. Attorney's file "summons", as they can only "Summon the Dead" (Cestui Que "Trust" corporations [corpses]).
10. In Common Law, you get a "Jury Trial" where the "Jury of your Peers" gets to decide BOTH the LAW and the FACTS of the case.
11. In an admiralty court, you get a "Trial by jury" (if you're LUCKY!!!), where the judge determines the "LAW" and the jury decides the facts. As such, the JUDGE has plenary power, in every respect, to INSTRUCT the jury to ignore or not consider any "facts" that you may present --- again - allowing a single man/woman to determine the fate of your case. All of the above applies, ad nauseam if you are unable to get a jury - judge's individual opinion for 100%.
12. Lastly, there are no "court of appeals" in a Common Law proceeding, and thus, no endless "legal fees" and ongoing battles, enriching the attorneys and judges ad infinitum.

In short - You, as the "king", which you always are and will be in a Common Law proceeding. You are the BOSS and IN CHARGE of your entire case. It's your "LAW", as you determine is fair and just. It's entirely up to you. All you need to do is convince a "jury of your peers" or your case merits in order to prevail - no singular "Judge" can intercede.

Anyway, hopefully you understand most of this. I could go on and on. You're not at this stage yet, but thought I'd give you a little food for thought in advance.

Glad to answer any questions you may have and help along the way if needed.

Good luck and keep up the great fight!

Great work OP, first I've noticed it here. I like the strategy in full thus far.

Be wary of advice below however. You do NOT want to involve a BAR attorney if you plan on filing a "Court of Record" (Common Law) case. Gosh, there are so many WORDS that are so important to comprehend (not "under-stand" ----> to "Stand Under". That's one right there, should you end up filing a law suit, you do not wish to "Stand Under" the judge and should thus, never agree that you "understand" him/her.

Lastly for now, you also do not want, nor NEED to "REPRESENT" (Re-Present) your "self". The notion of "Pro Se" is pure British admiralty jurisdiction deception. You ARE "YOUR SELF", you have no need to "Re-Present" that which you already are. Do you see this?

In the admiralty courts, which are basically all of them today, when you appear (make a "general appearance"), you are appearing as a "Trustee" for a corporation (corpse) vehicle. Said "corporation" is a "dead entity", which is all that can "interact" within admiralty court jurisdiction. You may have heard of the birth certificate swindle so I won't elaborate. But this is essentially it. Nowadays there are also "Special Purpose Vehicles" that may be operating behind the scenes (in your name) that you haven't received full disclosure on either. But net-net, when (generally) appearing in an admiralty court, should you be "Pro Se", you are "acting as" a trustee of a hidden Cestui Que Trust, when you should be the BENEFICIARY if you fully understood the deception involved.

In any case, should the need arise for a lawsuit, I'm hopeful the group you're using can properly instruct you on how to file the suit AS as "court of record" Common Law filing. Just including these words (court of record) gets you there, technically speaking. You could use the assistance of a "Counselor At Law", but your filing will be spoiled if a BAR attorney is involved and you'll automatically be drawn into the maritime/admiralty jurisdiction.

To manage your own case, you must realize a few essential things:

1. You're the King/Queen of "YOUR Court"
2. The "judge" in a common law proceeding is really a referee (magistrate - justice of the peace), an arbiter only
3. The "judge" is there only to maintain an orderly proceeding and is NEITHER the decision maker when it comes to the "LAW" or the "FACTS". Because is YOUR court - not the "admiralty's" court. And you're not dealing with statutes, acts, codes, etc., which the "judge" has jurisdiction over". You ARE the "LAW"
4. In short, you are the "King holding court"
5. Attorney are 3rd class citizens in admiralty courts. They bend the knee to "the judge" first, then the BAR.
6. A "Re-Presented" affiant/litigant/plaintiff/defendant is thus then a 4th class citizen - basically treated as an "imbecile" or "ward of the court", unable to "act" within all the complex "Rules of Legal Procedure" - none of which you want, nor need.
7. Attorney's file "complaints" (whining and begging). King's file CLAIMS, which are always superior in to complaints
8. Attorney's file "motions", which are again, begging and pleading a singular "judge", whose opinion TRUMPS all in admiralty courts. The King asserts his facts
9. Attorney's file "summons", as they can only "Summon the Dead" (Cestui Que "Trust" corporations [corpses]).
10. In Common Law, you get a "Jury Trial" where the "Jury of your Peers" gets to decide BOTH the LAW and the FACTS of the case.
11. In an admiralty court, you get a "Trial by jury", where the judge determines the "LAW" and the jury decides the facts. As such, the JUDGE has plenary power, in every respect, to INSTRUCT the jury to ignore or not consider any "facts" that you may present --- again - allowing a single man/woman to determine the fate of your case
12. Lastly, there are no "court of appeals" in a Common Law proceeding, and thus, no endless "legal fees" and ongoing battles, enriching the attorneys and judges ad infinitum.

In short - You, as the "king", which you always are and will be in a Common Law proceeding. You are the BOSS and IN CHARGE of your entire case. It's your "LAW", as you determine is fair and just. It's entirely up to you. All you need to do is convince a "jury of your peers" or your case merits in order to prevail - no singular "Judge" can intercede.

Anyway, hopefully you understand most of this. I could go on and on. You're not at this stage yet, but thought I'd give you a little food for thought in advance.

Glad to answer any questions you may have and help along the way if needed.

Good luck and keep up the great fight!

Great work OP, first I've noticed it here. I like the strategy in full thus far.

Be wary of advice below however. You do NOT want to involve a BAR attorney if you plan on filing a "Court of Record" (Common Law) case. Gosh, there are so many WORDS that are so important to comprehend (not "under-stand" ----> to "Stand Under". That's one right there, should you end up filing a law suit, you do not wish to "Stand Under" the judge and should thus, never agree that you "understand" him/her.

Lastly for now, you also do not want, nor NEED to "REPRESENT" (Re-Present) your "self". The notion of "Pro Se" is pure British admiralty jurisdiction deception. You ARE "YOUR SELF", you have no need to "Re-Present" that which you already are. Do you see this?

In the admiralty courts, which are basically all of them today, when you appear (make a "general appearance"), you are appearing as a "Trustee" for a corporation (corpse) vehicle. Said "corporation" is a "dead entity", which is all that can "interact" within admiralty court jurisdiction. You may have heard of the birth certificate swindle so I won't elaborate. But this is essentially it. Nowadays there are also "Special Purpose Vehicles" that may be operating behind the scenes (in your name) that you haven't received full disclosure on either. But net-net, when (generally) appearing in an admiralty court, should you be "Pro Se", you are "acting as" a trustee of a hidden Cestui Que Trust, when you should be the BENEFICIARY if you fully understood the deception involved.

In any case, should the need arise for a lawsuit, I'm hopeful the group you're using can properly instruct you on how to file the suit AS as "court of record" Common Law filing. Just including these words (court of record) gets you there, technically speaking. You could use the assistance of a "Counselor At Law", but your filing will be spoiled if a BAR attorney is involved and you'll automatically be drawn into the maritime/admiralty jurisdiction.

To manage your own case, you must realize a few essential things:

1. You're the King/Queen of "YOUR Court"
2. The "judge" in a common law proceeding is really a referee (magistrate - justice of the peace), an arbiter only
3. The "judge" is there only to maintain an orderly proceeding and is NEITHER the decision maker when it comes to the "LAW" or the "FACTS". Because is YOUR court - not the "admiralty's" court. And you're not dealing with statutes, acts, codes, etc., which the "judge" has jurisdiction over". You ARE the "LAW"
4. In short, you are the "King holding court"
5. Attorney are 3rd class citizens in admiralty courts. They bend the knee to "the judge" first, then the BAR.
6. A "Re-Presented" affiant/litigant/plaintiff/defendant is thus then a 4th class citizen - basically treated as an "imbecile" or "ward of the court", unable to "act" within all the complex "Rules of Legal Procedure" - none of which you want, nor need.
7. Attorney's file "complaints" (whining and begging). King's file CLAIMS, which are always superior in to complaints
8. Attorney's file "motions", which are again, begging and pleading a singular "judge", whose opinion TRUMPS all in admiralty courts. The King asserts his facts
9. Attorney's file "summons", as they can only "Summon the Dead" (Cestui Que "Trust" corporations [corpses]).
10. In Common Law, you get a "Jury Trial" where the "Jury of your Peers" gets to decide BOTH the LAW and the FACTS of the case.
11. In an admiralty court, you get a "Trial by jury", where the judge determines the "LAW" and the jury decides the facts. As such, the jury has plenary power, in every respect, to INSTRUCT the jury to ignore or not consider any "facts" that you may present --- again - allowing a single man/woman to determine the fate of your case
12. Lastly, there are no "court of appeals" in a Common Law proceeding, and thus, no endless "legal fees" and ongoing battles, enriching the attorneys and judges ad infinitum.

In short - You, as the "king", which you always are and will be in a Common Law proceeding, are the BOSS and IN CHARGE of your entire case. It's your "LAW", as you determine is fair and just. It's entirely up to you. All you need to do is convince a "jury of your peers" or your case merits in order to prevail - no singular "Judge" can intercede.

Anyway, hopefully you understand most of this. I could go on and on. You're not at this stage yet, but thought I'd give you a little food for thought in advance.

Glad to answer any questions you may have and help along the way if needed.

Good luck and keep up the great fight!