It depends on how loose your correlation between "abortion" and 40 year old synthesized cells are.

People with no medical experience or knowledge will claim it's aborted fetal cells, outright and that's just not true. There is no tissue used in the vaccine. Period. It's a cell line that has been re-generated in a lab millions of times over. There's really no direct link to the moral outrage of abortion and the fetal cell line.

This isn't a case of direct reaction to an action, i.e if new cells were taken directly for testing.

Claiming "abortion" is a stretch too. The original donor of the cells was medically aborted. Because of unviability. You're not talking about some thot aborting for no real reason here.

If anything, the donors of the original cells have lived a life far more productive than many living humans.

Basically, the abortion route is going to be extremely hard to prove you have a moral exception to. Anyone arguing otherwise is not arguing with a basis in reality. There are many more good, solid reasons to ask for exemption, this isn't it.

It depends on how loose your correlation between "abortion" 40 year old synthesized cells are.

People with no medical experience or knowledge will claim it's aborted fetal cells, outright and that's just not true. There is no tissue used in the vaccine. Period. It's a cell line that has been re-generated in a lab millions of times over. There's really no direct link to abortion.

Claiming "abortion" is a stretch too. The original donor of the cells was medically aborted. Because of unviability. You're not talking about some thot aborting for no real reason here.

If anything, the donors of the original cells have lived a life far more productive than many living humans.

Basically, the abortion route is going to be extremely hard to prove you have a moral exception to.