Its called feudalsim, only its worse than the worst of the Dark Ages, worse than the worst of the days of lords and serfs.

See in yee olde days....

The Lord owns the land he is granted, the Lord is a titled nobility who is part of the government. He has a legal title that grants him this right, to "own" and use a part of the King's land. In turn he is expected to develop this land, deliver the king taxes, and raise a military force to both defend the land, and aid the king in war when its time.

The freemen tenants are leased use of the land in exchange for payment or service to the Lord. They get to keep their profits. The peasants/serfs are in turn legally considered "part of the land" and their lives are lived as property to the Regent or King, they make the least profits, and are legally considered the property of the King.

There is also freemen who can purchase land deeds from the king themselves to set up businesses. And a good bit of other mintua, but you get the gist of it, VERY different from capitalism and private home ownership of today.

BUT....

In feudalism the Lord is also duty bound, honor bond, AND legally bound to provide infrastructure, law and order, AND military defense for the serfs/peasants. Should a lord/baron/duke (many titles for this) fail to preform their duties, and taxes were not collected and paid to the crown, or the lord didn't provide defense to his serfs...he would be hauled before the king and charged with treason, typically punished by beheading.

Yes you read that right, in medieval times, if a high-heeled, "fancy" and "privileged" noble didn't properly serve and protect his peasants, he was beheaded as punishment. If bandits killed the kings peasants, beheading, if law was not maintained and the peasants complained, beheading, if the enemy captured the lord's territory or Vikings/mongols/turks (possibly the French) raided it, and the lord and his knights didn't die on the battlefield defending it, also beheading.

And so while it was a very caste-based system even the peasants didn't hate it when it worked because they got infrastructure, protection, and even economic organization out of the arrangement. They knew in exhange for a portion (like 1/3 of the harvest) they were protected from vikings, bandits, or the French, and in turn got to sell the rest of their crops on market and pocket the difference.

Now lets talk NWO.

What the want. All the privilege's of a lord. Status, massive income, and overwhelming commanding, authoritarian power. They will in turn be bound by NONE of the responsibilities or accountability. They will want the broke, heavily in dept national government to try to field token defense forces. They will not pay a dime to provide law and order, they won't lift a finger or a cent to make infrastructure, markets, or economic systems for their "serfs." They will tax you, charge you rent, and laugh at you as you can't afford anything but soy cubes for food. They don't want 1/3rd of your "harvest" they want to figure out how to nickel and dime you with rents until they have 100% of it. They want to make the money, take everything from you, and then give you NOTHING in return, be accountable to nothing but their own egos, existing in a lawless anarchy at the top.

So what the NWO wants for you is WORSE THAN THE DARK AGES.

I'm not trying to say we should do fedualsim, we should not, it wasn't a nice system. What I am pointing out is that the NWO is going to be worse than being peasant, worse than living in the dark ages.

Its called feudalsim, only its worse than the worst of the Dark Ages, worse than the worst of the days of lords and serfs.

See in yee olde days....

The Lord owns the land he is granted, the Lord is a titled nobility who is part of the government. He has a legal title that grants him this right, to "own" and use a part of the King's land. In turn he is expected to develop this land, deliver the king taxes, and raise a military force to both defend the land, and aid the king in war when its time.

The freemen tenants are leased use of the land in exchange for payment or service to the Lord. They get to keep their profits. The peasants/serfs are in turn legally considered "part of the land" and their lives are lived as property to the Regent or King, they make the least profits, and are legally considered the property of the King.

There is also freemen who can purchase land deeds from the king themselves to set up businesses. And a good bit of other mintua, but you get the gist of it, VERY different from capitalism and private home ownership of today.

BUT....

In feudalism the Lord is also duty bound, honor bond, AND legally bound to provide infrastructure, law and order, AND military defense for the serfs/peasants. Should a lord/baron/duke (many titles for this) fail to preform their duties, and taxes were not collected and paid to the crown, or the lord didn't provide defense to his serfs...he would be hauled before the king and charged with treason, typically punished by beheading.

Yes you read that right, in medieval times, if a high-heeled, "fancy" and "privileged" noble didn't properly serve and protect his peasants, he was beheaded as punishment. If bandits killed the kings peasants, beheading, if law was not maintained and the peasants complained, beheading, if the enemy captured the lord's territory or Vikings/mongols/turks (possibly the French) raided it, and the lord and his knights didn't die on the battlefield defending it, also beheading.

And so while it was a very caste-based system even the peasants didn't hate it when it worked because they got infrastructure, protection, and even economic organization out of the arrangement. They knew in exhange for a portion (like 1/3 of the harvest) they were protected from vikings, bandits, or the French, and in turn got to sell the rest of their crops on market and pocket the difference.

Now lets talk NWO.

What the want. All the privilege's of a lord. STatus, massive income, and overwhelming commanding, authoritarian power. They will in turn be bound by NONE of the responsibilities or accountability. They will want the broke, heavily in dept national government to try to field token defense forces. They will not pay a dime to provide law and order, they won't lift a finger or a cent to make infrastructure, markets, or economic systems for their "serfs." They will tax you, charge you rent, and laugh at you as you can't afford anything but soy cubes for food. They want to make the money, take everything from you, and then give you NOTHING in return, be accountable to nothing but their own egos, existing in a lawless anarchy at the top.

So what the NWO wants for you is WORSE THAN THE DARK AGES.

I'm not trying to say we should do fedualsim, we should not, it wasn't a nice system. What I am pointing out is that the NWO is going to be worse than being peasant, worse than living in the dark ages.

Its called feudalsim.

The Lord owns the land, the Lord is a titled nobility who is part of the government.

The freemen tenants are leased use of the land in exchange for payment or service to the Lord. The peasants/serfs are in turn legally considered "part of the land" and their lives are lived as property to the Regent or King.

BUT....

In feudalism the Lord is also duty bound, honor bond, AND legally bound to provide infrastructure, law and order, AND military defense for the serfs/peasants. Should a lord/baron/duke (many titles for this) fail to preform their duties, and taxes were not collected and paid to the crown, or the lord didn't provide defense to his serfs...he would be hauled before the king and charged with treason, typically punished by beheading.

Yes you read that right, in medieval times, if a high-heeled, "fancy" and "privileged" noble didn't properly serve and protect his peasants, he was beheaded as punishment. If bandits killed the kings peasants, beheading, if law was not maintained and the peasants complained, beheading, if the enemy captured the lord's territory or Vikings/mongols/turks (possibly the French) raided it, and the lord and his knights didn't die on the battlefield defending it, also beheading.

And so while it was a very caste-based system even the peasants didn't hate it when it worked because they got infrastructure, protection, and even economic organization out of the arrangement. They knew in exhange for a portion (like 1/3 of the harvest) they were protected from vikings, bandits, or the French, and in turn got to sell the rest of their crops on market and pocket the difference.

Now lets talk NWO.

What the want. All the privilege's of a lord. STatus, massive income, and overwhelming commanding, authoritarian power. They will in turn be bound by NONE of the responsibilities or accountability. They will want the broke, heavily in dept national government to try to field token defense forces. They will not pay a dime to provide law and order, they won't lift a finger or a cent to make infrastructure, markets, or economic systems for their "serfs." They will tax you, charge you rent, and laugh at you as you can't afford anything but soy cubes for food. They want to make the money, take everything from you, and then give you NOTHING in return, be accountable to nothing but their own egos, existing in a lawless anarchy at the top.

So what the NWO wants for you is WORSE THAN THE DARK AGES.

I'm not trying to say we should do fedualsim, we should not, it wasn't a nice system. What I am pointing out is that the NWO is going to be worse than being peasant, worse than living in the dark ages.