I don't know about graphene specifically but L-Cysteine is basically the same thing as NAC (N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine) except that L-Cysteine is more readily absorbed by the cell.

As for graphene being in the vaccine, I have looked at (I believe) all of the evidence that suggests it is in there, and I have yet to see any evidence that meaningfully substantiates that fear or that stands up to debate.

Maybe I have missed something, but this is not a concern for me atm when there are real concerns from both the Spike protein and the autoimmune response the "vaccine" nanotechnology is intended to produce. Both of these problems are meted out in the VAERS data to substantial extent, thus these are the problems I am attempting to address in my advice.

I don't know about graphene specifically but L-Cysteine is basically the same thing as NAC (N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine) except that L-Cysteine is more readily absorbed by the cell.

As for graphene being in the vaccine, I have looked at (I believe) all of the evidence that suggests it is in there, and I have yet to see any evidence that meaningfully substantiates that fear or that stands up to debate.