Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Please don’t mention Maxwell in this thread. No one is going to forget about Maxwell.

This isn’t just infighting and they’re not just bickering. These are serious real world things be discussed.

I’ve seen a few arguments that Q mentions Flynn and not Lin inside some of these threads.

In light of recent events, have we been looking at this wrong? Q doesn’t mention anything positive about Flynn. Correct me if I’m wrong but it seemed like he came out with Q references and we just all assumed he was what would move us forward. I recall he’s said some things in the past that make you question his motives but everyone always says “disinfo is necessary”. To be honest, this seems like a shill tactic to sweep it under the rug. I’m seeing people still do this despite the full context of the recent conversations.

I’m on my phone and I’ll try to go through each post eventually but the recurring pattern is focusing on his background. Here are some of the posts that I believe can be inferred negatively towards Flynn.

Trump wished Flynn luck when he was sentenced, which he only does towards his enemies. Flynn lied on purpose to get arrested, Q asks why would he do that and calls it a rubber bullet. When do you use rubber bullets? Trump pardoned Flynn and Stone. Tore has everything you need to know about Stone in her telegram channel.

You might disagree with this entire idea but try to look at the Flynn drops without bias assuming that Flynn is infiltrating us instead of the other way around. I think this perspective paints a different picture.

Edit: Here’s the short version. The assumption is that we’ve misinterpreted Flynn as a white hat and he’s infiltrated the Q movement to control the narrative.

https://qalerts.net/?n=1936

https://qalerts.net/?n=1459

https://qalerts.net/?n=1370

https://qalerts.net/?n=1284

https://qalerts.net/?n=953

https://qalerts.net/?n=97

https://qalerts.net/?n=36

2 years ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Please don’t mention Maxwell in this thread. No one is going to forget about Maxwell.

This isn’t just infighting and they’re not just bickering. These are serious real world things be discussed.

I’ve seen a few arguments that Q mentions Flynn and not Lin inside some of these threads.

In light of recent events, have we been looking at this wrong? Q doesn’t mention anything positive about Flynn. Correct me if I’m wrong but it seemed like he came out with Q references and we just all assumed he was what would move us forward. I recall he’s said some things in the past that make you question his motives but everyone always says “disinfo is necessary”. To be honest, this seems like a shill tactic to sweep it under the rug. I’m seeing people still do this despite the full context of the recent conversations.

I’m on my phone and I’ll try to go through each post eventually but the recurring pattern is focusing on his background. Here are some of the posts that I believe can be inferred negatively towards Flynn.

Trump wished Flynn luck when he was sentenced, which he only does towards his enemies. Flynn lied on purpose to get arrested, Q asks why would he do that and calls it a rubber bullet. When do you use rubber bullets? Trump pardoned Flynn and Stone. Tore has everything you need to know about Stone in her telegram channel.

You might disagree with this entire idea but try to look at the Flynn drops without bias assuming that Flynn is infiltrating us instead of the other way around. I think this perspective paints a different picture.

https://qalerts.net/?n=1936

https://qalerts.net/?n=1459

https://qalerts.net/?n=1370

https://qalerts.net/?n=1284

https://qalerts.net/?n=953

https://qalerts.net/?n=97

https://qalerts.net/?n=36

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I’ve seen a few arguments that Q mentions Flynn and not Lin inside some of these threads.

In light of recent events, have we been looking at this wrong? Q doesn’t mention anything positive about Flynn. Correct me if I’m wrong but it seemed like he came out with Q references and we just all assumed he was what would move us forward. I recall he’s said some things in the past that make you question his motives but everyone always says “disinfo is necessary”. To be honest, this seems like a shill tactic to sweep it under the rug. I’m seeing people still do this despite the full context of the recent conversations.

I’m on my phone and I’ll try to go through each post eventually but the recurring pattern is focusing on his background. Here are some of the posts that I believe can be inferred negatively towards Flynn.

Trump wished Flynn luck when he was sentenced, which he only does towards his enemies. Flynn lied on purpose to get arrested, Q asks why would he do that and calls it a rubber bullet. When do you use rubber bullets? Trump pardoned Flynn and Stone. Tore has everything you need to know about Stone in her telegram channel.

You might disagree with this entire idea but try to look at the Flynn drops without bias assuming that Flynn is infiltrating us instead of the other way around. I think this perspective paints a different picture.

https://qalerts.net/?n=1936

https://qalerts.net/?n=1459

https://qalerts.net/?n=1370

https://qalerts.net/?n=1284

https://qalerts.net/?n=953

https://qalerts.net/?n=97

https://qalerts.net/?n=36

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I’ve seen a few arguments that Q mentions Flynn and not Lin inside some of these threads.

In light of recent events, have we been looking at this wrong? Q doesn’t mention anything positive about Flynn. Correct me if I’m wrong but it seemed like he came out with Q references and we just all assumed he was what would move us forward. I recall he’s said some things in the past that make you question his motives but everyone always says “disinfo is necessary”. To be honest, this seems like a shill tactic to sweep it under the rug. I’m seeing people still do this despite the full context of the recent conversations.

I’m on my phone and I’ll try to go through each post eventually but the recurring pattern is focusing on his background. Here are some of the posts that I believe can be inferred negatively towards Flynn.

Trump wished Flynn luck when he was sentenced, which he only does towards his enemies. Flynn lied on purpose to get arrested, Q asks why would he do that and calls it a rubber bullet. When do you use rubber bullets? Trump pardoned Flynn and Stone. Tore has everything you need to know about Stone in her telegram channel.

You might disagree with this entire idea but try to look at the Flynn drops without bias assuming that Flynn is infiltrating us instead of the other way around.

https://qalerts.net/?n=1936

https://qalerts.net/?n=1459

https://qalerts.net/?n=1370

https://qalerts.net/?n=1284

https://qalerts.net/?n=953

https://qalerts.net/?n=97

https://qalerts.net/?n=36

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I’ve seen a few arguments that Q mentions Flynn and not Lin inside some of these threads.

In light of recent events, have we been looking at this wrong? Q doesn’t mention anything positive about Flynn. Correct me if I’m wrong but it seemed like he came out with Q references and we just all assumed he was what would move us forward. I recall he’s said some things in the past that make you question his motives but everyone always says “disinfo is necessary”. To be honest, this seems like a shill tactic to sweep it under the rug. I’m seeing people still do this despite the full context of the recent conversations.

I’m on my phone and I’ll try to go through each post eventually but the recurring pattern is focusing on his background. Here are some of the posts that I believe can be inferred negatively towards Flynn.

Trump wished Flynn luck when he was sentenced, which he only does towards his enemies. Flynn lied on purpose to get arrested, Q asks why would he do that and calls it a rubber bullet. When do you use rubber bullets? Trump pardoned Flynn and Stone. Tore has everything you need to know about Stone in her telegram channel.

https://qalerts.net/?n=1936

https://qalerts.net/?n=1459

https://qalerts.net/?n=1370

https://qalerts.net/?n=1284

https://qalerts.net/?n=953

https://qalerts.net/?n=97

https://qalerts.net/?n=36

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I’ve seen a few arguments that Q mentions Flynn and not Lin inside some of these threads.

In light of recent events, have we been looking at this wrong? Q doesn’t mention anything positive about Flynn. Correct me if I’m wrong but it seemed like he came out with Q references and we just all assumed he was what would move us forward. I recall he’s said some things in the past that make you question his motives but everyone always says “disinfo is necessary”. To be honest, this seems like a shill tactic to sweep it under the rug. I’m seeing people still do this despite the full context of the recent conversations.

I’m on my phone and I’ll try to go through each post eventually but the recurring pattern is focusing on his background. Here are some of the posts that I believe can be inferred negatively towards Flynn.

https://qalerts.net/?n=1936

https://qalerts.net/?n=1459

https://qalerts.net/?n=1370

https://qalerts.net/?n=1284

https://qalerts.net/?n=953

https://qalerts.net/?n=97

https://qalerts.net/?n=36

2 years ago
1 score