Every event like this has small details that are real, but the majority isn't. Just note how quickly the parents are to lawyer up and protecting the "shooter" with pleading the 5th. That's quite different than events from the past. There's a much bigger story here on that inclination alone. Could it be possible that outside elements have been influencing the kid to do something, whether it be cooperating behind the scenes with a physician or psychologist, the kid being framed for another operation to distract from ghislane and the parade massacre, etc.. and then to use this guy to hype up the sensation of a "hero".. was he really a hero? Maybe he was. Maybe he wasn't. Either way, why does it seem to happen only when a democrat is president? (Not to say repubs are not equally corrupt in their own fashion but its a recently alarming trend). There's definitely an agenda here. The race card isn't working, so they are reverting to Columbine style tactics (of which is a shooting that I can almost believe was completely organic, but obviously some of the elements weren't).

I think too people are quick to say "its fake!" and it gets interpreted as "it didn't happen".. which obviously is not true, SOMETHING happened. So the verbiage has to be precise when we discuss it.

Every event like this has small details that are real, but the majority isn't. Just note how quickly the parents are to lawyer up and protecting the "shooter" with pleading the 5th. There's a much bigger story here on that inclination alone. Could it be possible that outside elements have been influencing the kid to do something, whether it be cooperating behind the scenes with a physician or psychologist, the kid being framed for another operation to distract from ghislane and the parade massacre, etc.. and then to use this guy to hype up the sensation of a "hero".. was he really a hero? Maybe he was. Maybe he wasn't. Either way, why does it seem to happen only when a democrat is president? (Not to say repubs are not equally corrupt in their own fashion but its a recently alarming trend). There's definitely an agenda here. The race card isn't working, so they are reverting to Columbine style tactics (of which is a shooting that I can almost believe was completely organic, but obviously some of the elements weren't).

I think too people are quick to say "its fake!" and it gets interpreted as "it didn't happen".. which obviously is not true, SOMETHING happened. So the verbiage has to be precise when we discuss it.

Every event like this has small details that are real, but the majority isn't. Just note how quickly the parents are to lawyer up and protecting the "shooter" with pleading the 5th. There's a much bigger story here on that inclination alone. Could it be possible that outside elements have been influencing the kid to do something, whether it be cooperating behind the scenes with a physician or psychologist, the kid being framed for another operation to distract from ghislane and the parade massacre, etc.. and then to use this guy to hype up the sensation of a "hero".. was he really a hero? Maybe he was. Maybe he wasn't. Either way, we go through this in majority democrat presidencies. There's definitely an agenda here. The race card isn't working, so they are reverting to Columbine style tactics (of which is a shooting that I can almost believe was completely organic, but obviously some of the elements weren't).

I think too people are quick to say "its fake!" and it gets interpreted as "it didn't happen".. which obviously is not true, SOMETHING happened. So the verbiage has to be precise when we discuss it.