Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: added junk

I will try to make sense of my thought process.

The "stars" can be considered a metaphor and doesn't actually require for them to be famous. Consider that hollywood is a DISTRACTION.

They thought you would follow the distraction.

It is a divisive mechanism.

While I do see the need to be able to cut away for moments to retain sanity I feel that talking about these people helps that mechanism.

If the war is not won yet do we celebrate the enemy? I cannot say that this one in particular is an enemy at all but considering from where they hail (sports, in this case), within the distraction, I do not think it a far stretch that the enemy would use all sorts of tricks to deceive. Trying to get us focused on "planted" small "victories".

I am in no way upset with this person getting citizenship, I am glad they joined, and am in no way upset with the name change for them personally is that decision. To talk about it is to take away from focus on the battle field. We should be greatful, of course but I feel it necessary to be hesitant with such topics. Perhaps it does serve as a moral boost and I am overlooking the good for the potential bad.

I must also note that talking about anyone is considered gossip. This would be a sin and lends to my previous idea.

2 years ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

I will try to make sense of my thought process.

The "stars" can be considered a metaphor and doesn't actually require for them to be famous. Consider that hollywood is a DISTRACTION.

They thought you would follow the distraction.

It is a divisive mechanism.

While I do see the need to be able to cut away for moments to retain sanity I feel that talking about these people helps that mechanism.

If the war is not won yet do we celebrate the enemy? I cannot say that this one in particular is an enemy at all but considering from where they hail (sports, in this case), within the distraction, I do not think it a far stretch that the enemy would use all sorts of tricks to deceive. Trying to get us focused on "planted" small "victories".

I am in no way upset with this person getting citizenship, I am glad they joined, and am in no way upset with the name change for them personally is that decision. To talk about it is to take away from focus on the battle field. We should be greatful, of course but I feel it necessary to be hesitant with such topics. Perhaps it does serve as a moral boost and I am overlooking the good for the potential bad.

2 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original

I will try to make sense of my thought process.

The "stars" can be considered a metaphor and doesn't actually require for them to be famous. Consider that hollywood is a DISTRACTION.

They thought you would follow the distraction.

It is a divisive mechanism.

While I do see the need to be able to cut away for moments to retain sanity I feel that talking about these people helps that mechanism.

If the war is not won yet do we celebrate the enemy? I cannot say that this one in particular is an enemy at all but considering from where they hail (sports, in this case), within the distraction, I do not think it a far stretch that the enemy would use all sorts of tricks to deceive. Trying to get us focused on "planted" small "victories".

I am in no way upset with this person getting citizenship, I am glad they joined, and am in no way upset with the name change for them personally is that decision. To talk about it is to take away from focus on the battle field. We should be greatful, of course but I feel it necessary to be hesitant with such topics as. Perhaps it does serve as a moral boost and I am overlooking the good for the potential bad.

2 years ago
1 score