Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

It's only a contradiction to YOU because you think you know what's in my head.

100% incorrect. It has nothing to do with your beliefs, however, anyone who is 100% sure they are correct can't see anything outside of the scope of that certainty. That is the problem with being so sure of your beliefs. It limits the scope of all other inputs to fit that belief. All input is tainted by it.

They were a contradiction precisely because on the one hand you stated you didn't care about being right, and on the other hand you assumed that you were right.

If you didn't care about being right, you would allow for the possibility that you are not right. I have seen no evidence to suggest, from your words, that you allow for the possibility that you are not right, thus you care a great deal. To the exclusion of all other possibilities in fact.

You claim that what is proposed about Germany is controversial, or debatable. If you were aware of all that's been written and discovered over the past seventy years, you wouldn't make that claim.

We live in The Matrix. The Matrix has been around for a very long time (thousands of years at least). You thinking that because documents have been around for 70 years means it somehow isn't a part of The Matrix is not supported by the evidence. The PTB control all sides of the narrative. EVERTHING is suspect. When you stop suspecting everything, you are doing exactly what The Matrix wants.

I would caution you against psychoanalyzing someone as you have attempted to do to me.

Not once have I done this. I think you are once again misconstruing my words to mean something they have not. What I have done is look at your words. All of my responses have been based upon those words, nothing more. If you think I projected my ideas of your thoughts that you did not say onto what you did say, point them out.

Someone standing in front of you may not be as open-minded.

A person who knows with 100% certainty that they are right is the exact opposite of someone who is "open-minded."

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It's only a contradiction to YOU because you think you know what's in my head.

100% incorrect. It has nothing to do with your beliefs, however, anyone who is 100% sure they are correct can't see anything outside of the scope of that certainty. That is the problem with being so sure of your beliefs. It limits the scope of all other inputs to fit that belief. All input is tainted by it.

They were a contradiction precisely because on the one hand you stated you didn't care about being right, and on the other hand you assumed that you were right.

If you didn't care about being right, you would allow for the possibility that you are not right. I have seen no evidence to suggest, from your words, that you allow for the possibility that you are not right, thus you care a great deal. To the exclusion of all other possibilities in fact.

You claim that what is proposed about Germany is controversial, or debatable. If you were aware of all that's been written and discovered over the past seventy years, you wouldn't make that claim.

We live in The Matrix. The Matrix has been around for a very long time (thousands of years at least). You thinking that because documents have been around for 70 years means it somehow isn't a part of The Matrix is not supported by the evidence. The PTB control all sides of the narrative. EVERTHING is suspect. When you stop suspecting everything, you are doing exactly what The Matrix wants.

I would caution you against psychoanalyzing someone as you have attempted to do to me.

Not once have I done this. I think you are once again misconstruing my words to mean something they have not. What I have done is look at your words. If your words are not what you mean, then use different words that you do mean. Otherwise I will assume your words are what you mean and I will base my responses on those words (which is all I have done).

Someone standing in front of you may not be as open-minded.

A person who knows with 100% certainty that they are right is the exact opposite of someone who is "open-minded."

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It's only a contradiction to YOU because you think you know what's in my head.

100% incorrect. It has nothing to do with your beliefs, however, anyone who is 100% sure they are correct can't see anything outside of the scope of that certainty. That is the problem with being so sure of your beliefs. It limits the scope of all other inputs to fit that belief. All input is tainted by it.

They were a contradiction precisely because on the one hand you stated you didn't care about being right, and on the other hand you assumed that you were right.

If you didn't care about being right, you would allow for the possibility that you are not right. I have seen no evidence to suggest, from your words, that you allow for the possibility that you are not right, thus you care a great deal. To the exclusion of all other possibilities in fact.

You claim that what is proposed about Germany is controversial, or debatable. If you were aware of all that's been written and discovered over the past seventy years, you wouldn't make that claim.

We live in The Matrix. The Matrix has been around for a very long time (thousands of years at least). You thinking that because documents have been around for 70 years means it somehow isn't a part of The Matrix is not supported by the evidence. The PTB control all sides of the narrative. EVERTHING is suspect. When you stop suspecting everything, you are doing exactly what The Matrix wants.

I would caution you against psychoanalyzing someone as you have attempted to do to me.

Not once have I done this. I think you are once again misconstruing my words to mean something they have not.

Someone standing in front of you may not be as open-minded.

A person who knows with 100% certainty that they are right is the exact opposite of someone who is "open-minded."

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

It's only a contradiction to YOU because you think you know what's in my head.

100% incorrect. It has nothing to do with your beliefs, however, anyone who is 100% sure they are correct can't see anything outside of the scope of that certainty. That is the problem with being so sure of your beliefs. It limits the scope of all other inputs to fit that belief. All input is tainted by it.

You claim that what is proposed about Germany is controversial, or debatable. If you were aware of all that's been written and discovered over the past seventy years, you wouldn't make that claim.

We live in The Matrix. The Matrix has been around for a very long time (thousands of years at least). You thinking that because documents have been around for 70 years means it somehow isn't a part of The Matrix is not supported by the evidence. The PTB control all sides of the narrative. EVERTHING is suspect. When you stop suspecting everything, you are doing exactly what The Matrix wants.

I would caution you against psychoanalyzing someone as you have attempted to do to me.

Not once have I done this. I think you are once again misconstruing my words to mean something they have not.

Someone standing in front of you may not be as open-minded.

A person who knows with 100% certainty that they are right is the exact opposite of someone who is "open-minded."

2 years ago
1 score