yes, i agree with your post and definitely think there’s something shady with all the gatherings; they’re orchestrated & they haven’t studied the Q drops or magazines.
just have to point out the george coincidences as it’s not out of the question to ‘discuss’ Jr. since he was mentioned in the drops 1082/1083...but we shouldn’t be talking about him in the context of juan osavin or negative 48, they’re just PAYtriot distractions.
yes, i agree with your post and definitely think there’s something shady with all the gatherings. obvious they’re orchestrated & they haven’t studied the Q drops or magazines.
just have to point out the george coincidences as it’s not out of the question to ‘discuss’ Jr. since he was mentioned in the drops 1082/1083...but we shouldn’t be talking about him in the context of juan osavin or negative 48, they’re just PAYtriot distractions.
yes, i agree with your title and definitely think there’s something shady with all the gatherings. obvious they’re orchestrated & they haven’t studied the Q drops or magazines.
just have to point out the george coincidences as it’s not out of the question to ‘discuss’ Jr. since he was mentioned in the drops 1082/1083...but we shouldn’t be talking about him in the context of juan osavin or negative 48, they’re just PAYtriot distractions.
yes, i agree with your title and definitely think there’s something shady with all the gatherings. obvious they’re orchestrated & they haven’t studied the Q drops or magazines.
just have to point out the george coincidences as it’s not completely out of the question to ‘discuss’ Jr. since he was mentioned in the drops 1082/1083...but we shouldn’t be talking about him in the context of juan osavin or negative 48, they’re just PAYtriot distractions.
yes, i agree with your title and definitely think there’s something shady with all the gatherings. obvious they’re orchestrated & haven’t studied the Q drops or magazines.
just have to point out the george coincidences as it’s not completely out of the question to ‘discuss’ Jr. since he was mentioned in the drops 1082/1083...but we shouldn’t be talking about him in the context of juan osavin or negative 48, they’re just PAYtriot distractions.