You will please forgive me I am going to accuse you of employing the False Dilemma "Either/Or" fallacy in your argument.
Either Trump has to publicly fully Champion the efficacy and safety of the jab and push people to take it.
Or Trump has to publicly denounce the jab as useless, unsafe, and tell people not to take it.
There are more than the two option for Trump to take.
If you truly believe, as I do, that the jab:
Has permanently destroyed the health (quality of life) of million
Has killed over one hundred thousand people including kids
Is a tool of the globalist to kill or enslave billions - see Zelenko
Then you have to ask yourself if trying to convince people that the jab is harmless, and that they should rush off to take it is a good thing.
"who do you think the full power of the deep state would come after?"
Are you so naive that you believe playing nice with Satan garner nice treatment in return.
Guess what, if we as Christians take God's side, Satan wages war against us, he tries to destroy our lives, family, everything we care about, does that mean we should go out and tell people to become Satan worshipers, so we don't get attacked by the father of evil himself.
Trump could have remained neutral on the jab. He could have said that while he is proud that his admin was able to get the jab out in record time, he is concerned that the push for speed might have cut corners on safety. And he could have simply stated that he leaves it up to the individual to decide.
There are many way Trump could communicate about jab without appearing to be it's greatest champion.
You will please forgive me I am going to accuse you of employing the False Dilemma "Either/Or" fallacy in your argument.
Either Trump has to publicly fully Champion the efficacy and safety of the jab and push people to take it.
Or Trump has to publicly denounce the jab as useless, unsafe, and tell people not to take it.
There are more than the two option for Trump to take.
If you truly believe, as I do, that the jab:
Has permanently destroyed the health (quality of life) of million
Has killed over one hundred thousand people including kids
Is a tool of the globalist to kill or enslave billions ([see Zelenko)] (https://banned.video/watch?id=61c50b662a575232aa74ab07)
Then you have to ask yourself if trying to convince people that the jab is harmless, and that they should rush off to take it is a good thing.
"who do you think the full power of the deep state would come after?"
Are you so naive that you believe playing nice with Satan garner nice treatment in return.
Guess what, if we as Christians take God's side, Satan wages war against us, he tries to destroy our lives, family, everything we care about, does that mean we should go out and tell people to become Satan worshipers, so we don't get attacked by the father of evil himself.
Trump could have remained neutral on the jab. He could have said that while he is proud that his admin was able to get the jab out in record time, he is concerned that the push for speed might have cut corners on safety. And he could have simply stated that he leaves it up to the individual to decide.
There are many way Trump could communicate about jab without appearing to be it's greatest champion.