Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The S protein mRNA are broken down, at least according to the documentation. The Pfizer docs say the half life is about 2 days (as opposed to 10 hours for the average mRNA). The modifications do not prevent break down, they are actually using natural (as in, found in nature) methods to extend the mRNA half-life by a factor of about 5.

The nanoparticles themselves are constructed of PEG and fatty acids (albeit not natural ones). Tests on PEG show it is broken down and flushed out just fine. The documentation on the fatty acids also say they are broken down by normal lipid breakdown pathways.

Does that mean that the documentation is telling the truth? Nope. But there is no reason to doubt it either. There is nothing suspicious about any of these molecules with regards to the endogenous break down mechanisms that exist. Unless there is evidence to support fears of "won't get broken down", then any statements can't be more than suspicions. At best suspicions only lead to experiments to determine if a hypothesis is correct. Promoting hypotheses (suspicions) as fact is exactly what The Matrix does to keep people contained within it.

Overall, the idea that these things "last forever" is ludicrous. Not a single atom of your body is the same as the ones you were born with. Everything gets replaced. The only questions are, how long does it take, and how much damage does it do in the mean time. In the case of all of the things in the "vaxx", all of them seem to not take very long, according to the documentation (which are not terribly suspicious, though they should be double and triple checked).

How much damage they do in the meantime is certainly up for debate, but the idea that it is a "forever" thing is nothing but a fear that has no evidential support, and a ton of support against.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The S protein mRNA are broken down, at least according to the documentation. The Pfizer docs say the half life is about 2 days (as opposed to 10 hours for the average mRNA). The modifications do not prevent break down, they are actually using natural (as in, found in nature) methods to extend the mRNA half-life by a factor of about 5.

The nanoparticles themselves are constructed of PEG and fatty acids (albeit not natural ones). Tests on PEG show it is broken down and flushed out just fine. The documentation on the fatty acids also say they are broken down by normal lipid breakdown pathways.

Does that mean that the documentation is telling the truth? Nope. But there is no reason to doubt it either. There is nothing suspicious about any of these molecules with regards to the endogenous break down mechanisms that exist. Unless there is evidence to support fears of "won't get broken down", then any statements can't be more than suspicions. At best suspicions only lead to experiments to determine if a hypothesis is correct. Promoting hypotheses (suspicions) as fact is exactly what The Matrix does to keep people contained within it.

Overall, the idea that these things "last forever" is ludicrous. Not a single atom of your body is the same as the ones you were born with. Everything gets replaced. The only questions are, how long does it take, and how much damage does it do in the mean time. In the case of all of the things in the "vaxx", all of them seem to not take very long, according to the documentation (which are not terribly suspicious, though they should be double and triple checked).

How much damage do they do in the meantime is certainly up for debate, but the idea that it is a "forever" thing is nothing but a fear that has no evidential support, and a ton of support against.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

The S protein mRNA are broken down, at least according to the documentation. The Pfizer docs say the half life is about 2 days (as opposed to 10 hours for the average mRNA). The modifications do not prevent break down, they are actually using natural (as in, found in nature) methods to extend the mRNA half-life by a factor of about 5.

The nanoparticles themselves are constructed of PEG and fatty acids (albeit not natural ones). Tests on PEG show it is broken down and flushed out just fine. The documentation on the fatty acids also say they are broken down by normal lipid breakdown pathways.

Does that mean that the documentation is telling the truth? Nope. But there is no reason to doubt it either. There is nothing suspicious about any of these molecules with regards to the endogenous break down mechanisms that exist. Unless there is evidence to support fears of "won't get broken down", then any statements can't be more than suspicions. At best suspicions only lead to experiments to determine if a hypothesis is correct. Promoting hypotheses (suspicions) as fact is exactly what The Matrix does to keep people contained within it.

Overall, the idea that these things "last forever" is ludicrous. Not a single atom of your body is the same as the ones you were born with. Everything gets replaced. The only questions are, how long does it take, and how much damage does it do in the mean time. In the case of all of the things in the "vaxx", all of them seem to not take very long, according to the documentation. How much damage do they do in the meantime is up to debate, but the idea that it is a "forever" thing is nothing but a fear that has no evidential support, and a ton of support against.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The S protein mRNA are broken down, at least according to the documentation. The Pfizer docs say the half life is about 2 days (as opposed to 10 hours for the average mRNA). The modifications do not prevent break down, they are actually using natural (as in, found in nature) methods to extend the mRNA half-life by a factor of about 5.

The nanoparticles themselves are constructed of PEG and fatty acids (albeit not natural ones). Tests on PEG show it is broken down and flushed out just fine. The documentation on the fatty acids also say they are broken down by normal lipid breakdown pathways.

Does that mean that the documentation is telling the truth? Nope. But there is no reason to doubt it either. There is nothing suspicious about any of these molecules with regards to the endogenous break down mechanisms that exist. Unless there is evidence to support fears of "won't get broken down", then any statements can't be more than suspicions. At best suspicions only lead to experiments to determine if a hypothesis is correct. Promoting hypotheses (suspicions) as fact is exactly what The Matrix does to keep people contained within it.

2 years ago
1 score