Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

That is very interesting.

My research is pointing to the idea that there is no "bad" bacteria in or on your body. All the bacteria living in and on your body is good for you. That, of course, would include what is on your skin/hands.

All these bacteria have a job to do. But when their environment (your body) changes (mostly due to food/drink you ingest, but also external toxins), then they also change to adapt to the new environment. They also might need to adapt to change their job.

Modern medicine is stuck on the idea of monomorphism when it comes to microorganisms. That is, each organism has only one look and set of characteristics. That is like a human is always a human and never suddenly changes into a unicorn.

However, biology also gives us pleomorphism, where something can change into something else. A caterpillar changes into a butterfly. It turns out, modern medicine is wrong about this when it comes to bacteria. Bacteria are pleomorphic, not monomorphic (or at least, some of them are). This has been directly observed in microscopes, where they can change into a completely different form.

This means that if you look at someone's blood, you might see one type of bacteria, but at a later time, you might see something else. It's not necessarily the case that one died off and the other somehow magically appeared. Rather, it is more likely that it just changed characteristics, because it now has a different job to do, due to a change in its environment.

Antibacterial soaps kill the bacteria on the skin, which is a bad thing, because all of them are good and necessary for good health.

Your story about how everyone in the household got sick, but that changed when the type of soap changed, is a very interesting datapoint that should be explored.

I think you discovered a nugget of little-known truth.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

That is very interesting.

There is so much nonsense in this entire thread that I wouldn't have the time to respond to it all. But I will just post this, because I think you are on to something.

My research is pointing to the idea that there is no "bad" bacteria in or on your body. All the bacteria living in and on your body is good for you. That, of course, would include what is on your skin/hands.

All these bacteria have a job to do. But when their environment (your body) changes (mostly due to food/drink you ingest, but also external toxins), then they also change to adapt to the new environment. They also might need to adapt to change their job.

Modern medicine is stuck on the idea of monomorphism when it comes to microorganisms. That is, each organism has only one look and set of characteristics. That is like a human is always a human and never suddenly changes into a unicorn.

However, biology also gives us pleomorphism, where something can change into something else. A caterpillar changes into a butterfly. It turns out, modern medicine is wrong about this when it comes to bacteria. Bacteria are pleomorphic, not monomorphic (or at least, some of them are). This has been directly observed in microscopes, where they can change into a completely different form.

This means that if you look at someone's blood, you might see one type of bacteria, but at a later time, you might see something else. It's not necessarily the case that one died off and the other somehow magically appeared. Rather, it is more likely that it just changed characteristics, because it now has a different job to do, due to a change in its environment.

Antibacterial soaps kill the bacteria on the skin, which is a bad thing, because all of them are good and necessary for good health.

Your story about how everyone in the household got sick, but that changed when the type of soap changed, is a very interesting datapoint that should be explored.

I think you discovered a nugget of little-known truth.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

That is very interesting.

There is so much nonsense in this entire thread that I wouldn't have the time to respond to it all. But I will just post this, because I think you are on to something.

My research is pointing to the idea that there is no "bad" bacteria in or on your body. All the bacteria living in and on your body is good for you. That, of course, would include what is on your skin/hands.

All these bacteria have a job to do. But when their environment (your body) changes (mostly due to food/drink you ingest, but also external toxins), then they also change to adapt to the new environment. They also might need to adapt to change their job.

Modern medicine is stuck on the idea of monomorphism when it comes to microorganisms. That is, each organism has only one look and set of characteristics. That is like a human is always a human and never suddenly changes into a unicorn.

However, biology also gives us pleomorphism, where something can change into something else. A caterpillar changes into a butterfly. It turns out, modern medicine is wrong about this when it comes to bacteria. Bacteria are pleomorphic, not monomorphic (or at least, some of them are). This has been directly observed in microscopes, where they can change into a completely different form.

This means that if you look at someone's blood, you might see one type of bacteria, but at a later time, you might see something else. It's not necessarily the case that one died off and the other somehow magically appeared. Rather, it is more likely that it just changed characteristics, because it now has a different job to do, due to a change in its environment.

Antibacterial soaps kill the bacteria on the skin, which is a bad thing, because all of them being good and necessary for good health.

Your story about how everyone in the household got sick, but that changed when the type of soap changed, is a very interesting datapoint that should be explored.

I think you discovered a nugget of little-known truth.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

That is very interesting.

There is so much nonsense in this entire thread that I wouldn't have the time to respond to it all. But I will just post this, because I think you are on to something.

My research is pointing to the idea that there is no "bad" bacteria in or on your body. All the bacteria living in and on your body is good for you. That, of course, would include what is on your skin/hands.

All these bacteria have a job to do. But when their environment (your body) changes (mostly due to food/drink you ingest, but also external toxins), then they also change to adapt to the new environment. They also might need to adapt to change their job.

Modern medicine is stuck on the idea of monomorphism when it comes to microorganisms. That is, each organism has only one look and set of characteristics. That is like a human is always a human and never suddenly changes into a unicorn.

However, biology also gives us pleomorphism, where something can change into something else. A caterpillar changes into a butterfly. It turns out, modern medicine is wrong about this when it comes to bacteria. Bacteria are pleomorphic, not monomorphic (or at least, some of them are). This has been directly observed in microscopes, where they can change into a completely different form.

This means that if you look at someone's blood, you might see one type of bacteria, but at a later time, you might see something else. It's not necessarily the case that one died off and the other somehow magically appeared. Rather, it is more likely that it just changed characteristics, because it now has a different job to do, due to a change in its environment.

Antibacterial soaps kill the bacteria on the skin, which is a bad thingm because all of them being good and necessary for good health.

Your story about how everyone in the household got sick, but that changed when the type of soap changed, is a very interesting datapoint that should be explored.

I think you discovered a nugget of little-known truth.

2 years ago
1 score