I can’t be 100% certain that the pope is guilty. However, he and his organization deserve a closer look. Why? Because of the factual evidence and witness accounts that exist.
What I am saying is that there is actual factual documented evidence of some bad shit going on at the Vatican. Court cases where people are convicted and sent to jail is factual evidence. There is “out in the open” testimony from church insiders that the current leadership of the church is corrupt.
A photo of the pope with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell is not proof of anything except that they got close to powerful people including Donald Trump. In fact, that photo of Ms. Maxwell and the pope may be fake, so I’m not going to make any conclusions based on that one photo.
Please learn how to tell the difference between photo speculation and analysis of legal documentation and witness accounts.
In the future, please be less dumb.
I can’t be 100% certain that the pope is guilty. However, he and his organization deserve a closer look. Why? Because of the factual evidence and witness accounts that exist.
What I am saying is that there is actual factual documented evidence of some bad shit going on at the Vatican. Court cases where people are convicted and sent to jail is factual evidence. There is “out in the open” testimony from church insiders that the current leadership of the church is corrupt.
A photo of the pope with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell is not proof of anything except that they got close to powerful people including Donald Trump. In fact, that photo of Ms. Maxwell and the pope may be fake, so I’m not going to make any conclusions based on that one photo.
Please learn how to tell the difference between photo speculation and analysis of legal documentation and witness accounts.
I can’t be 100% certain that the pope is guilty. However, he and his organization deserve a closer look. Why? Because of the factual evidence and witness accounts that exist.
What I am saying is that there is actual factual documented evidence of some bad shit going on at the Vatican. Court cases where people are convicted and sent to jail is factual evidence. There is “out in the open” testimony from church insiders that the current leadership of the church is corrupt.
A photo of the pope with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell is proof of anything except that they got close to powerful people including Donald Trump. In fact, that photo of Ms. Maxwell and the pope may be fake, so I’m not going to make any conclusions based on that one photo.
Please learn how to tell the difference between photo speculation and analysis of legal documentation and witness accounts.
I can’t be 100% certain that the pope is guilty. However, he and his organization deserve a closer look. Why? Because of the factual evidence and witness accounts that exist.
What I am saying is that there is actual factual documented evidence of some bad shit going on at the Vatican. Court cases where people are convicted and sent to jail is factual evidence. There is “out in the open” testimony from church insiders that the current leadership of the church is corrupt.
A photo of the pope with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell is not factual evidence. In fact, that photo may be fake, so I’m not going to make any conclusions based on that one photo.
Please learn how to tell the difference between photo speculation and analysis of legal documentation and witness accounts.