Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Only if a death certificate states that vaxxine complications were the cause of death or that long term disability is due to vaxxine injury. The insurance companies can determine internally what they think may be going on in order to protect their bottom line, but unless there is an official reason from the medical examiner or an attending doctor stating causation, they do not have to prove anything. The majority of these injuries are being reported as being from other causes and not the vaxxines. Especially when death occurs more than a couple days post inoculation. Without a provable link, it honestly is only speculation on our part and theirs - even though most of the data we have is certainly pointed in that direction. The insurance company had no choice but to come forward with this information in the article because that is part of the public disclosure required. They have to explain the increase in claims - but they are certainly not going to say it is from the jabs no matter how much we know that vaxxines are more than likely the cause for most of them.

These people are all in bed together and are not going to throw each other under the bus. They will mitigate the loses internally and short of a whistleblower coming forward to expose their internal rationale, we will never know. They will quietly make changes and spread them across the entire sector to keep it from being so obvious. In the end, the consumer will shoulder the increase in cost - just as they intended. Don't think that this was not accounted for when they war gamed this out. They will cover each other.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Only if a death certificate states that vaxxine complications were the cause of death or that long term disability is due to vaxxine injury. The insurance companies can determine internally what they think may be going on in order to protect their bottom line, but unless there is an official reason from the medical examiner or an attending doctor stating causation, they do not have to prove anything. The majority of these injuries are being reported as being from other causes and not the vaxxines. Especially when death occurs more than a couple days post inoculation. Without a provable link, it honestly is only speculation on our part and theirs - even though most of the data we have is certainly pointed in that direction. The insurance company had no choice but to come forward with this information in the article as to the increase in claims because that is part of the public disclosure required. They have to explain the increase in claims - but they are certainly not going to say it is from the jabs no matter how much we know that vaxxines are more than likely the cause for most of them.

These people are all in bed together and are not going to throw each other under the bus. They will mitigate the loses internally and short of a whistleblower coming forward to expose their internal rationale, we will never know. They will quietly make changes and spread them across the entire sector to keep it from being so obvious. In the end, the consumer will shoulder the increase in cost - just as they intended. Don't think that this was not accounted for when they war gamed this out. They will cover each other.

2 years ago
1 score