Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I know that about Remdesivir... was being facetious. The thought was... oh, how convenient.... we have your treatment for Ebola already lined up.

Monoclonal also comes with risks and is experimental. We do not know what the long term effects of any of the so called treatments for the Rona are going to be. Monoclonal is a mixed bag and comes with its own set of surprises and no one is watching. It is based on the same designed genetic sequencing that started this whole farce to begin with - the spike protein, the PCR tests, the jabs, and the therapuetics. Some of it is synthetic and they were developed and tested using the same cell culture tech as vaxxines. So if there is a religious objection to vaxxines, the same would apply to monoclonal as well.

Gene therapies were developed for use to treat cancer and possibly some rare genetic defects. They were never meant to be used in otherwise healthy people. Developing treatments for terminal cancer that would by default come with a certain amount of acceptable risk is not the same thing as how that same tech has been rolled out against what for most people is a survivable flu. Our real problem is lack of early treatment. The cabal would never release a bioweapon they did not already have an easy and cheap antidote for. Prevention and early interventions would dramatically reduce the need for hospitalization or monoclonal antibody therapy.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I know that about Remdesivir... was being facetious. The thought was... oh, how convenient.... we have your treatment for Ebola already lined up.

Monoclonal also comes with risks and is experimental. We do not know what the long term effects of any of the so called treatments for the Rona are going to be. Monoclonal is a mixed bag and comes with its own set of surprises and no one is watching. It is based on the same designed genetic sequencing that started this whole farce to begin with - the spike protein, the PCR tests, the jabs, and the therapuetics. Some of it is synthetic and they were developed and tested using the same cell culture tech as vaxxines. So if there is a religious objection to vaxxines, the same would apply to monoclonal as well.

Gene therapies were developed for use to treat cancer and possibly some rare genetic defects. They were never meant to be used in otherwise healthy people. Developing treatments for terminal cancer that would by default come with a certain amount of acceptable risk is the same thing as how that same tech has been rolled out against what for most people is a survivable flu. Our real problem is lack of early treatment. The cabal would never release a bioweapon they did not already have an easy and cheap antidote for. Prevention and early interventions would dramatically reduce the need for hospitalization or monoclonal antibody therapy.

2 years ago
1 score