Did anyone happen to archive this in time?
Nvm I'm on it
ALL POSTS BY @JIKKYKJJ IN LAST 19 HR ARE ARCHIVED
Bookmark this tweet.
Sapan Desai holds the key to the whole #covid19 story.
Whoever made him retract his #IVM paper and submit the #lancetgate papers (that he was given) is behind the whole shebang.
He is literally the #sethrich of COVID.
@barnes_law @RandPaul
Called it:
Desai and Mehra were given (by a 3rd party) the paper that they submitted to the @NEJM to discredit #HCQ which resulted in a world genocide.
They even admitted it, and we all missed it.
Who was the 3rd party?
#lancetgate
@Timcast @RandPaul
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2021225
CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG. This is the full insert. It have 3 CpG on the (+) strand and 3 on the (-) strand. Immunogenicity and RFLP both important. One reason why this exact same sequence was used in a previous MODERNA cancer vaccine patent sequence. archive.is/6qUW3
Yes, Mdrna has patented 10.000's of sequences.
QTNSPRRAR is:
https://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=viewSequence&DocID=US09587003B2&seqID=11652
https://archive.ph/05IuC
"All hits below were the same MODERNA Oncology-related mRNA patent sequence."
If it was random, wouldn't there:
- be other 100% matching sequences?
- be other beta COV's matching 11652?
The circulating virus has now mutated to "ditch" the proline. Proline was there in the engineered state to create an angle that was not a helix and stabilize bonds . Without it, the cleaved epitope would "twist" to the inside and not be accessible to bind to MHC-1 and MHC-2.
@JikkyKjj
Michael how did the bats copy a 19nt sequence from a Moderna patent and splice it into a furin cleavage site that didn't exist in any previous generation?
I mean, was it done in a "la-bat-ory"?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
#CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
@metapills
"A SARS virus emerging naturally with 3 HIV inserts at its binding sites and also containing a furin cleavage site that doesn’t exist in nature but does exist in a Moderna patent… that’s seriously crazy talk."
#CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG Check out
@JikkyKjj
Did anyone happen to archive this in time?
Nvm I'm on it
ALL POSTS BY @JIKKYKJJ IN LAST 19 HR ARE ARCHIVED
Bookmark this tweet.
Sapan Desai holds the key to the whole #covid19 story.
Whoever made him retract his #IVM paper and submit the #lancetgate papers (that he was given) is behind the whole shebang.
He is literally the #sethrich of COVID.
@barnes_law @RandPaul ```
https://archive.ph/ZO4Zz
Called it: Desai and Mehra were given (by a 3rd party) the paper that they submitted to the @NEJM to discredit #HCQ which resulted in a world genocide.
They even admitted it, and we all missed it.
Who was the 3rd party? #lancetgate @Timcast @RandPaul ```
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2021225
CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG. This is the full insert. It have 3 CpG on the (+) strand and 3 on the (-) strand. Immunogenicity and RFLP both important. One reason why this exact same sequence was used in a previous MODERNA cancer vaccine patent sequence. archive.is/6qUW3
[IMAGE] Quite Yes. This is a bacterial Superantigen and is not a Viral superantigen. It may be a possible Viral neurotoxin but is unsupported. The alignment is best with Bacterial superantigens in both forward and reverse direction. This kinds of “adaptation” is unlikely to occur in
Yes, Mdrna has patented 10.000's of sequences.
QTNSPRRAR is:
https://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=viewSequence&DocID=US09587003B2&seqID=11652
https://archive.ph/05IuC
"All hits below were the same MODERNA Oncology-related mRNA patent sequence."
If it was random, wouldn't there:
- be other 100% matching sequences?
- be other beta COV's matching 11652?
The circulating virus has now mutated to "ditch" the proline. Proline was there in the engineered state to create an angle that was not a helix and stabilize bonds . Without it, the cleaved epitope would "twist" to the inside and not be accessible to bind to MHC-1 and MHC-2.
@JikkyKjj
Michael how did the bats copy a 19nt sequence from a Moderna patent and splice it into a furin cleavage site that didn't exist in any previous generation?
I mean, was it done in a "la-bat-ory"?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
#CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
@metapills
"A SARS virus emerging naturally with 3 HIV inserts at its binding sites and also containing a furin cleavage site that doesn’t exist in nature but does exist in a Moderna patent… that’s seriously crazy talk."
#CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG Check out
@JikkyKjj
Did anyone happen to archive this in time?
Nvm I'm on it
ALL POSTS BY @JIKKYKJJ IN LAST 19 HR ARE ARCHIVED
Bookmark this tweet.
Sapan Desai holds the key to the whole #covid19 story.
Whoever made him retract his #IVM paper and submit the #lancetgate papers (that he was given) is behind the whole shebang.
He is literally the #sethrich of COVID.
@barnes_law @RandPaul ```
https://archive.ph/ZO4Zz
Called it: Desai and Mehra were given (by a 3rd party) the paper that they submitted to the @NEJM to discredit #HCQ which resulted in a world genocide.
They even admitted it, and we all missed it.
Who was the 3rd party? #lancetgate @Timcast @RandPaul ```
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2021225
CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG. This is the full insert. It have 3 CpG on the (+) strand and 3 on the (-) strand. Immunogenicity and RFLP both important. One reason why this exact same sequence was used in a previous MODERNA cancer vaccine patent sequence. archive.is/6qUW3
[IMAGE] Quite Yes. This is a bacterial Superantigen and is not a Viral superantigen. It may be a possible Viral neurotoxin but is unsupported. The alignment is best with Bacterial superantigens in both forward and reverse direction. This kinds of “adaptation” is unlikely to occur in
Yes, Mdrna has patented 10.000's of sequences.
QTNSPRRAR is:
https://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=viewSequence&DocID=US09587003B2&seqID=11652
https://archive.ph/05IuC
"All hits below were the same MODERNA Oncology-related mRNA patent sequence."
If it was random, wouldn't there:
- be other 100% matching sequences?
- be other beta COV's matching 11652?
The circulating virus has now mutated to "ditch" the proline. Proline was there in the engineered state to create an angle that was not a helix and stabilize bonds . Without it, the cleaved epitope would "twist" to the inside and not be accessible to bind to MHC-1 and MHC-2.
@JikkyKjj
Michael how did the bats copy a 19nt sequence from a Moderna patent and splice it into a furin cleavage site that didn't exist in any previous generation?
I mean, was it done in a "la-bat-ory"?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
#CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
@metapills
"A SARS virus emerging naturally with 3 HIV inserts at its binding sites and also containing a furin cleavage site that doesn’t exist in nature but does exist in a Moderna patent… that’s seriously crazy talk."
#CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG Check out
@JikkyKjj
Did anyone happen to archive this in time?
Nvm I'm on it
Bookmark this tweet.
Sapan Desai holds the key to the whole #covid19 story.
Whoever made him retract his #IVM paper and submit the #lancetgate papers (that he was given) is behind the whole shebang.
He is literally the #sethrich of COVID.
@barnes_law @RandPaul ```
https://archive.ph/ZO4Zz
Called it: Desai and Mehra were given (by a 3rd party) the paper that they submitted to the @NEJM to discredit #HCQ which resulted in a world genocide.
They even admitted it, and we all missed it.
Who was the 3rd party? #lancetgate @Timcast @RandPaul ```
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2021225
CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG. This is the full insert. It have 3 CpG on the (+) strand and 3 on the (-) strand. Immunogenicity and RFLP both important. One reason why this exact same sequence was used in a previous MODERNA cancer vaccine patent sequence. archive.is/6qUW3
[IMAGE] Quite Yes. This is a bacterial Superantigen and is not a Viral superantigen. It may be a possible Viral neurotoxin but is unsupported. The alignment is best with Bacterial superantigens in both forward and reverse direction. This kinds of “adaptation” is unlikely to occur in
Yes, Mdrna has patented 10.000's of sequences.
QTNSPRRAR is:
https://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=viewSequence&DocID=US09587003B2&seqID=11652
https://archive.ph/05IuC
"All hits below were the same MODERNA Oncology-related mRNA patent sequence."
If it was random, wouldn't there:
- be other 100% matching sequences?
- be other beta COV's matching 11652?
The circulating virus has now mutated to "ditch" the proline. Proline was there in the engineered state to create an angle that was not a helix and stabilize bonds . Without it, the cleaved epitope would "twist" to the inside and not be accessible to bind to MHC-1 and MHC-2.
@JikkyKjj
Michael how did the bats copy a 19nt sequence from a Moderna patent and splice it into a furin cleavage site that didn't exist in any previous generation?
I mean, was it done in a "la-bat-ory"?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
#CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
@metapills
"A SARS virus emerging naturally with 3 HIV inserts at its binding sites and also containing a furin cleavage site that doesn’t exist in nature but does exist in a Moderna patent… that’s seriously crazy talk."
#CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG Check out
@JikkyKjj
Did anyone happen to archive this in time?
Nvm I'm on it
Bookmark this tweet.
Sapan Desai holds the key to the whole #covid19 story.
Whoever made him retract his #IVM paper and submit the #lancetgate papers (that he was given) is behind the whole shebang.
He is literally the #sethrich of COVID.
@barnes_law @RandPaul ```
https://archive.ph/ZO4Zz
Called it: Desai and Mehra were given (by a 3rd party) the paper that they submitted to the @NEJM to discredit #HCQ which resulted in a world genocide.
They even admitted it, and we all missed it.
Who was the 3rd party? #lancetgate @Timcast @RandPaul ```
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2021225
CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG. This is the full insert. It have 3 CpG on the (+) strand and 3 on the (-) strand. Immunogenicity and RFLP both important. One reason why this exact same sequence was used in a previous MODERNA cancer vaccine patent sequence. archive.is/6qUW3
[IMAGE] Quite Yes. This is a bacterial Superantigen and is not a Viral superantigen. It may be a possible Viral neurotoxin but is unsupported. The alignment is best with Bacterial superantigens in both forward and reverse direction. This kinds of “adaptation” is unlikely to occur in
Yes, Mdrna has patented 10.000's of sequences.
QTNSPRRAR is:
https://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=viewSequence&DocID=US09587003B2&seqID=11652
https://archive.ph/05IuC
"All hits below were the same MODERNA Oncology-related mRNA patent sequence."
If it was random, wouldn't there:
- be other 100% matching sequences?
- be other beta COV's matching 11652?
The circulating virus has now mutated to "ditch" the proline. Proline was there in the engineered state to create an angle that was not a helix and stabilize bonds . Without it, the cleaved epitope would "twist" to the inside and not be accessible to bind to MHC-1 and MHC-2.
@JikkyKjj
Michael how did the bats copy a 19nt sequence from a Moderna patent and splice it into a furin cleavage site that didn't exist in any previous generation?
I mean, was it done in a "la-bat-ory"?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
#CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG
Did anyone happen to archive this in time?
Nvm I'm on it
Bookmark this tweet.
Sapan Desai holds the key to the whole #covid19 story.
Whoever made him retract his #IVM paper and submit the #lancetgate papers (that he was given) is behind the whole shebang.
He is literally the #sethrich of COVID.
@barnes_law @RandPaul ```
https://archive.ph/ZO4Zz
Called it: Desai and Mehra were given (by a 3rd party) the paper that they submitted to the @NEJM to discredit #HCQ which resulted in a world genocide.
They even admitted it, and we all missed it.
Who was the 3rd party? #lancetgate @Timcast @RandPaul ```
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2021225
CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG. This is the full insert. It have 3 CpG on the (+) strand and 3 on the (-) strand. Immunogenicity and RFLP both important. One reason why this exact same sequence was used in a previous MODERNA cancer vaccine patent sequence. archive.is/6qUW3
[IMAGE] Quite Yes. This is a bacterial Superantigen and is not a Viral superantigen. It may be a possible Viral neurotoxin but is unsupported. The alignment is best with Bacterial superantigens in both forward and reverse direction. This kinds of “adaptation” is unlikely to occur in
Yes, Mdrna has patented 10.000's of sequences.
QTNSPRRAR is:
https://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=viewSequence&DocID=US09587003B2&seqID=11652
https://archive.ph/05IuC
"All hits below were the same MODERNA Oncology-related mRNA patent sequence."
If it was random, wouldn't there:
- be other 100% matching sequences?
- be other beta COV's matching 11652?
The circulating virus has now mutated to "ditch" the proline. Proline was there in the engineered state to create an angle that was not a helix and stabilize bonds . Without it, the cleaved epitope would "twist" to the inside and not be accessible to bind to MHC-1 and MHC-2.
Did anyone happen to archive this in time?
Nvm I'm on it
Bookmark this tweet.
Sapan Desai holds the key to the whole #covid19 story.
Whoever made him retract his #IVM paper and submit the #lancetgate papers (that he was given) is behind the whole shebang.
He is literally the #sethrich of COVID.
@barnes_law @RandPaul ```
https://archive.ph/ZO4Zz
Called it: Desai and Mehra were given (by a 3rd party) the paper that they submitted to the @NEJM to discredit #HCQ which resulted in a world genocide.
They even admitted it, and we all missed it.
Who was the 3rd party? #lancetgate @Timcast @RandPaul ```
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2021225
CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG. This is the full insert. It have 3 CpG on the (+) strand and 3 on the (-) strand. Immunogenicity and RFLP both important. One reason why this exact same sequence was used in a previous MODERNA cancer vaccine patent sequence. archive.is/6qUW3
[IMAGE] Quite Yes. This is a bacterial Superantigen and is not a Viral superantigen. It may be a possible Viral neurotoxin but is unsupported. The alignment is best with Bacterial superantigens in both forward and reverse direction. This kinds of “adaptation” is unlikely to occur in
Did anyone happen to archive this in time?