Do you reckon the phrase "Disinformation is necessary" is being freely abused left and right in this community whenever we need to immediately make peace with any piece of news or evidence that doesn't fit our narrative?? C'mon man. "Day after day I'll constantly label anything that doesn't support my narrative as necessary disinformation, cause afterall some Disinformation Is Necessary, and all is well". Like anons are gaslighting themselves into choosing to believe literally whatever they want - because the ugly pieces they dislike get instantly put under "disinfo is necessary".

People are choosing what is disinfo and what isn't based on whether or not it makes them feel cozy with themselves. It's bordering on Doublethink.

It's like that time when Q confirmed the earth isn't flat and discussion boards were awash with flat-earthers desperately saying "disinfo is necessary" because that one bit didn't fit their personal narrative --- Do anons get to pick and choose what is true and what isn't based on arbitrarily deciding what is disinfo and what isn't? If Q himself says "the earth isn't flat" and some people still arbitrarily decide this one drop was disinfo (because it challenged them so it had to be), then what about all the other drops?

So we have a free pass to freely pick and choose pieces of news or public statements as "necessary disinfo" (or even "it's just for optics"!) when it makes us cozy. Nice.

Do you reckon the phrase "Disinformation is necessary" is being freely abused left and right in this community whenever we need to immediately make peace with any piece of news or evidence that doesn't fit our narrative?? C'mon man. "Day after day I'll constantly label anything that doesn't support my narrative as necessary disinformation, cause afterall some Disinformation Is Necessary, and all is well". Like anons are gaslighting themselves into choosing to believe literally whatever they want - because the ugly pieces they dislike get instantly put under "disinfo is necessary".

People are choosing what is disinfo and what isn't based on whether or not it makes them feel cozy with themselves. It's bordering on Doublethink.

It's like that time when Q confirmed the earth isn't flat and discussion boards were awash with flat-earthers desperately saying "disinfo is necessary" because that one bit didn't fit their personal narrative --- Do anons get to pick and choose what is true and what isn't based on arbitrarily deciding what is disinfo and what isn't? If Q himself says "the earth isn't flat" and some people still arbitrarily decide this one drop was disinfo (because it challenged them so it had to be), then what about all the other drops?

So we have a free pass to pick and choose pieces of news or public statement as "necessary disinfo" (or even "it's just for optics"!) when it makes us cozy. Nice.

Do you reckon the phrase "Disinformation is necessary" is being freely abused left and right in this community whenever we need to immediately make peace with any piece of news or evidence that doesn't fit our narrative?? C'mon man. "Day after day I'll constantly label anything that doesn't support my narrative as necessary disinformation, cause afterall some Disinformation Is Necessary, and all is well". Like anons are gaslighting themselves into choosing to believe literally whatever they want - because the ugly pieces they dislike get instantly put under "disinfo is necessary".

People are choosing what is disinfo and what isn't based on whether or not it makes them feel cozy with themselves. It's bordering on Doublethink.

It's like that time when Q confirmed the earth isn't flat and discussion boards were awash with flat-earthers desperately saying "disinfo is necessary" because that one bit didn't fit their personal narrative --- Do anons get to pick and choose what is true and what isn't based on arbitrarily deciding what is disinfo and what isn't? If Q himself says "the earth isn't flat" and some people still arbitrarily decide this one drop was disinfo (because it challenged them so it had to be), then what about all the other drops?

So we have a free pass to pick and choose pieces of news or public statement as "necessary disinfo" when it makes us cozy. Nice.

Do you reckon the phrase "Disinformation is necessary" is being freely abused left and right in this community whenever we need to immediately make peace with any piece of news or evidence that doesn't fit our narrative?? C'mon man. "Day after day I'll constantly label anything that doesn't support my narrative as necessary disinformation, cause afterall some Disinformation Is Necessary, and all is well". Like anons are gaslighting themselves into choosing to believe literally whatever they want - because the ugly pieces they dislike get instantly put under "disinfo is necessary".

People are choosing what is disinfo and what isn't based on whether or not it makes them feel cozy with themselves. It's bordering on Doublethink.

It's like that time when Q confirmed the earth isn't flat and discussion boards were awash with flat-earthers desperately saying "disinfo is necessary" because that one bit didn't fit their personal narrative --- Do anons get to pick and choose what is true and what isn't based on arbitrarily deciding what is disinfo and what isn't? If Q himself says "the earth isn't flat" and some people still arbitrarily decide this one drop was disinfo (because it challenged them so it had to be), then what about all the other drops?

So we have a free pass to pick and choose pieces of news or public statement as "necessary disinfo" when it makes us cozy. Nice.

Do you reckon the phrase "Disinformation is necessary" is being freely abused left and right in this community whenever we need to immediately make peace with any piece of news or evidence that doesn't fit our narrative?? C'mon man. "Day after day I'll constantly label anything that doesn't support my narrative as necessary disinformation, cause afterall some Disinformation Is Necessary, and all is well". Like anons are gaslighting themselves into choosing to believe literally whatever they want - because the ugly pieces they dislike get instantly put under "disinfo is necessary".

People are choosing what is disinfo and what isn't based on whether or not it makes them feel cozy with themselves. It's bordering on Doublethink.

It's like that time when Q confirmed the earth isn't flat and discussion boards were awash with flat-earthers desperately saying "disinfo is necessary" because that one bit didn't fit their personal narrative --- Do anons get to pick and choose what is true and what isn't based on arbitrarily deciding what is disinfo and what isn't? If Q himself says "the earth isn't flat" and some people still arbitrarily decide this one drop was disinfo (because it challenged them so it had to be), then what about all the other drops?

So we have a free pass to claim any piece of news or public statement as "necessary disinfo" when it makes us cozy. Nice.

Do you reckon the phrase "Disinformation is necessary" is being freely abused left and right in this community whenever we need to immediately make peace with any piece of news or evidence that doesn't fit our narrative?? C'mon man. "Day after day I'll constantly label anything that doesn't support my narrative as necessary disinformation, cause afterall some Disinformation Is Necessary, and all is well". Like anons are gaslighting themselves into choosing to believe literally whatever they want - because the ugly pieces they dislike get instantly put under "disinfo is necessary".

People are choosing what is disinfo and what isn't based on whether or not it makes them feel cozy with themselves. It's bordering on Doublethink.

It's like that time when Q confirmed the earth isn't flat and discussion boards were awash with flat-earthers desperately saying "disinfo is necessary" because that one bit didn't fit their personal narrative --- Do anons get to pick and choose what is true and what isn't based on arbitrarily deciding what is disinfo and what isn't? If Q himself says "the earth isn't flat" and some people still arbitrarily decide this one drop was disinfo (because it challenged them), then what about all the other drops?

So we have a free pass to claim any piece of news or public statement as "necessary disinfo" when it makes us cozy. Nice.

Do you reckon the phrase "Disinformation is necessary" is being freely abused left and right in this community whenever we need to immediately make peace with any piece of news or evidence that doesn't fit our narrative?? C'mon man. "Day after day I'll constantly label anything that doesn't support my narrative as necessary disinformation, cause afterall some Disinformation Is Necessary, and all is well". Like anons are gaslighting themselves into choosing to believe literally whatever they want - because the ugly pieces they dislike get instantly put under "disinfo is necessary".

People are choosing what is disinfo and what isn't based on whether or not it makes them feel cozy with themselves. It's bordering on Doublethink.

It's like that time when Q confirmed the earth ins't flat and discussion boards were awash with flat-earthers desperately saying "disinfo is necessary" because that one bit didn't fit their personal narrative --- Do anons get to pick and choose what is true and what isn't based on arbitrarily deciding what is disinfo and what isn't? If Q himself says "the earth isn't flat" and some people still arbitrarily decide this one drop was disinfo (because it challenged them), then what about all the other drops?

So we have a free pass to claim any piece of news or public statement as "necessary disinfo" when it makes us cozy. Nice.