I don't even claim it as bullshit. I just say that it's really hard to walk up to people and claim that any of this is proof that Q is military intelligence or has the credibility that he claims to have to be taken as seriously as he is taken here.
For instance, let's take the very first link presented here as proof of Q and Trump's connection.
https://qanon.pub/data/proofs/01b6f3c7b899e31528bf3355bd28f666957ecd7490ec8263a2ce562602ffaeb3.jpg
Trump says "tip top" and then emphasizes it with "tippy top" into the State of the Union after it was requested by Q supporters. The timestamps prove it.
Wow. That... is pretty compelling.
Assuming, of course, that Trump isn't a fan of using such an odd expression as "tippy top" before his use of it for the 2018 State of the Union. Assuming that "tip top" was not a usual part of Trump's vocabulary before 2018.
So has Trump weirdly emphasized "tippy top" before 2018, when this proof occurred?
Yes. This YouTube video was uploaded in 2016, from a rally two years before this proof occurred. And Trump makes a big emphasis not just on "tip top" but "tippy top."
https://youtu.be/ypYy-WMuyiU?t=6080
Could it still be evidence, since we can't prove Trump WASN'T communicating with Q people?
Well, would you think I have an inside source to Joe Biden if I accurately predict he’ll use the the word “malarkey?”
I would counter it was far more likely that whoever made that ping request simply predicted Trump's somewhat unique language, because everyone who is a fan of Trump tends to adopt his expressions, even without realizing it.
And the fact that Q endorsed this makes me feel more like Q took advantage of a likely coincidence of Trump's language to establish credibility, not that Q's credibility was actually established. Q wasn't even involved in the original prediction. As far as I can tell, he just took credit for it after it came true.
"Tippy top" was an established Trumpism before the proof occurred, so the strength of this evidence has diminished significantly. All it took to research this was a quick search of transcripts for the use of the word I was wondering about, and then searching YouTube for the speech.
And for someone who isn't me, that would be enough for me to raise an eyebrow at the rest of the links on this list and think it's not worth going further.
I'm not going to sit here and try to debunk every proof presented, but anyone who you present these proof to will, and if they're halfway competent, they will perform these exact same checks on your sources.
You may want to run those checks yourself on every single proof and see if the underlying assumptions you're making (such as the notion of "tippy top" being some weird, unique signal that has no other reason to be uttered by Trump) will hold up when someone isn't willing to give the proof the benefit of the doubt.
I don't even claim it as bullshit. I just say that it's really hard to walk up to people and claim that any of this is proof that Q is military intelligence or has the credibility that he claims to have to be taken as seriously as he is taken here.
For instance, let's take the very first link presented here as proof of Q and Trump's connection.
https://qanon.pub/data/proofs/01b6f3c7b899e31528bf3355bd28f666957ecd7490ec8263a2ce562602ffaeb3.jpg
Trump says "tip top" and then emphasizes it with "tippy top" into the State of the Union after it was requested by Q supporters. The timestamps prove it.
Wow. That... is pretty compelling.
Assuming, of course, that Trump isn't a fan of using such an odd expression as "tippy top" before his use of it for the 2018 State of the Union. Assuming that "tip top" was not a usual part of Trump's vocabulary before 2018.
So has Trump weirdly emphasized "tippy top" before 2018, when this proof occurred?
Yes. This YouTube video was uploaded in 2016, from a rally two years before this proof occurred. And Trump makes a big emphasis not just on "tip top" but "tippy top."
https://youtu.be/ypYy-WMuyiU?t=6080
Could it still be evidence, since we can't prove Trump WASN'T communicating with Q people?
Well, would you think I have an inside source to Joe Biden if I accurately predict he’ll use the the word “malarkey?”
I would counter it was far more likely that whoever made that ping request simply predicted Trump's somewhat unique language, because everyone who is a fan of Trump tends to adopt his expressions, even without realizing it.
And the fact that Q endorsed this makes me feel more like Q took advantage of a likely coincidence of Trump's language to establish credibility, not that Q's credibility was actually established. Q wasn't even involved in the original prediction. As far as I can tell, he just took credit for it after it came true.
"Tippy top" was an established Trumpism before the proof occurred, so the strength of this evidence has diminished significantly. All it took to research this was a quick search of transcripts for the use of the word I was wondering about, and then searching YouTube for the speech.
And for someone who isn't me, that would be enough for me to raise an eyebrow at the rest of the links on this list and think it's not worth going further.
I'm not going to sit here and try to debunk every proof presented, but anyone who you present these proof to will, and if they're halfway competent, they will perform these exact same checks on your sources.
You may want to run those checks yourself on every single proof and see if the underlying assumptions you're making (such as the notion of "tippy top" being some weird, unique signal that has no other reason to be uttered by Trump) will hold up when someone isn't willing to give the proof the benefit of the doubt.
I don't even claim it as bullshit. I just say that it's really hard to walk up to people and claim that any of this is proof that Q is military intelligence or has the credibility that he claims to have to be taken as seriously as he is taken here.
For instance, let's take the very first link presented here as proof of Q and Trump's connection.
https://qanon.pub/data/proofs/01b6f3c7b899e31528bf3355bd28f666957ecd7490ec8263a2ce562602ffaeb3.jpg
Trump says "tip top" and then emphasizes it with "tippy top" into the State of the Union after it was requested by Q supporters. The timestamps prove it.
Wow. That... is pretty compelling.
Assuming, of course, that Trump isn't a fan of using such an odd expression as "tippy top" before his use of it for the 2018 State of the Union. Assuming that "tip top" was not a usual part of Trump's vocabulary before 2018.
So has Trump weirdly emphasized "tippy top" before 2018, when this proof occurred?
Yes. This YouTube video was uploaded in 2016, from a rally two years before this proof occurred. And Trump makes a big emphasis not just on "tip top" but "tippy top."
https://youtu.be/ypYy-WMuyiU?t=6080
Could it still be evidence, since we can't prove Trump WASN'T communicating with Q people?
I guess, but I would counter it was far more likely that whoever made that ping request simply predicted Trump's somewhat unique language, because everyone who is a fan of Trump tends to adopt his expressions, even without realizing it.
And the fact that Q endorsed this makes me feel more like Q took advantage of a likely coincidence of Trump's language to establish credibility, not that Q's credibility was actually established. Q wasn't even involved in the original prediction. As far as I can tell, he just took credit for it after it came true.
"Tippy top" was an established Trumpism before the proof occurred, so the strength of this evidence has diminished significantly. All it took to research this was a quick search of transcripts for the use of the word I was wondering about, and then searching YouTube for the speech.
And for someone who isn't me, that would be enough for me to raise an eyebrow at the rest of the links on this list and think it's not worth going further.
I'm not going to sit here and try to debunk every proof presented, but anyone who you present these proof to will, and if they're halfway competent, they will perform these exact same checks on your sources.
You may want to run those checks yourself on every single proof and see if the underlying assumptions you're making (such as the notion of "tippy top" being some weird, unique signal that has no other reason to be uttered by Trump) will hold up when someone isn't willing to give the proof the benefit of the doubt.
I don't even claim it as bullshit. I just say that it's really hard to walk up to people and claim that any of this is proof that Q is military intelligence or has the credibility that he claims to have to be taken as seriously as he is taken here.
For instance, let's take the very first link presented here as proof of Q and Trump's connection.
https://qanon.pub/data/proofs/01b6f3c7b899e31528bf3355bd28f666957ecd7490ec8263a2ce562602ffaeb3.jpg
Trump says "tip top" and then emphasizes it with "tippy top" into the State of the Union after it was requested by Q supporters. The timestamps prove it.
Wow. That... is pretty compelling.
Assuming, of course, that Trump isn't a fan of using such an odd expression as "tippy top" before his use of it for the 2018 State of the Union. Assuming that "tip top" was not a usual part of Trump's vocabulary before 2018.
So has Trump weirdly emphasized "tippy top" before 2018, when this proof occurred?
Yes. This YouTube video was uploaded in 2016, from a rally two years before this proof occurred. And Trump makes a big emphasis not just on "tip top" but "tippy top."
https://youtu.be/ypYy-WMuyiU?t=6080
Could it still be evidence, since we can't prove Trump WASN'T communicating with Q people?
I guess, but I would counter it was far more likely that whoever made that ping request simply predicted Trump's somewhat unique language, because everyone who is a fan of Trump tends to adopt his expressions, even without realizing it.
And the fact that Q endorsed this makes me feel more like Q took advantage of a likely coincidence of Trump's language to establish credibility, not that Q's credibility was actually established. Q wasn't even involved in the original prediction. As far as I can tell, he just took credit for it after it came true.
"Tippy top" was an established Trumpism before the proof occurred, so the strength of this evidence has diminished significantly. All it took to research this was a quick search of transcripts for the use of the word I was wondering about, and then searching YouTube for the speech. Which, was conveniently labeled and I could have saved myself the time, I guess.
And for someone who isn't me, that would be enough for me to raise an eyebrow at the rest of the links on this list and think it's not worth going further.
I'm not going to sit here and try to debunk every proof presented, but anyone who you present these proof to will, and if they're halfway competent, they will perform these exact same checks on your sources.
You may want to run those checks yourself on every single proof and see if the underlying assumptions you're making (such as the notion of "tippy top" being some weird, unique signal that has no other reason to be uttered by Trump) will hold up when someone isn't willing to give the proof the benefit of the doubt.
I don't even claim it as bullshit. I just say that it's really hard to walk up to people and claim that any of this is proof that Q is military intelligence or has the credibility that he claims to have to be taken as seriously as he is taken here.
For instance, let's take the very first link presented here as proof of Q and Trump's connection.
https://qanon.pub/data/proofs/01b6f3c7b899e31528bf3355bd28f666957ecd7490ec8263a2ce562602ffaeb3.jpg
Trump says "tip top" and then emphasizes it with "tippy top" into the State of the Union after it was requested by Q supporters. The timestamps prove it.
Wow. That... is pretty compelling.
Assuming, of course, that Trump isn't a fan of using such an odd expression as "tippy top" before his use of it for the 2018 State of the Union. Assuming that "tip top" was not a usual part of Trump's vocabulary before 2018.
So has Trump weirdly emphasized "tippy top" before 2018, when this proof occurred?
Yes. This YouTube video was uploaded in 2016, from a rally two years before this proof occurred. And Trump makes a big emphasis not just on "tip top" but "tippy top."
https://youtu.be/ypYy-WMuyiU?t=6080
Could it still be evidence, since we can't prove Trump WASN'T communicating with Q people?
I guess, but I would counter it was far more likely that whoever made that ping request simply predicted Trump's somewhat unique language, because everyone who is a fan of Trump tends to adopt his expressions, even without realizing it.
And the fact that Q endorsed this makes me feel more like Q took advantage of a likely coincidence of Trump's language to establish credibility, not that Q's credibility was actually established. Q wasn't even involved in the original prediction. As far as I can tell, he just took credit for it after it came true.
"Tippy top" was an established Trumpism before the proof occurred, so the strength of this evidence has diminished significantly. All it took to research this was a quick search of transcripts for the use of the word I was wondering about, and then searching YouTube for the speech. Which, was conveniently labeled and I could have saved myself the time, I guess.
And for someone who isn't me, that would be enough for me to raise an eyebrow at the rest of the links on this list and think it's not worth going further.
I'm not going to sit here and try to debunk every proof presented, but anyone who you present these proof to will, and if they're halfway competent, do these exact same checks on your sources. You may want to run those checks yourself on every single proof and see if the underlying assumptions you're making (such as the notion of "tippy top" being some weird, unique signal that has no other reason to be uttered by Trump) will hold up when someone isn't willing to give the proof the benefit of the doubt.
I don't even claim it as bullshit. I just say that it's really hard to walk up to people and claim that any of this is proof that Q is military intelligence or has the credibility that he claims to have to be taken as seriously as he is taken here.
For instance, let's take the very first link presented here as proof of Q and Trump's connection.
https://qanon.pub/data/proofs/01b6f3c7b899e31528bf3355bd28f666957ecd7490ec8263a2ce562602ffaeb3.jpg
Trump says "tip top" and then emphasizes it with "tippy top" into the State of the Union after it was requested by Q supporters. The timestamps prove it.
Wow. That... is pretty compelling.
Assuming, of course, that Trump isn't a fan of using such an odd expression as "tippy top" before his use of it for the 2018 State of the Union. Assuming that "tip top" was not a usual part of Trump's vocabulary before 2018.
So has Trump weirdly emphasized "tippy top" before 2018, when this proof occurred?
Yes. This YouTube video was uploaded in 2016, from a rally two years before this proof occurred. And Trump makes a big emphasis not just on "tip top" but "tippy top."
https://youtu.be/ypYy-WMuyiU?t=6080
Could it still be evidence, since we can't prove Trump WASN'T communicating with Q people?
I guess, but I would counter it was far more likely that whoever made that ping request simply predicted Trump's somewhat unique language, because everyone who is a fan of Trump tends to adopt his expressions, even without realizing it.
And the fact that Q endorsed this makes me feel more like Q took advantage of a likely coincidence of Trump's language to establish credibility, not that Q's credibility was actually established. Q wasn't even involved in the original prediction. He just took credit for it after it came true.
"Tippy top" was an established Trumpism before the proof occurred, so the strength of this evidence has diminished significantly. All it took to research this was a quick search of transcripts for the use of the word I was wondering about, and then searching YouTube for the speech. Which, was conveniently labeled and I could have saved myself the time, I guess.
And for someone who isn't me, that would be enough for me to raise an eyebrow at the rest of the links on this list and think it's not worth going further.
I'm not going to sit here and try to debunk every proof presented, but anyone who you present these proof to will, and if they're halfway competent, do these exact same checks on your sources. You may want to run those checks yourself on every single proof and see if the underlying assumptions you're making (such as the notion of "tippy top" being some weird, unique signal that has no other reason to be uttered by Trump) will hold up when someone isn't willing to give the proof the benefit of the doubt.
I don't even claim it as bullshit. I just say that it's really hard to walk up to people and claim that any of this is proof that Q is military intelligence or has the credibility that he claims to have to be taken as seriously as he is taken here.
For instance, let's take the very first link presented here as proof of Q and Trump's connection.
https://qanon.pub/data/proofs/01b6f3c7b899e31528bf3355bd28f666957ecd7490ec8263a2ce562602ffaeb3.jpg
Trump says "tip top" and then emphasizes it with "tippy top" into the State of the Union after it was requested by Q supporters. The timestamps prove it.
Wow. That... is pretty compelling.
Assuming, of course, that Trump isn't a fan of using such an odd expression as "tippy top" before his use of it for the 2018 State of the Union. Assuming that "tip top" was not a usual part of Trump's vocabulary before 2018.
So has Trump weirdly emphasized "tippy top" before 2018, when this proof occurred?
Yes. This YouTube video was uploaded in 2016, from a rally two years before this proof occurred. And Trump makes a big emphasis not just on "tip top" but "tippy top."
https://youtu.be/ypYy-WMuyiU?t=6080
Could it still be evidence, since we can't prove Trump WASN'T communicating with Q people?
I guess, but I would counter it was far more likely that whoever made that ping request simply predicted Trump's somewhat unique language, because everyone who is a fan of Trump tends to adopt his expressions, even without realizing it.
And the fact that Q endorsed this makes me feel more like Q took advantage of a likely coincidence of Trump's language to establish credibility, not that Q's credibility was actually established.
"Tippy top" was an established Trumpism before the proof occurred, so the strength of this evidence has diminished significantly. All it took to research this was a quick search of transcripts for the use of the word I was wondering about, and then searching YouTube for the speech. Which, was conveniently labeled and I could have saved myself the time, I guess.
And for someone who isn't me, that would be enough for me to raise an eyebrow at the rest of the links on this list and think it's not worth going further.
I'm not going to sit here and try to debunk every proof presented, but anyone who you present these proof to will, and if they're halfway competent, do these exact same checks on your sources. You may want to run those checks yourself on every single proof and see if the underlying assumptions you're making (such as the notion of "tippy top" being some weird, unique signal that has no other reason to be uttered by Trump) will hold up when someone isn't willing to give the proof the benefit of the doubt.
I don't even claim it as bullshit. I just say that it's really hard to walk up to people and claim that any of this is proof that Q is military intelligence or has the credibility that he claims to have to be taken as seriously as he is taken here.
For instance, let's take the very first link presented here as proof of Q and Trump's connection.
https://qanon.pub/data/proofs/01b6f3c7b899e31528bf3355bd28f666957ecd7490ec8263a2ce562602ffaeb3.jpg
Trump says "tip top" and then emphasizes it with "tippy top" into the State of the Union after it was requested by Q supporters. The timestamps prove it.
Wow. That... is pretty compelling.
Assuming, of course, that Trump isn't a fan of using such an odd expression as "tippy top" before his use of it for the 2018 State of the Union. Assuming that "tip top" was not a usual part of Trump's vocabulary before 2018.
So has Trump weirdly emphasized "tippy top" before 2018, when this proof occurred?
Yes. This YouTube video was uploaded in 2016, from a rally two years before this proof occurred. And Trump makes a big emphasis not just on "tip top" but "tippy top."
https://youtu.be/ypYy-WMuyiU?t=6080
Could it still be evidence, since we can't prove Trump WASN'T communicating with Q people? I guess, but I would counter it was far more likely that whoever made that ping request simply predicted Trump's somewhat unique language, because everyone who is a fan of Trump tends to adopt his expressions, even without realizing it.
"Tippy top" was an established Trumpism before the proof occurred, so the strength of this evidence has diminished significantly. All it took to research this was a quick search of transcripts for the use of the word I was wondering about, and then searching YouTube for the speech. Which, was conveniently labeled and I could have saved myself the time, I guess.
And for someone who isn't me, that would be enough for me to raise an eyebrow at the rest of the links on this list and think it's not worth going further.
I'm not going to sit here and try to debunk every proof presented, but anyone who you present these proof to will, and if they're halfway competent, do these exact same checks on your sources. You may want to run those checks yourself on every single proof and see if the underlying assumptions you're making (such as the notion of "tippy top" being some weird, unique signal that has no other reason to be uttered by Trump) will hold up when someone isn't willing to give the proof the benefit of the doubt.