Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring more of a central figure or collective group of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable (sometimes used interchangeably, but most of the time as a defined figure or group rather than a worldwide phenomenon). Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous" as a single person, or a collective body, doesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a central figure or group of people that attracts a certain set of people on the internet that are basically "conspiracy theorists", which of course is a dirty term to most. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it may not be a central figure or group, just like "Anonymous" wasn't, no one knows. That was a little too much to have to spoon-feed you, but that's okay. You could not assume and be open to learn.. but anyway, the identity of Q is not important honestly, but to the media its driving them fucking insane, and rightly so. Let them keep chasing ghosts and making up a pop subculture to market off of, either way, NCSWIC.

Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring more of a central figure or collective group of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable (sometimes used interchangeably, but most of the time as a defined figure or group rather than a worldwide phenomenon). Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous" as a single person, or a collective body, doesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a central figure or group of people that attracts a certain set of people on the internet that are basically "conspiracy theorists", which of course is a dirty term to most. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it may not be a central figure or group, just like "Anonymous" wasn't. That was a little too much to have to spoon-feed you, but that's okay. You could not assume and be open to learn.. the identity of Q is not important honestly, but to the media its driving them fucking insane, and rightly so. Let them keep chasing ghosts and making up a pop subculture to market off of, either way, NCSWIC.

Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring more of a central figure or collective group of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable (sometimes used interchangeably, but most of the time as a defined figure or group rather than a worldwide phenomenon). Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous" as a single person, or a collective body, doesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a central figure or group of people that attracts a certain set of people on the internet that are basically "conspiracy theorists", which of course is a dirty term to most. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it's probably not a central figure, just like "Anonymous" wasn't. That was a little too much to have to spoon-feed you, but that's okay. You could not assume and be open to learn.. the identity of Q is not important honestly, but to the media its driving them fucking insane, and rightly so. Let them keep chasing ghosts and making up a pop subculture to market off of, either way, NCSWIC.

Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring more of a central figure or collective group of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable (sometimes used interchangeably, but most of the time as a defined figure or group rather than a worldwide phenomenon). Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous* as a single person, or a collective body, doesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a central figure or group of people that attracts a certain set of people on the internet that are basically "conspiracy theorists", which of course is a dirty term to most. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it's probably not a central figure, just like "Anonymous" wasn't. That was a little too much to have to spoon-feed you, but that's okay. You could not assume and be open to learn.. the identity of Q is not important honestly, but to the media its driving them fucking insane, and rightly so. Let them keep chasing ghosts and making up a pop subculture to market off of, either way, NCSWIC.

Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring more of a central figure it group rather than collective mentality of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable (sometimes used interchangeably, but most of the time as a defined figure). Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous* as a single person, or a collective body, doesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a central figure that has another collective mentality group on the internet full of conspiracy theorists. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it's probably not a central figure, just like "Anonymous" wasn't. That was a little too much to have to spoon-feed you, but that's okay. You could not assume and be open to learn.. the identity of Q is not important honestly, but to the media its driving them fucking insane, and rightly so. Let them keep chasing ghosts and making up a pop subculture to market off of, either way, NCSWIC.

Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring a collective mentality of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable. Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous* as a single person, or a collective body, doesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a central figure that has another collective mentality group on the internet full of conspiracy theorists. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it's probably not a central figure, just like "Anonymous" wasn't. That was a little too much to have to spoon-feed you, but that's okay. You could not assume and be open to learn.. the identity of Q is not important honestly, but to the media its driving them fucking insane, and rightly so. Let them keep chasing ghosts and making up a pop subculture to market off of, either way, NCSWIC.

Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring a collective mentality of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable. Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous* as a single person, or a collective body, doesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a fringe collective mentality on the internet full of conspiracy theorists. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it's probably not a central figure, just like "Anonymous" wasn't. That was a little too much to have to spoon-feed you, but that's okay. You could not assume and be open to learn.. the identity of Q is not important honestly, but to the media its driving them fucking insane, and rightly so. Let them keep chasing ghosts and making up a pop subculture to market off of, either way, NCSWIC.

Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring a collective mentality of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable. Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous* as a single person, or a collective body, doesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a fringe collective mentality on the internet full of conspiracy theorists. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it's probably not a central figure, just like "Anonymous" wasn't. That was a little too much to have to spoon-feed you, but that's okay. You could not assume and be open to learn.. the identity of Q is not important honestly, but to the media is driving them fucking insane, and rightly so.

Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring a collective mentality of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable. Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous* as a single person, or a collective body, doesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a fringe collective mentality on the internet full of conspiracy theorists. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it's probably not a central figure, just like "Anonymous" wasn't. That was a little too much to have to spoon-feed you, but that's okay. You could not assume and be open to learn..

Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring a collective mentality of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable. Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous* as a single person, or a collective body, doesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a fringe collective mentality on the internet full of conspiracy theorists. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it's probably not a central figure, just like "Anonymous" wasn't. That was too much to have to spoon-feed you. You could not assume and be open to learn..

Being on the chans, it's implied that you are an "anon". Actually, the name is "Anonymous", unless you decide to be a namefag purely out of egotistical reasons. After the initial Ron Paul movement and the events surrounding that time in what I would consider the first internet "awakening", it became the term hijacked by feds and twisted in the media as the boogeyman guy fawkes face that you see as "we do not forgive, we do not forget", inferring a collective mentality of certain "fringe" internet users that were behind seeking the truth and holding politicians accountable. Not one time did anyone intentionally identify themselves as "Anonymous". Also, there is no "we" attribute to any of this. In fact, "Anonymous* as a single person, or a collective body, oesn't exist, and neither does "QAnon". It's the same tactic being applied to dismay people and have them believe that, yet again, "QAnon" is a fringe collective mentality on the internet full of conspiracy theorists. Technically, "Q" in the sense that we use it to refer to the intelligence drops posted honestly doesn't infer it's one single person, even if it's an actual person at all. It's actually a pseudonym if anything. And I'm reality, it's probably not a central figure, just like "Anonymous" wasn't. That was too much to have to spoon-feed you, seriously.