Wow, I never realized that VOAT garnered it on research paper until I stumbled across this: (Think they are doing to same dataset collection on this board?)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2201.05933.pdf
Papasavva et al. [25] collect 0.5M posts from /v/GreatAwakening, /v/news, /v/politics, /v/funny, and /v/AskVoat to provide an empirical exploratory analysis of the QAnon community on Voat. They find, among other things, that /v/GreatAwakening is not as toxic as the general discus-sion subverses. Last, Aliapoulios et al. [4] compare Voat’s /v/GreatAwakening and /v/news posts to 4chan, 8kun, Reddit, and Q drops (posts posted by “Q,” the mastermind behind the QAnon conspiracy theory) on a large scale study on QAnon. They find that Voat posts are as threatening as Q drops and that content creators on Reddit and Voat only consist of a small portion of the total community
Wow, I never realized that VOAT garnered it on research paper until I stumbled across this: