Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Your reply is so... separatist. You seem to feel the need to define strict boundaries and hierarchies. Why? I'm not saying classification is not useful, but to suggest it is definitive is so limiting. In other words, there is a difference between "useful" and Truth.

I Am.

We All Are.

Yes, we have our own existence, but where the lines are between us and That Which Is are a contrivance to aid in our understanding, i.e. they are useful not Truth. Perhaps those lines we define are purely by choice. Can we choose different levels of "separateness"? I.e. can we actually be closer to someone, or closer to everyone, or closer to "the oneness"? I suggest probably.

So perhaps defining things in terms of "perfect" and "quintessential" and "Perfect perfects" in so strict a fashion may be a desire for your own peace of mind, and not an honest effort at understanding the Truth.

The Truth Is That Which Is.

While we can see the door, only those who have stepped through the threshold can even begin to ponder what lies beyond. These are the Revelators, and among them Jesus is the First, not chronologically, but First in authority, which is a novel concept.

Limits and hierarchies...

Limit less --> Limitless.

Hierarch less --> Hierarchless???

Whatever; Flatten the Pyramid.

Be That Which Is. Which is what You already are.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Your reply is so... separatist. You seem to feel the need to define strict boundaries and hierarchies. Why? I'm not saying classification is not useful, but to suggest it is definitive is so limiting. In other words, there is a difference between "useful" and Truth.

I Am.

We All Are.

Yes, we have our own existence, but where the lines are between us and That Which Is are a contrivance to aid in our understanding, i.e. they are useful not Truth. Perhaps those lines we define are purely by choice. Can we choose different levels of "separateness"? I.e. can we actually be closer to someone, or closer to everyone, or closer to "the oneness"? I suggest probably.

So perhaps defining things in terms of "perfect" and "quintessential" and "Perfect perfects" in so strict a fashion may be a desire for your own peace of mind, and not an honest effort at understanding the Truth.

The Truth Is That Which Is.

While we can see the door, only those who have stepped through the threshold can even begin to ponder what lies beyond. These are the Revelators, and among them Jesus is the First, not chronologically, but First in authority, which is a novel concept.

Limits and hierarchies...

Limit less --> Limitless.

Be That Which Is. Which is what You already are.

2 years ago
1 score