God has chosen those with limits to be the greater authority.

How can you possibly say something like this? Where is your evidence?

Limitations breed invention and innovation.

Invention and innovation to overcome limits are proof that the limit didn't exist in the first place.

My point is, that without hierarchies, then in what way might things be known as themselves?

A thing simply Is. We create the definition, and in that definition we never fully capture a thing. A part of my report is titled "There Is No Spoon". It shows, albeit without math, how all things are one thing. The Spoon as we define it is not just a metal object with a handle and a small round bowl. It is not just a clump of various elements put together in such a way as to have specific properties. It is not just a bunch of intersecting waves of probability, or overlapping vibrations of the aether, it is all of those things and all of the things that I have not said. It is fundamentally connected to all other things in the Universe. It can't be separated except by our own desire to make it separate so that we can understand a small part of it, and make it useful to us.

We define, and hierarch. We separate based on properties. The things themselves simply are, and they themselves can't be separated. Is "Oxygen" *more" than "Hydrogen" in some definitive sense? Not at all. They are the same thing. You could call Oxygen 16 clumped Hydrogens and it would be more appropriate than calling it "Oxygen". But in either case, we are making the distinction. The universe, That Which Is, knows no such distinction.

Once we start defining, we limit ourselves to these definitions. We have no limits, because we are a part of That Which Is. Our only real boundaries are That Which Is. I have no idea what That Which Is is, so I have no idea where the real boundaries lie. If That Which Is really is infinite (I don't really know what that means either), then there are no boundaries for us, except those which we believe to be there.

Separations of powers MUST exist, because we see it in Creation all over the place.

Do we? I don't. Perhaps you do. Makes you think right?

If all things were to collapse and be purely equal, without limitations to separate them, then there would be no discernable Universe.

Who said anything about equal? Hierarchies are not the only way to separate. Choosing a hierarchy is your choice. I could create a completely different one for the same set of objects depending on how I define "what is better," or even based on what properties I am aware of existing within something; properties you may not be aware of.

hierarchical levels of authority

I suggest this is the fraud in your training (a fraud in everyone's training). This is the primary teaching that gives The Matrix its power, and it has been going on for a long time.

There is no such thing as "authority." If you eliminate that concept from your mindset, the world looks very different. Just try it for a few days.

God has chosen those with limits to be the greater authority.

How can you possibly say something like this? Where is your evidence?

Limitations breed invention and innovation.

Invention and innovation to overcome limits are proof that the limit didn't exist in the first place.

My point is, that without hierarchies, then in what way might things be known as themselves?

A thing simply Is. We create the definition, and in that definition we never fully capture a thing. A part of my report is titled "There Is No Spoon". It shows, albeit without math, how all things are one thing. The Spoon as we define it is not just a metal object with a handle and a small round bowl. It is not just a clump of various elements put together in such a way as to have specific properties. It is not just a bunch of intersecting waves of probability, or overlapping vibrations of the aether, it is all of those things and all of the things that I have not said. It is fundamentally connected to all other things in the Universe. It can't be separated except by our own desire to make it separate so that we can understand a small part of it, and make it useful.

We define, and hierarch. We separate based on properties. The things themselves simply are, and they themselves can't be separated. Is "Oxygen" *more" than "Hydrogen" in some definitive sense? Not at all. They are the same thing. You could call Oxygen 16 clumped Hydrogens and it would be more appropriate than calling it "Oxygen". But in either case, we are making the distinction. The universe, That Which Is, knows no such distinction.

Once we start defining, we limit ourselves to these definitions. We have no limits, because we are a part of That Which Is. Our only real boundaries are That Which Is. I have no idea what That Which Is is, so I have no idea where the real boundaries lie. If That Which Is really is infinite (I don't really know what that means either), then there are no boundaries for us, except those which we believe to be there.

Separations of powers MUST exist, because we see it in Creation all over the place.

Do we? I don't. Perhaps you do. Makes you think right?

If all things were to collapse and be purely equal, without limitations to separate them, then there would be no discernable Universe.

Who said anything about equal? Hierarchies are not the only way to separate. Choosing a hierarchy is your choice. I could create a completely different one for the same set of objects depending on how I define "what is better," or even based on what properties I am aware of existing within something; properties you may not be aware of.

hierarchical levels of authority

I suggest this is the fraud in your training (a fraud in everyone's training). This is the primary teaching that gives The Matrix its power, and it has been going on for a long time.

There is no such thing as "authority." If you eliminate that concept from your mindset, the world looks very different. Just try it for a few days.

God has chosen those with limits to be the greater authority.

How can you possibly say something like this? Where is your evidence?

Limitations breed invention and innovation.

Invention and innovation are proof that the limit didn't exist in the first place.

My point is, that without hierarchies, then in what way might things be known as themselves?

A thing simply Is. We create the definition, and in that definition we never fully capture a thing. A part of my report is titled "There Is No Spoon". It shows, albeit without math, how all things are one thing. The Spoon as we define it is not just a metal object with a handle and a small round bowl. It is not just a clump of various elements put together in such a way as to have specific properties. It is not just a bunch of intersecting waves of probability, or overlapping vibrations of the aether, it is all of those things and all of the things that I have not said. It is fundamentally connected to all other things in the Universe. It can't be separated except by our own desire to make it separate so that we can understand a small part of it, and make it useful.

We define, and hierarch. We separate based on properties. The things themselves simply are, and they themselves can't be separated. Is "Oxygen" *more" than "Hydrogen" in some definitive sense? Not at all. They are the same thing. You could call Oxygen 16 clumped Hydrogens and it would be more appropriate than calling it "Oxygen". But in either case, we are making the distinction. The universe, That Which Is, knows no such distinction.

Once we start defining, we limit ourselves to these definitions. We have no limits, because we are a part of That Which Is. Our only real boundaries are That Which Is. I have no idea what That Which Is is, so I have no idea where the real boundaries lie. If That Which Is really is infinite (I don't really know what that means either), then there are no boundaries for us, except those which we believe to be there.

Separations of powers MUST exist, because we see it in Creation all over the place.

Do we? I don't. Perhaps you do. Makes you think right?

If all things were to collapse and be purely equal, without limitations to separate them, then there would be no discernable Universe.

Who said anything about equal? Hierarchies are not the only way to separate. Choosing a hierarchy is your choice. I could create a completely different one for the same set of objects depending on how I define "what is better," or even based on what properties I am aware of existing within something; properties you may not be aware of.

hierarchical levels of authority

I suggest this is the fraud in your training (a fraud in everyone's training). This is the primary teaching that gives The Matrix its power, and it has been going on for a long time.

There is no such thing as "authority." If you eliminate that concept from your mindset, the world looks very different. Just try it for a few days.