Yes yes, that's the whole bloody point of this post though, if he's supposed to be a double agent, why would he be welcoming the Russians?

Did you even read the post?

It looks like your objecting to people speculating and theory crafting on Zelenskies actions.

This whole post by OP is a speculation on the actor zelensky being a double flop, he's following all the orders he's being given by the DS so as to expose them at a later date. The narrative doesn't work if he breaks ranks early.

If zelensky did as you suggested from the start, the narrative around him and Ukraine would be completely different.

If the goal is to reach mass Awakening people must see the corruption unequivocally.

Please note I haven't said I believe the theory itself.

Just that your argument doesn't make sense in the context of what OP is laying out.

You appear to be saying
"Zelensky can't be a double agent because he did these things"

While OP is saying

"Despite what we see there is more to the situation if you scratch the surface level actions"

Your arguments says it impossible that a double agent would let bad things happen and that if he was working for the whitehats he would have done XYZ and never would have let ABC happen.

Please note I did not say he is a whitehat either, just that the theory requires you entertain the notion that the whitehats have taken control or the means of control over certain world leaders. ie "Strings have been cut"

Yes yes, that's the whole bloody point of this post though, if he's supposed to be a double agent, why would he be welcoming the Russians?

Did you even read the post?

It looks like your objecting to people speculating and theory crafting on Zelenskies actions.

This whole post by OP is a speculation on the actor zelensky being a double flop, he's following all the orders he's being given by the DS so as to expose them at a later date. The narrative doesn't work if he breaks ranks early.

If zelensky did as you suggested from the start, the narrative around him and Ukraine would be completely different.

If the goal is to reach mass Awakening people must see the corruption unequivocally.

Please note I haven't said I believe the theory itself.

Just that your argument doesn't make sense in the context of what OP is laying out.

"Zelensky can't be a double agent because he did these things"

While OP is saying

"Despite what we see there is more to the situation if you scratch the surface level actions"

Your arguments says it impossible that a double agent would let bad things happen and that if he was working for the whitehats he would have done XYZ and never would have let ABC happen.

Please note I did not say he is a whitehat either, just that the theory requires you entertain the notion that the whitehats have taken control or the means of control over certain world leaders. ie "Strings have been cut"