Why have we never been to the moon again?
Because our world is micromanaged by the PTB. For whatever reason, they didn't want us to go back. It is even possible some of the footage from the moon landing was faked because of what was really found there. I'm not saying I think that is true, but it's possible and it does have some (small) evidential support.
If we are on a spinning globe. Why are there no pictures from space from under the earth (looking from below up to earth?
Which side is "under"? What does it mean to be "below the Earth"?
Which side is the "bottom" of a ball? How does that question make any sense to you?
If you mean pictures from the south pole, any picture of the South Pole from "above" is a picture of the Earth from "Below". Though from the perspective of America, any picture of Australia (or more likely, somewhere in the Indian Ocean) would be "below". As for fuckery of pictures of the South Pole, there is substantial evidence that there is a whole bunch of hidden shit there, so maybe that is why there are insufficient pictures of "below" to suit your needs.
It is also more difficult to get into a high orbit (hundreds of thousands of miles away) over the North/South poles because of the rotation of the Earth, the Earth's plane of orbit around the Sun (as well as all the other planets) and how we launch, so maybe that is what you mean? We would never launch something super high above a pole, because that is not a direction to anywhere interesting in our solar system, and there are no stable orbits there.
Just have an open mind.
I have a very open mind. I have looked at the evidence of flat earth and all of it does not match with experiment. I have looked at the most recent promoter of Flat Earth (Eric Dubay) and he is almost certainly a CIA operative, purposefully putting out disinformation to discredit those that "have an open mind."
yes they are also knowledgeable about the body
Doctors in my experience know jack shit about cellular and molecular biology (there are certianly some exceptions to that statement), which is what "medicine" is (vernacular). They get all of their information from pharma. They are taught enough to read pharma papers. That's the extent of their knowledge about biology. Do they know anatomy? Sure. Do they know how to take body parts off? Sure. Do they understand the nitty gritty of the human body? Not even in the slightest. They are fucking morons when it comes to that topic (again, in general, not specifically). Doctors know jack and shit and jack left town.
I do not blame them. I know what they are taught in medical school (and premed) and it is not what they need to know how to heal. They are taught how to rely on the system themselves, and how to keep their patients dependent on the system.
So is the earth a ball floating in outer space spinning ridiculously fast?
All evidence suggests the answer to this is yes. I have looked quite a bit into this, and not one shred of evidence that says otherwise stands up to debate. Not one.
Now that doesn't mean I really know what it means to say "we are on a ball floating in "outer space" spinning (not really all that fast)." That last seems to be a misconception. There is a force due to spin (centrifugal) that pulls us outward. That force goes as v^2/R, where v = 1000mph = 447m/s and R = 6370 km = 6370000m.
Therefore v*2/R = 447^2/6,370,000 = 0.03m/s^2. Gravity = 9.81m/s^2 which rounds off to 9.8m/s^2
The "loss" of gravity due to spinning (at the equator, where it is highest) is 0.03 = 9.77m/s^2 which rounds off to 9.8m/s^2.
Going between the poles and the equator (the two extremes) you don't notice a thing.
Ask questions, don’t discount your intuition.
There is a difference between discounting your intuition, and believing it is telling you the truth (i.e. relying on it at the expense of the evidence).
Do we need vaccines to survive and be safe.. clearly not.
This is a false equivalence and a primary trap of The Matrix. It is exactly how a CIA operative can put out information about "Flat Earth" and capture (and discredit) those that are willing to question the narrative. Just because one things someone says is a lie, doesn't mean *all" things someone says is a lie. If that were the case, this whole thing would be easy. Finding out which parts are true, and which parts are misrepresentations is the difficult part. It is not straight forward, and there is no simple formula you can follow to find all the fuckery. Each step must be tread carefully.
Beliefs are the Key!
Beliefs are the fraud. If you "believe" you lose the ability to see evidence to the contrary to your beliefs. Allowing yourself to look at all evidence in earnest is the Key. Believing you already know the truth prevents you from using that key.
Hope I didn’t offend anyone
Speaking your truth is never offensive. Not listening to others when they do it is.
Why have we never been to the moon again?
Because our world is micromanaged by the PTB. For whatever reason, they didn't want us to go back. It is even possible some of the footage from the moon landing was faked because of what was really found there. I'm not saying I think that is true, but it's possible and it does have some (small) evidential support.
If we are on a spinning globe. Why are there no pictures from space from under the earth (looking from below up to earth?
Which side is "under"? What does it mean to be "below the Earth"?
Which side is the "bottom" of a ball? How does that question make any sense to you?
If you mean pictures from the south pole, any picture of the South Pole from "above" is a picture of the Earth from "Below". Though from the perspective of America, any picture of Australia (or more likely, somewhere in the Indian Ocean) would be "below". As for fuckery of pictures of the South Pole, there is substantial evidence that there is a whole bunch of hidden shit there, so maybe that is why there are insufficient pictures of "below" to suit your needs.
It is also more difficult to get into a high orbit (hundreds of thousands of miles away) over the North/South poles because of the rotation of the Earth, the Earth's plane of orbit around the Sun (as well as all the other planets) and how we launch, so maybe that is what you mean? We would never launch something super high above a pole, because that is not a direction to anywhere interesting in our solar system, and there are no stable orbits there.
Just have an open mind.
I have a very open mind. I have looked at the evidence of flat earth and all of it does not match with experiment. I have looked at the most recent promoter of Flat Earth (Eric Dubay) and he is almost certainly a CIA operative, purposefully putting out disinformation to discredit those that "have an open mind."
yes they are also knowledgeable about the body
Doctors in my experience know jack shit about cellular and molecular biology (there are certianly some exceptions to that statement), which is what "medicine" is (vernacular). They get all of their information from pharma. They are taught enough to read pharma papers. That's the extent of their knowledge about biology. Do they know anatomy? Sure. Do they know how to take body parts off? Sure. Do they understand the nitty gritty of the human body? Not even in the slightest. They are fucking morons when it comes to that topic (again, in general, not specifically). Doctors know jack and shit and jack left town.
I do not blame them. I know what they are taught in medical school (and premed) and it is not what they need to know how to heal. They are taught how to rely on the system themselves, and how to keep their patients dependent on the system.
So is the earth a ball floating in outer space spinning ridiculously fast?
All evidence suggests the answer to this is yes. I have looked quite a bit into this, and not one shred of evidence that says otherwise stands up to debate. Not one.
Now that doesn't mean I really know what it means to say "we are on a ball floating in "outer space" spinning (not really all that fast)." That last seems to be a misconception. There is a force due to spin (centrifugal) that pulls us outward. That force goes as v^2/R, where v = 1000mph = 447m/s and R = 6370 km = 6370000m.
Therefore v*2/R = 447^2/6,370,000 = 0.03m/s^2. Gravity = 9.81m/s^2 which rounds off to 9.8m/s^2
The "loss" of gravity due to spinning (at the equator, where it is highest) is 0.03 = 9.77m/s^2 which rounds off to 9.8m/s^2.
Going between the poles and the equator (the two extremes) you don't notice a thing.
Ask questions, don’t discount your intuition.
There is a difference between discounting your intuition, and believing it is telling you the truth (i.e. relying on it at the expense of the evidence).
Do we need vaccines to survive and be safe.. clearly not.
This is a false equivalence and a primary trap of The Matrix. It is exactly how a CIA operative can put out information about "Flat Earth" and capture (and discredit) those that are willing to question the narrative. Just because one things someone says is a lie, doesn't mean *all" things someone says is a lie. If that were the case, this whole thing would be easy. Finding out which parts are true, and which parts are misrepresentations is the difficult part. It is not straight forward, and there is no simple formula you can follow to find all the fuckery. Each step must be tread carefully.
Beliefs are the Key!
Beliefs are the fraud. If you "believe" you lose the ability to see evidence of the contrary to your beliefs. Allowing yourself to look at all evidence in earnest is the Key. Believing you already know the truth prevents you from using that key.
Hope I didn’t offend anyone
Speaking your truth is never offensive. Not listening to others when they do it is.
Why have we never been to the moon again?
Because our world is micromanaged by the PTB. For whatever reason, they didn't want us to go back. It is even possible some of the footage from the moon landing was faked because of what was really found there. I'm not saying I think that is true, but it's possible and it does have some (small) evidential support.
If we are on a spinning globe. Why are there no pictures from space from under the earth (looking from below up to earth?
Which side is "under"? What does it mean to be "below the Earth"?
Which side is the "bottom" of a ball? How does that question make any sense to you?
If you mean pictures from the south pole, any picture of the South Pole from "above" is a picture of the Earth from "Below". Though from the perspective of America, any picture of Australia (or more likely, somewhere in the Indian Ocean) would be "below". As for fuckery of pictures of the South Pole, there is substantial evidence that there is a whole bunch of hidden shit there, so maybe that is why there are insufficient pictures of "below" to suit your needs.
It is also more difficult to get into a high orbit (hundreds of thousands of miles away) over the North/South poles because of the rotation of the Earth, the Earth's plane of orbit around the Sun (as well as all the other planets) and how we launch, so maybe that is what you mean? We would never launch something super high above a pole, because that is not a direction to anywhere interesting in our solar system, and there are no stable orbits there.
Just have an open mind.
I have a very open mind. I have looked at the evidence of flat earth and all of it does not match with experiment. I have looked at the most recent promoter of Flat Earth (Eric Dubay) and he is almost certainly a CIA operative, purposefully putting out disinformation to discredit those that "have an open mind."
yes they are also knowledgeable about the body
Doctors in my experience know jack shit about cellular and molecular biology (there are certianly some exceptions to that statement), which is what "medicine" is (vernacular). They get all of their information from pharma. They are taught enough to read pharma papers. That's the extent of their knowledge about biology. Do they know anatomy? Sure. Do they know how to take body parts off? Sure. Do they understand the nitty gritty of the human body? Not even in the slightest. They are fucking morons when it comes to that topic (again, in general, not specifically). Doctors know jack and shit and jack left town.
I do not blame them. I know what they are taught in medical school (and premed) and it is not what they need to know how to heal, but what they need to know to keep people dependent on the system.
So is the earth a ball floating in outer space spinning ridiculously fast?
All evidence suggests the answer to this is yes. I have looked quite a bit into this, and not one shred of evidence that says otherwise stands up to debate. Not one.
Now that doesn't mean I really know what it means to say "we are on a ball floating in "outer space" spinning (not really all that fast)." That last seems to be a misconception. There is a force due to spin (centrifugal) that pulls us outward. That force goes as v^2/R, where v = 1000mph = 447m/s and R = 6370 km = 6370000m.
Therefore v*2/R = 447^2/6,370,000 = 0.03m/s^2. Gravity = 9.81m/s^2 which rounds off to 9.8m/s^2
The "loss" of gravity due to spinning (at the equator, where it is highest) is 0.03 = 9.77m/s^2 which rounds off to 9.8m/s^2.
Going between the poles and the equator (the two extremes) you don't notice a thing.
Ask questions, don’t discount your intuition.
There is a difference between discounting your intuition, and believing it is telling you the truth (i.e. relying on it at the expense of the evidence).
Do we need vaccines to survive and be safe.. clearly not.
This is a false equivalence and a primary trap of The Matrix. It is exactly how a CIA operative can put out information about "Flat Earth" and capture (and discredit) those that are willing to question the narrative. Just because one things someone says is a lie, doesn't mean *all" things someone says is a lie. If that were the case, this whole thing would be easy. Finding out which parts are true, and which parts are misrepresentations is the difficult part. It is not straight forward, and there is no simple formula you can follow to find all the fuckery. Each step must be tread carefully.
Beliefs are the Key!
Beliefs are the fraud. If you "believe" you lose the ability to see evidence of the contrary to your beliefs. Allowing yourself to look at all evidence in earnest is the Key. Believing you already know the truth prevents you from using that key.
Hope I didn’t offend anyone
Speaking your truth is never offensive. Not listening to others when they do it is.
Why have we never been to the moon again?
Because our world is micromanaged by the PTB. For whatever reason, they didn't want us to go back. It is even possible some of the footage from the moon landing was faked because of what was really found there. I'm not saying I think that is true, but it's possible and it does have some (small) evidential support.
If we are on a spinning globe. Why are there no pictures from space from under the earth (looking from below up to earth?
Which side is "under"? What does it mean to be "below the Earth"?
Which side is the "bottom" of a ball? How does that question make any sense to you?
If you mean pictures from the south pole, any picture of the South Pole from "above" is a picture of the Earth from "Below". Though from the perspective of America, any picture of Australia (or more likely, somewhere in the Indian Ocean) would be "below". As for fuckery of pictures of the South Pole, there is substantial evidence that there is a whole bunch of hidden shit there, so maybe that is why there are insufficient pictures of "below" to suit your needs.
It is also more difficult to get into a high orbit (hundreds of thousands of miles away) over the North/South poles because of the rotation of the Earth, the Earth's plane of orbit around the Sun (as well as all the other planets) and how we launch, so maybe that is what you mean? We would never launch something super high above a pole, because that is not a direction to anywhere interesting in our solar system, and there are no stable orbits there.
Just have an open mind.
I have a very open mind. I have looked at the evidence of flat earth and all of it does not match with experiment. I have looked at the most recent promoter of Flat Earth (Eric Dubay) and he is almost certainly a CIA operative, purposefully putting out disinformation to discredit those that "have an open mind."
yes they are also knowledgeable about the body
Doctors in my experience know jack shit about cellular and molecular biology (there are certianly some exceptions to that statement), which is what "medicine" is (vernacular). They get all of their information from pharma. They are taught enough to read pharma papers. That's the extent of their knowledge about biology. Do they know anatomy? Sure. Do they know how to take body parts off? Sure. Do they understand the nitty gritty of the human body? Not even in the slightest. They are fucking morons (again, in general, not specifically). Doctors know jack and shit and jack left town.
I do not blame them. I know what they are taught in medical school (and premed) and it is not what they need to know how to heal, but what they need to know to keep people dependent on the system.
So is the earth a ball floating in outer space spinning ridiculously fast?
All evidence suggests the answer to this is yes. I have looked quite a bit into this, and not one shred of evidence that says otherwise stands up to debate. Not one.
Now that doesn't mean I really know what it means to say "we are on a ball floating in "outer space" spinning (not really all that fast)." That last seems to be a misconception. There is a force due to spin (centrifugal) that pulls us outward. That force goes as v^2/R, where v = 1000mph = 447m/s and R = 6370 km = 6370000m.
Therefore v*2/R = 447^2/6,370,000 = 0.03m/s^2. Gravity = 9.81m/s^2 which rounds off to 9.8m/s^2
The "loss" of gravity due to spinning (at the equator, where it is highest) is 0.03 = 9.77m/s^2 which rounds off to 9.8m/s^2.
Going between the poles and the equator (the two extremes) you don't notice a thing.
Ask questions, don’t discount your intuition.
There is a difference between discounting your intuition, and believing it is telling you the truth (i.e. relying on it at the expense of the evidence).
Do we need vaccines to survive and be safe.. clearly not.
This is a false equivalence and a primary trap of The Matrix. It is exactly how a CIA operative can put out information about "Flat Earth" and capture (and discredit) those that are willing to question the narrative. Just because one things someone says is a lie, doesn't mean *all" things someone says is a lie. If that were the case, this whole thing would be easy. Finding out which parts are true, and which parts are misrepresentations is the difficult part. It is not straight forward, and there is no simple formula you can follow to find all the fuckery. Each step must be tread carefully.
Beliefs are the Key!
Beliefs are the fraud. If you "believe" you lose the ability to see evidence of the contrary to your beliefs. Allowing yourself to look at all evidence in earnest is the Key. Believing you already know the truth prevents you from using that key.
Hope I didn’t offend anyone
Speaking your truth is never offensive. Not listening to others when they do it is.
Why have we never been to the moon again?
Because our world is micromanaged by the PTB. For whatever reason, they didn't want us to go back. It is even possible some of the footage from the moon landing was faked because of what was really found there. I'm not saying I think that is true, but it's possible and it does have some (small) evidential support.
If we are on a spinning globe. Why are there no pictures from space from under the earth (looking from below up to earth?
Which side is "under"? What does it mean to be "below the Earth"?
Which side is the "bottom" of a ball? How does that question make any sense to you?
If you mean pictures from the south pole, any picture of the South Pole from "above" is a picture of the Earth from "Below". Though from the perspective of America, any picture of Australia (or more likely, somewhere in the Indian Ocean) would be "below". As for fuckery of pictures of the South Pole, there is substantial evidence that there is a whole bunch of hidden shit there, so maybe that is why there are insufficient pictures of "below" to suit your needs.
It is also more difficult to get into a high orbit (hundreds of thousands of miles away) over the North/South poles because of the rotation of the Earth, the Earth's plane of orbit around the Sun (as well as all the other planets) and how we launch, so maybe that is what you mean? We would never launch something super high above a pole, because that is not a direction to anywhere interesting in our solar system, and there are no stable orbits there.
Just have an open mind.
I have a very open mind. I have looked at the evidence of flat earth and all of it does not match with experiment. I have looked at the most recent promoter of Flat Earth (Eric Dubay) and he is almost certainly a CIA operative, purposefully putting out disinformation to discredit those that "have an open mind."
yes they are also knowledgeable about the body
Doctors in my experience know jack shit about cellular and molecular biology (there are certianly some exceptions to that statement), which is what "medicine" is (vernacular). They get all of their information from pharma. They are taught enough to read pharma papers. That's the extent of their knowledge about biology. Do they know anatomy? Sure. Do they know how to take body parts off? Sure. Do they understand the nitty gritty of the human body? Not even in the slightest. They are fucking morons (again, in general, not specifically). Doctors know jack and shit and jack left town.
I do not blame them. I know what they are taught in medical school and it is not what they need to know to heal, but what they need to know to keep people dependent on the system.
So is the earth a ball floating in outer space spinning ridiculously fast?
All evidence suggests the answer to this is yes. I have looked quite a bit into this, and not one shred of evidence that says otherwise stands up to debate. Not one.
Now that doesn't mean I really know what it means to say "we are on a ball floating in "outer space" spinning (not really all that fast)." That last seems to be a misconception. There is a force due to spin (centrifugal) that pulls us outward. That force goes as v^2/R, where v = 1000mph = 447m/s and R = 6370 km = 6370000m.
Therefore v*2/R = 447^2/6,370,000 = 0.03m/s^2. Gravity = 9.81m/s^2 which rounds off to 9.8m/s^2
The "loss" of gravity due to spinning (at the equator, where it is highest) is 0.03 = 9.77m/s^2 which rounds off to 9.8m/s^2.
Going between the poles and the equator (the two extremes) you don't notice a thing.
Ask questions, don’t discount your intuition.
There is a difference between discounting your intuition, and believing it is telling you the truth (i.e. relying on it at the expense of the evidence).
Do we need vaccines to survive and be safe.. clearly not.
This is a false equivalence and a primary trap of The Matrix. It is exactly how a CIA operative can put out information about "Flat Earth" and capture (and discredit) those that are willing to question the narrative. Just because one things someone says is a lie, doesn't mean *all" things someone says is a lie. If that were the case, this whole thing would be easy. Finding out which parts are true, and which parts are misrepresentations is the difficult part. It is not straight forward, and there is no simple formula you can follow to find all the fuckery. Each step must be tread carefully.
Beliefs are the Key!
Beliefs are the fraud. If you "believe" you lose the ability to see evidence of the contrary to your beliefs. Allowing yourself to look at all evidence in earnest is the Key. Believing you already know the truth prevents you from using that key.
Hope I didn’t offend anyone
Speaking your truth is never offensive. Not listening to others when they do it is.