I am just going to throw this out there for consideration. When stories start hitting MSM after years of suppression, I have to ask myself the question, why now? Why are stories coming out lately about the corruption of Federal law enforcement when it has been there for years? Who gains by publicly casting doubt on the credibility of law enforcement? Is all this water being muddied to bring reasonable doubt upon current or future investigations? Is this an angle? If so, then the merits of a cause of action are obfuscated in legal technicality and the public hype surrounding the veracity of a particular investigation(s). Is this then a well planned escape hatch?

I am simply curious if anyone else is thinking along these lines or is it just overactive cynicism.

I am just going to throw this out there for consideration. When stories start hitting MSM after years of suppression, I have to ask myself the question, why now? Why are stories coming out lately about the corruption of Federal law enforcement when it has been there for years? Who gains by publicly casting doubt on the credibility of law enforcement? Is all this water being muddied to bring reasonable doubt upon current or future investigations? Is this an angle? If so, then the merits of a cause of action are obfuscated in legal technicality and the public hype surrounding the veracity of a particular investigation. Is this ten a well planned escape hatch?

I am simply curious if anyone else is thinking along these lines or is it just overactive cynicism.

I am just going to throw this out there for consideration. When stories start hitting MSM after years of suppression, I have to ask myself the question, why now? Why are stories coming out lately about the corruption of Federal law enforcement when it has been there for years? Who gains by publicly casting doubt on the credibility of law enforcement? Is all this water being muddied to bring reasonable doubt upon current or future investigations? Is this an angle? If so, then the real merits of a cause of action are obfuscated in legal technicality and the public hype surrounding the veracity of a particular investigation. I am simply curious if anyone else is thinking along these lines or is it just overactive cynicism.