Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

there is no secure anything

All you can ever do is hedge against it. This is why centralization requirements are inherently anti-humanitarian. Your data required to be online inherently puts you at risk and kills your privacy - no matter how secure it’s purported to be.

my job had to leave php for SMIME

Bare with me. I am in mobile. We had to abandon PGP because of these flaws. SMIME is a Use Case where a key also requires a typical full stack OpenSSL based certificate exchange. It’s basically the same concepts for SSL websites applied to email. Each email address has an SSL that gets formally signed and keyed. It’s a bit better and can be better managed within an organization. Again the problem with these is key exchange. This inherent security issue ( key exchange ) is going to grow and grow because lamen people have no concept of it.

So from the article and Q post, it is suggested that either this "flaw" was not "publicly" known which indicates that it was well known privately and some SOB's actually had the ability to access to decrypted messages and emails. Imagine that you can effectively unmask people completely through the private tech sector where there is hardly any government oversight?

Yes. I can walk you through how flaws like this are _intentionally introduced into code by Intel Agencies. Example is the Heartbleed OpenSSL exploit.

Now all of that may bake your noodle, BUT think about how Starlink via SpaceX plays right into this. SpaceX, which has many government contracts, can be contracted during this time to provide internet access to the government.

You are at the gates of the Big Picture. It’s also involving Space Force ( which is why Podesta etc are trying so hard to create an agency to oppose Space Force under the guise of UFOs being Unidentified Aerial Threats ). Networks work in segments. The idea is that a orbital network can and will be a guard / hedge. Space Force is a way to build out new networks and entrench. StarLink is the same. The guise here is that there are Space Treaties that forbid militarization - that’s why a private company can get away with things a government can’t in regards to space.

Part of me thinks THIS is the actual reason for TruthSocial, TMTG+, Rumble, etc. in the short term. Long term is to combat the fake news and 'woke' media.

Again - Think Bigger. Gone are the days of the Free and Open Internet ( RE: John Perry Barlow ). The next model is already here and it’s a series of “Cloud Networks” that operate nested within other networks or not and can peer. The concept is called Federation. This ties into the coming Global BioMedical Control Grid. They want you to have an internet entry point they can require a Federal ID on. StarLink etc possibly will give you use and access outside of that.

@OP you have your head on right.

Watch https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/the-secrets-of-silicon-valley-what-big:8 and then DM me.

I would like to continue discussion - some may not need to be here.

Basically if you want to be private - learn your shit.

Also - remember that once you are identified they can pair metadata from past use. What I mean is that say you post on 8kun “Anonymously”. If they can pair up your post through linguistics or anything else - they can match that up against anything you have ever done on the internet with increasing accuracy - reaching back through time. That’s why it’s all archived. That’s why the EU is pushing to do the same.

We are on borrowed time. Make use of it.

https://rambox.app

EDIT:

Part of me thinks THIS is the actual reason for TruthSocial, TMTG+, Rumble, etc. in the short term. Long term is to combat the fake news and 'woke' media.

Remember - Truth Social also just fell back to using the Content Delivery Network of Rumble ( Rumble Cloud ) was the name being thrown around.

If that doesn’t back your point - nothing does.

2 years ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

there is no secure anything

All you can ever do is hedge against it. This is why centralization requirements are inherently anti-humanitarian. Your data required to be online inherently puts you at risk and kills your privacy - no matter how secure it’s purported to be.

my job had to leave php for SMIME

Bare with me. I am in mobile. We had to abandon PGP because of these flaws. SMIME is a Use Case where a key also requires a typical full stack OpenSSL based certificate exchange. It’s basically the same concepts for SSL websites applied to email. Each email address has an SSL that gets formally signed and keyed. It’s a bit better and can be better managed within an organization. Again the problem with these is key exchange. This inherent security issue ( key exchange ) is going to grow and grow because lamen people have no concept of it.

So from the article and Q post, it is suggested that either this "flaw" was not "publicly" known which indicates that it was well known privately and some SOB's actually had the ability to access to decrypted messages and emails. Imagine that you can effectively unmask people completely through the private tech sector where there is hardly any government oversight?

Yes. I can walk you through how flaws like this are _intentionally introduced into code by Intel Agencies. Example is the Heartbleed OpenSSL exploit.

Now all of that may bake your noodle, BUT think about how Starlink via SpaceX plays right into this. SpaceX, which has many government contracts, can be contracted during this time to provide internet access to the government.

You are at the gates of the Big Picture. It’s also involving Space Force ( which is why Podesta etc are trying so hard to create an agency to oppose Space Force under the guise of UFOs being Unidentified Aerial Threats ). Networks work in segments. The idea is that a orbital network can and will be a guard / hedge. Space Force is a way to build out new networks and entrench. StarLink is the same. The guise here is that there are Space Treaties that forbid militarization - that’s why a private company can get away with things a government can’t in regards to space.

Part of me thinks THIS is the actual reason for TruthSocial, TMTG+, Rumble, etc. in the short term. Long term is to combat the fake news and 'woke' media.

Again - Think Bigger. Gone are the days of the Free and Open Internet ( RE: John Perry Barlow ). The next model is already here and it’s a series of “Cloud Networks” that operate nested within other networks or not and can peer. The concept is called Federation. This ties into the coming Global BioMedical Control Grid. They want you to have an internet entry point they can require a Federal ID on. StarLink etc possibly will give you use and access outside of that.

@OP you have your head on right.

Watch https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/the-secrets-of-silicon-valley-what-big:8 and then DM me.

I would like to continue discussion - some may not need to be here.

Basically if you want to be private - learn your shit.

Also - remember that once you are identified they can pair metadata from past use. What I mean is that say you post on 8kun “Anonymously”. If they can pair up your post through linguistics or anything else - they can match that up against anything you have ever done on the internet with increasing accuracy - reaching back through time. That’s why it’s all archived. That’s why the EU is pushing to do the same.

We are on borrowed time. Make use of it.

rambox.app

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

there is no secure anything

All you can ever do is hedge against it. This is why centralization requirements are inherently anti-humanitarian. Your data required to be online inherently puts you at risk and kills your privacy - no matter how secure it’s purported to be.

my job had to leave php for SMIME

Bare with me. I am in mobile. We had to abandon PGP because of these flaws. SMIME is a Use Case where a key also requires a typical full stack OpenSSL based certificate exchange. It’s basically the same concepts for SSL websites applied to email. Each email address has an SSL that gets formally signed and keyed. It’s a bit better and can be better managed within an organization. Again the problem with these is key exchange. This inherent security issue ( key exchange ) is going to grow and grow because lamen people have no concept of it.

So from the article and Q post, it is suggested that either this "flaw" was not "publicly" known which indicates that it was well known privately and some SOB's actually had the ability to access to decrypted messages and emails. Imagine that you can effectively unmask people completely through the private tech sector where there is hardly any government oversight?

Yes. I can walk you through how flaws like this are _intentionally introduced into code by Intel Agencies. Example is the Heartbleed OpenSSL exploit.

Now all of that may bake your noodle, BUT think about how Starlink via SpaceX plays right into this. SpaceX, which has many government contracts, can be contracted during this time to provide internet access to the government.

You are at the gates of the Big Picture. It’s also involving Space Force ( which is why Podesta etc are trying so hard to create an agency to oppose Space Force under the guise of UFOs being Unidentified Aerial Threats ). Networks work in segments. The idea is that a orbital network can and will be a guard / hedge. Space Force is a way to build out new networks and entrench. StarLink is the same. The guise here is that there are Space Treaties that forbid militarization - that’s why a private company can get away with things a government can’t in regards to space.

Part of me thinks THIS is the actual reason for TruthSocial, TMTG+, Rumble, etc. in the short term. Long term is to combat the fake news and 'woke' media.

Again - Think Bigger. Gone are the days of the Free and Open Internet ( RE: John Perry Barlow ). The next model is already here and it’s a series of “Cloud Networks” that operate nested within other networks or not and can peer. The concept is called Federation. This ties into the coming Global BioMedical Control Grid. They want you to have an internet entry point they can require a Federal ID on. StarLink etc possibly will give you use and access outside of that.

@OP you have your head on right.

Watch https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/the-secrets-of-silicon-valley-what-big:8 and then DM me.

I would like to continue discussion - some may not need to be here.

Basically if you want to be private - learn your shit.

Also - remember that once you are identified they can pair metadata from past use. What I mean is that say you post on 8kun “Anonymously”. If they can pair up your post through linguistics or anything else - they can match that up against anything you have ever done on the internet with increasing accuracy - reaching back through time. That’s why it’s all archived. That’s why the EU is pushing to do the same.

We are on borrowed time. Make use of it.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

there is no secure mode

my job had to leave php for SMIMe

So from the article and Q post, it is suggested that either this "flaw" was not "publicly" known which indicates that it was well known privately and some SOB's actually had the ability to access to decrypted messages and emails. Imagine that you can effectively unmask people completely through the private tech sector where there is hardly any government oversight?

Yes. I can walk you through how flaws like this are _intentionally introduced into code by Intel Agencies. Example is the Heartbleed OpenSSL exploit.

Now all of that may bake your noodle, BUT think about how Starlink via SpaceX plays right into this. SpaceX, which has many government contracts, can be contracted during this time to provide internet access to the government.

You are at the gates of the Big Picture. It’s also involving Space Force ( which is why Podesta etc are trying so hard to create an agency to oppose Space Force under the guise of UFOs being Unidentified Aerial Threats ). Networks work in segments. The idea is that a orbital network can and will be a guard / hedge. Space Force is a way to build out new networks and entrench. StarLink is the same. The guise here is that there are Space Treaties that forbid militarization - that’s why a private company can get away with things a government can’t in regards to space.

Part of me thinks THIS is the actual reason for TruthSocial, TMTG+, Rumble, etc. in the short term. Long term is to combat the fake news and 'woke' media.

Again - Think Bigger. Gone are the days of the Free and Open Internet ( RE: John Perry Barlow ). The next model is already here and it’s a series of “Cloud Networks” that operate nested within other networks or not and can peer. The concept is called Federation. This ties into the coming Global BioMedical Control Grid. They want you to have an internet entry point they can require a Federal ID on. StarLink etc possibly will give you use and access outside of that.

@OP you have your head on right.

Watch https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/the-secrets-of-silicon-valley-what-big:8 and then DM me.

I would like to continue discussion - some may not need to be here.

2 years ago
1 score