No, you clearly were. I pointed out he referred to himself as a socialist and any objective person would call him a socialist. You took umbrage to that and pretended that ‘my’ definition of socialism is somehow different from your own ‘correct’ interpretation. So you tried to defend him without knowing what you’re talking about.

No, clearly were. I pointed out he referred to himself as a socialist and any objective person would call him a socialist. You took umbrage to that and pretended that ‘my’ definition of socialism is somehow different from your own ‘correct’ interpretation. So you tried to defend him without knowing what you’re talking about.