I missed where you explained this the first time.

Um, yeah. Oops. Statement used for rhetorical effect. These same arguments have been discussed in other threads, a few times.

I'm using a false what?

Yep. Sorry. Editing mistake. Originally: "using a false logic".

Do you really not think that it's even a little hypocritical to mock others for their need of a "safe space" while commenting on a board that goes to great lengths to provide a "safe space"?

Hmmm... I'm not really a big fan of mocking others. Especially, a lot of cultural marxist dupes who have succumbed to a lying agenda. It's sad, imo. But some like to heap scorn and mockery. In the case of hypocrisy, I think mockery is fine, tho.

But to your question, I personally think there is a huge difference between the so called "safe space" - a creation of the cultural marxists keen to restrict the voice of others in public spaces - and a forum or venue with as specific purpose for discussion.

In these cases, both purpose and motivation are key factors. And, I would highlight again my primary assertion/response to you: understanding what purpose is and what role it plays in things is a critical key capacity for any mature or honest mind.

The same could be said for motivation.

There is a massive difference between a man who knocks out a home intruder weilding a knife who is potentially or actually threatening his family, and a man who knocks out a home protector weilding a knife to defend himself or his family against an intruder.

The action (which is the external expression of an invisible and internal motive) is the same: knocking out a man with a knife, using force. The motivation, and purpose, is completely different, if not opposite.

The so called "safe spaces' were created in public areas, like Universities, etc., in order to provide a place where certain ideas could not be challenged, but the motive and purpose has been to destroy any objections to marxist and culturally martist social justice agendas and ideology. Ostensibly to protect the FEELINGS of the 'victims' of evil patriarchy, or evil Christian 'bigots', whose words are (apparently) violence. But the real and ultimate purpose is to destroy any opposition to the overall Agenda, which is ultimately to destroy the family, breakdown Christian values and freedoms which those values protected and ushered in.

This room is a 'safe space'. >> Now, this whole campus is a 'safe space'. >> Now, this whole corporation is a 'safe space'. >> We must make sure that all of society is a 'safe space'.

To those who pay attention not just to external form, or action, but to motive, purpose and intent, the problems with this are as clear as a bell.

In the case of GAW, the purpose of this forum is to provide a space where the pro-Q content can be discussed and developed, where others who wish to learn about these things can come, in a productive, constructive environment.

You are asserting that both motives are the same, and therefor hypocritical. But that is a morally relativistic view, that fails to take into account motive, purpose and direction of action.

The pro-Q movement has the purpose and intent of securing freedom for all people by exposing corruption and lies. The LGBTQI movement has the (actual) purpose (being driven by those activists and ideologues who infiltrate those communities and movements, by the way) of destroying Christian civilization, destroying the natural family, and ultimately enslaving all people to a tyrannical system where all are victims and all society is continually divided and divided and divided based on ever increasing hierarchies of victimhood.

If there are people in this thread who consider GAW a "safe space" then personally, I would say they too are getting caught up in the moral relativism culture and don't really understand the issues clearly.

But it sounds to me like a) you think that LGBTQI 'need' 'safe spaces' (do you, or not?) and b) you think that defining a purpose for a venue inherently means it must therefore be a 'safe space', and c) that you are fundamentally ignoring what the 'safe spaces' are, their purpose, intent and origin.

For increased understanding on these issues, I strongly recommend viewing this:

The architects of Western Decline

https://rumble.com/vhlbrt-the-roots-of-cultural-marxism-the-architects-of-western-decline.html

It discusses and reveals the origins of the cultural marxist roots of the many aspects or branches of this movement that we see today: 'social justice', Critical Race Theory, the militant LGBTQP movement, political correctness, radical feminism, etc.

If you think that the Q movement and these movements are in fact morally equivalent, then I think you are really in the wrong place. Or maybe the right one.

Have a great day.

I missed where you explained this the first time.

Um, yeah. Oops. Statement used for rhetorical effect. These same arguments have been discussed in other threads, a few times.

I'm using a false what?

Yep. Sorry. Editing mistake. Originally: "using a false logic".

Do you really not think that it's even a little hypocritical to mock others for their need of a "safe space" while commenting on a board that goes to great lengths to provide a "safe space"?

Hmmm... I'm not really a big fan of mocking others. Especially, a lot of cultural marxist dupes who have succumbed to a lying agenda. It's sad, imo. But some like to heap scorn and mockery. In the case of hypocrisy, I think mockery is fine, tho.

But to your question, I personally think there is a huge difference between the so called "safe space" - a creation of the cultural marxists keen to restrict the voice of others in public spaces - and a forum or venue with as specific purpose for discussion.

In these cases, both purpose and motivation are key factors. And, I would highlight again my primary assertion/response to you: understanding what purpose is and what role it plays in things is a critical key capacity for any mature or honest mind.

The same could be said for motivation.

There is a massive difference between a man who knocks out a home intruder weilding a knife who is potentially or actually threatening his family, and a man who knocks out a home protector weilding a knife to defend himself or his family against an intruder.

The action (which is the external expression of an invisible and internal motive) is the same: knocking out a man with a knife, using force. The motivation, and purpose, is completely different, if not opposite.

The so called "safe spaces' were created in public areas, like Universities, etc., in order to provide a place where certain ideas could not be challenged, but the motive and purpose has been to destroy any objections to marxist and culturally martist social justice agendas and ideology. Ostensibly to protect the FEELINGS of the 'victims' of evil patriarchy, or evil Christian 'bigots', whose words are (apparently) violence. But the real and ultimate purpose is to destroy any opposition to the overall Agenda, which is ultimately to destroy the family, breakdown Christian values and freedoms which those values protected and ushered in.

This room is a 'safe space'. >> Now, this whole campus is a 'safe space'. >> Now, this whole corporation is a 'safe space'. >> We must make sure that all of society is a 'safe space'.

To those who pay attention not just to external form, or action, but to motive, purpose and intent, the problems with this are as clear as a bell.

In the case of GAW, the purpose of this forum is to provide a space where the pro-Q content can be discussed and developed, where others who wish to learn about these things can come, in a productive, constructive environment.

You are asserting that both motives are the same, and therefor hypocritical. But that is a morally relativistic view, that fails to take into account motive, purpose and direction of action.

The pro-Q movement has the purpose and intent of securing freedom for all people by exposing corruption and lies. The LGBTQI movement has the (actual) purpose (being driven by those activists and ideologues who infiltrate those communities and movements, by the way) of destroying Christian civilization, destroying the natural family, and ultimately enslaving all people to a tyrannical system where all are victims and all society is continually divided and divided and divided based on ever increasing hierarchies of victimhood.

If there are people in this thread who consider GAW a "safe space" then personally, I would say they too are getting caught up in the moral relativism culture and don't really understand the issues clearly.

It sounds to me like you think a) that LGBTQI 'need' 'safe spaces' (do you, or not?) and b) that defining a purpose for a venue means it must therefore be a 'safe space', and c) that you are fundamentally ignoring what the 'safe spaces' are, their purpose, intent and origin.

For increased understanding on these issues, I strongly recommend viewing this:

The architects of Western Decline

https://rumble.com/vhlbrt-the-roots-of-cultural-marxism-the-architects-of-western-decline.html

It discusses and reveals the origins of the cultural marxist roots of the many aspects or branches of this movement that we see today: 'social justice', Critical Race Theory, the militant LGBTQP movement, political correctness, radical feminism, etc.

If you think that the Q movement and these movements are in fact morally equivalent, then I think you are really in the wrong place. Or maybe the right one.

Have a great day.

I missed where you explained this the first time.

Um, yeah. Oops. Statement used for rhetorical effect. These same arguments have been discussed in other threads, a few times.

I'm using a false what?

Yep. Sorry. Editing mistake. Originally: "using a false logic".

Do you really not think that it's even a little hypocritical to mock others for their need of a "safe space" while commenting on a board that goes to great lengths to provide a "safe space"?

Hmmm... I'm not really a big fan of mocking others. Especially, a lot of cultural marxist dupes who have succumbed to a lying agenda. It's sad, imo. But some like to heap scorn and mockery. In the case of hypocrisy, I think mockery is fine, tho.

But to your question, I personally think there is a huge difference between the so called "safe space" - a creation of the cultural marxists keen to restrict the voice of others in public spaces - and a forum or venue with as specific purpose for discussion.

In these cases, both purpose and motivation are key factors. And, I would highlight again my primary assertion/response to you: understanding what purpose is and what role it plays in things is a critical key capacity for any mature or honest mind.

The same could be said for motivation.

There is a massive difference between a man who knocks out a home intruder weilding a knife who is potentially or actually threatening his family, and a man who knocks out a home protector weilding a knife to defend himself or his family against an intruder.

The action (which is the external expression of an invisible and internal motive) is the same: knocking out a man with a knife, using force. The motivation, and purpose, is completely different, if not opposite.

The so called "safe spaces' were created in public areas, like Universities, etc., in order to provide a place where certain ideas could not be challenged, but the motive and purpose has been to destroy any objections to marxist and culturally martist social justice agendas and ideology. Ostensibly to protect the FEELINGS of the 'victims' of evil patriarchy, or evil Christian 'bigots', whose words are (apparently) violence. But the real and ultimate purpose is to destroy any opposition to the overall Agenda, which is ultimately to destroy the family, breakdown Christian values and freedoms which those values protected and ushered in.

This room is a 'safe space'. Now, this whole campus is a 'safe space'. Now, this who corporation is a 'safe space'. We must make sure that all of society is a 'safe space'.

To those who pay attention not just to external form, or action, but to motive, purpose and intent, the problems with this are as clear as a bell.

In the case of GAW, the purpose of this forum is to provide a space where the pro-Q content can be discussed and developed, where others who wish to learn about these things can come, in a productive, constructive environment.

You are asserting that both motives are the same, and therefor hypocritical. But that is a morally relativistic view, that fails to take into account motive, purpose and direction of action.

The pro-Q movement has the purpose and intent of securing freedom for all people by exposing corruption and lies. The LGBTQI movement has the (actual) purpose (being driven by those activists and ideologues who infiltrate those communities and movements, by the way) of destroying Christian civilization, destroying the natural family, and ultimately enslaving all people to a tyrannical system where all are victims and all society is continually divided and divided and divided based on ever increasing hierarchies of victimhood.

If there are people in this thread who consider GAW a "safe space" then personally, I would say they too are getting caught up in the moral relativism culture and don't really understand the issues clearly.

It sounds to me like you think a) that LGBTQI 'need' 'safe spaces' (do you, or not?) and b) that defining a purpose for a venue means it must therefore be a 'safe space', and c) that you are fundamentally ignoring what the 'safe spaces' are, their purpose, intent and origin.

For increased understanding on these issues, I strongly recommend viewing this:

The architects of Western Decline

https://rumble.com/vhlbrt-the-roots-of-cultural-marxism-the-architects-of-western-decline.html

It discusses and reveals the origins of the cultural marxist roots of the many aspects or branches of this movement that we see today: 'social justice', Critical Race Theory, the militant LGBTQP movement, political correctness, radical feminism, etc.

If you think that the Q movement and these movements are in fact morally equivalent, then I think you are really in the wrong place. Or maybe the right one.

Have a great day.

I missed where you explained this the first time.

Um, yeah. Oops. Statement used for rhetorical effect. These same arguments have been discussed in other threads, a few times.

I'm using a false what?

Yep. Sorry. Editing mistake. Originally: "using a false logic".

Do you really not think that it's even a little hypocritical to mock others for their need of a "safe space" while commenting on a board that goes to great lengths to provide a "safe space"?

Hmmm... I'm not really a big fan of mocking others. Especially, a lot of cultural marxist dupes who have succumbed to a lying agenda. It's sad, imo. But some like to heap scorn and mockery. In the case of hypocrisy, I think mockery is fine, tho.

But to your question, I personally think there is a huge difference between the so called "safe space" - a creation of the cultural marxists keen to restrict the voice of others in public spaces - and a forum or venue with as specific purpose for discussion.

In these cases, both purpose and motivation are key factors. And, I would highlight again my primary assertion/response to you: understanding what purpose is and what role it plays in things is a critical key capacity for any mature or honest mind.

The same could be said for motivation.

There is a massive difference between a man who knocks out a home intruder weilding a knife who is potentially or actually threatening his family, and a man who knocks out a home protector weilding a knife to defend himself or his family against an intruder.

The action (which is the external expression of an invisible and internal motive) is the same: knocking out a man with a knife, using force. The motivation, and purpose, is completely different, if not opposite.

The so called "safe spaces' were created in public areas, like Universities, etc., in order to provide a place where certain ideas could not be challenged, but the motive and purpose has been to destroy any objections to marxist and culturally martist social justice agendas and ideology. Ostensibly to protect the FEELINGS of the 'victims' of evil patriarchy, or evil Christian 'bigots', whose words are (apparently) violence. But the real and ultimate purpose is to destroy any opposition to the overall Agenda, which is ultimately to destroy the family, breakdown Christian values and freedoms which those values protected and ushered in.

The purpose of this forum is to provide a space where the pro-Q content can be discussed and developed, where others who wish to learn about these things can come, in a productive, constructive environment.

You are asserting that both motives are the same, and therefor hypocritical. But that is a morally relativistic view, that fails to take into account motive, purpose and direction of action.

The pro-Q movement has the purpose and intent of securing freedom for all people by exposing corruption and lies. The LGBTQI movement has the (actual) purpose (being driven by those activists and ideologues who infiltrate those communities and movements, by the way) of destroying Christian civilization, destroying the natural family, and ultimately enslaving all people to a tyrannical system where all are victims and all society is continually divided and divided and divided based on ever increasing hierarchies of victimhood.

If there are people in this thread who consider GAW a "safe space" then personally, I would say they too are getting caught up in the moral relativism culture and don't really understand the issues clearly.

It sounds to me like you think a) that LGBTQI 'need' 'safe spaces' (do you, or not?) and b) that defining a purpose for a venue means it must therefore be a 'safe space', and c) that you are fundamentally ignoring what the 'safe spaces' are, their purpose, intent and origin.

For increased understanding on these issues, I strongly recommend viewing this:

The architects of Western Decline

https://rumble.com/vhlbrt-the-roots-of-cultural-marxism-the-architects-of-western-decline.html

It discusses and reveals the origins of the cultural marxist roots of the many aspects or branches of this movement that we see today: 'social justice', Critical Race Theory, the militant LGBTQP movement, political correctness, radical feminism, etc.

If you think that the Q movement and these movements are in fact morally equivalent, then I think you are really in the wrong place. Or maybe the right one.

Have a great day.