To interject in this discussion with my 2 cents, the symbols guy does make some rash judgement calls, in my opinion.
In all honesty, I think we were on the moon long, long before the moon landing supposedly took place.
The landing was, therefore, pantomime to establish comms.
With what? It's not so clear. The moon stands for so much in so many cultures, it may well be a declaration that JFK was really looking for a way to land on the subconscious mind (maybe to reverse MK Ultra brainwashing, which we learned how to do from the NAZIs?). I'm not convinced of that, so let's continue to assume they did go to the moon, but under illusory auspices.
The decodingsymbols guy also claims nuclear bombs don't exist either.
I think it's not all that simple.
Like every other symbol comm, for a Mirror to exist, the Real must exist as well, in some capacity. Think of it like a Mountain and a Still Pond. The Pond reflects the mountains, and you can obviously muddy the waters or add waves that distort, but you aren't affecting the Truth, in that the Mountain itself had not been shaken.
So, yes, I think we did land on the moon, but with technology FAR AND AWAY more advanced than they'd like for the public to know about. So, they created a fake moon landing to show the public we did go there, but made us think that strictly 60's era technology was capable of doing so.
What technology did they want to prevent us from knowing about? I'd wager it was Ether/Aether or some other form of propulsion-less craft that would clearly demonstrate the use of free-energy systems, a la Nikola Tesla's resonant frequency devices.
How does that sit with you two?
That true facts are perpetually unclear lends to the secrecy of the comms, and is why AI can never decode them -- it requires discerning human with first-hand knowledge of natural phenomena and relationships.
To interject in this discussion with my 2 cents, the symbols guy does make some rash judgement calls, in my opinion.
In all honesty, I think we were on the moon long, long before the moon landing supposedly took place.
The landing was, therefore, pantomime to establish comms.
With what? It's not so clear. The moon stands for so much in so many cultures, it may well be a declaration that JFK was really looking for a way to land on the subconscious mind (maybe to reverse MK Ultra brainwashing, which we learned how to do from the NAZIs?). I'm not convinced of that, so let's continue to assume they did go to the moon, but under illusory auspices.
The decodingsymbols guy also claims nuclear bombs don't exist either.
I think it's not all that simple.
Like every other symbol comm, for a Mirror to exist, the Real must exist as well, in some capacity. Think of it like a Mountain and a Still Pond. The Pond reflects the mountains, and you can obviously muddy the waters or add waves that distort, but you aren't affecting the Truth, in that the Mountain itself had not been shaken.
So, yes, I think we did land on the moon, but with technology FAR AND AWAY more advanced than they'd like for the public to know about. So, they created a fake moon landing to show the public we did go there, but made us thing that strictly 60's era technology was capable of doing so.
What technology did they want to prevent us from knowing about? I'd wager it was Ether/Aether or some other form of propulsion-less craft that would clearly demonstrate the use of free-energy systems, a la Nikola Tesla's resonant frequency devices.
How does that sit with you two?
That true facts are perpetually unclear lends to the secrecy of the comms, and is why AI can never decode them -- it requires discerning human with first-hand knowledge of natural phenomena and relationships.