Think about 2000 Mules as if you were a juror in a court case.

This GPS cell phone tracking was presented as evidence and where available had surveillance video camera footage to verify the cell phone owner at the drop boxes stuffing the ballots in, at several locations; night after night.

You have whistle-blower mules testify that this is how the system played out.

Then you have the non-profit facilities where the mules picked up the ballots.

You also have the money trail of the mules getting paid by the non-profits.

You also have names of major donors to those non-profits and that money trail.

You also have evidence of which political party those non-profits donated to.

You also have the knowledge that States' election laws were illegally changed to allow the illegal ballot drop boxes.

What would you do? What does your common sense tell you about all this evidence? Is this clear and convincing evidence of a crime?

Think about 2000 Mules as if you were a juror in a court case.

This GPS cell phone tracking was presented as evidence and where available had surveillance video camera footage to verify the cell phone owner at the drop boxes stuffing the ballots in, at several locations; night after night.

You have whistle-blower mules testify that this is how the system played out.

Then you have the non-profit facilities where the mules picked up the ballots.

You also have the money trail of the mules getting paid by the non-profits.

You also have names of major donors to those non-profits.

You also have evidence of which political party those non-profits donated to.

You also have the knowledge that States' election laws were illegally changed to allow the illegal ballot drop boxes.

What would you do? What does your common sense tell you about all this evidence? Is this clear and convincing evidence of a crime?