they used the PCR test to pump up the numbers, but that doesn't mean the contrary is true, that "there is no virus"

These are 2 completey seperate issues:

(1) Is PCR valid as a diagnostic tool?

(2) Is there a virus?

You are falsely stating that these two are somehow necessarily linked. They are not. PCR was just a convenient way to lie about the supposed effects of the non-existent virus.

Many people are still stuck on the idea that if someone gets sick, then it MUST be because of a virus.

THAT is a false idea, and it is because ... YOU DID NOT BOTHER TO STUDY THE SUBJECT.

Believe the TV box if you want, but it lies to you.

KEK

they used the PCR test to pump up the numbers, but that doesn't mean the contrary is true, that "there is no virus"

These are 2 completey seperate issues:

(1) Is PCR valid as a diagnostic tool?

(2) Is there a virus?

You are falsely stating that these two are somehow necessarily linked. They are not. PCR was just a convenient way to lie about the supposed effects of the non-existent virus.

That is not logical, and not true.

Many people are still stuck on the idea that if someone gets sick, then it MUST be because of a virus.

THAT is a false idea, and it is because ... YOU DID NOT BOTHER TO STUDY THE SUBJECT.

Believe the TV box if you want, but it lies to you.

KEK

they used the PCR test to pump up the numbers, but that doesn't mean the contrary is true, that "there is no virus"

These are 2 completey seperate issues:

(1) Is PCR valid as a diagnostic tool?

(2) Is there a virus?

You are falsely stating that these two are somehow necessarily linked. They are not. PCR was just a convenient way to lie about the supposed effects of the non-existend virus.

That is not logical, and not true.

Many people are still stuck on the idea that if someone gets sick, then it MUST be because of a virus.

THAT is a false idea, and it is because ... YOU DID NOT BOTHER TO STUDY THE SUBJECT.

Believe the TV box if you want, but it lies to you.

KEK

they used the PCR test to pump up the numbers, but that doesn't mean the contrary is true, that "there is no virus"

These are 2 complete seperate issues:

(1) Is PCR valid as a diagnostic tool?

(2) Is there a virus?

You are falsely stating that these two are somehow necessarily linked. They are not. PCR was just a convenient way to lie about the supposed effects of the non-existend virus.

That is not logical, and not true.

Many people are still stuck on the idea that if someone gets sick, then it MUST be because of a virus.

THAT is a false idea, and it is because ... YOU DID NOT BOTHER TO STUDY THE SUBJECT.

Believe the TV box if you want, but it lies to you.

KEK