Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

My concern is why doesn't Durham have the same latitude and power as Mueller did? Remember they used the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to raid Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen. This was during Trump's presidency. Stephen Ryan, Cohen's lawyer, said in a statement. "I have been advised by federal prosecutors that the New York action is, in part, a referral by the Office of Special Counsel, Robert Mueller." Ryan called the search "completely inappropriate and unnecessary" and said authorities had seized "protected attorney client communications between a lawyer and his clients." He added that Cohen had previously cooperated with government investigations, including in Congress. McClatchy reported last week that Mueller was looking into Cohen and the Trump Organization. Cohen was involved in overseas business deals, the report said.

Durham is investigating the exact same thing, but as a fraud. Why doesn't Durham have the same latitude as Mueller? The answer is obvious -- Judge Cooper is another biased Judge like Emmitt Sullivan was.

Didn't Cooper just rule they are not privileged? If the judge initially ruled in favor of Durham, why does the judge still need to review the the Fusion GPS documents to determine if they are "privileged? Why are the Fusion GPS subpoenaed documents viewed by 'court camera'? This suggests this Judge is throttling the investigation. They should have been sent to Durham carte blanche for his review.

Having read the Obama-appointed Judge's ruling, it really sounds like Sussman is going to end up not convicted of anything. This Obama appointed judge is biased.

Compare this judge to the judge's for Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone. All of them were Demwit appointed Judge's too.), it really sounds like Sussman is going to end not convicted of anything. This Obama appointed judge is biased. If we draw from the conclusion there was no Alpha Bank - Trump connection, then who fabricated this fraudulent 'evidence? Are we to believe each actor of this fraud didn't know the 'evidence' was fake? This judge is disassembling the RICO case.

Compare this judge to the judge's for Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone. All of them were Demwit appointed Judge's too.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.121.0.pdf

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

My concern is why doesn't Durham have the same latitude and power as Mueller did? Remember they used the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to raid Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen. This was during Trump's presidency. Stephen Ryan, Cohen's lawyer, said in a statement. "I have been advised by federal prosecutors that the New York action is, in part, a referral by the Office of Special Counsel, Robert Mueller." Ryan called the search "completely inappropriate and unnecessary" and said authorities had seized "protected attorney client communications between a lawyer and his clients." He added that Cohen had previously cooperated with government investigations, including in Congress. McClatchy reported last week that Mueller was looking into Cohen and the Trump Organization. Cohen was involved in overseas business deals, the report said.

Durham is investigating the exact same thing, but as a fraud. Why doesn't Durham have the same latitude as Mueller? The answer is obvious -- Judge Cooper is another biased Judge like Emmitt Sullivan was.

Didn't Cooper just rule they are not privileged? If the judge initially ruled in favor of Durham, why does the judge still need to review the the Fusion GPS documents to determine if they are "privileged? Why are the Fusion GPS subpoenaed documents viewed by 'court camera'? This suggests this Judge is throttling the investigation. They should have been sent to Durham carte blanche for his review.

Having read the Obama-appointed Judge's ruling, it really sounds like Sussman is going to end not convicted of anything. This Obama appointed judge is biased. If we draw from the conclusion there was no Alpha Bank - Trump connection, then who fabricated this fraudulent 'evidence? Are we to believe each actor of this fraud didn't know the 'evidence' was fake? This judge is disassembling the RICO case.

Compare this judge to the judge's for Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone. All of them were Demwit appointed Judge's too.), it really sounds like Sussman is going to end not convicted of anything. This Obama appointed judge is biased. If we draw from the conclusion there was no Alpha Bank - Trump connection, then who fabricated this fraudulent 'evidence? Are we to believe each actor of this fraud didn't know the 'evidence' was fake? This judge is disassembling the RICO case.

Compare this judge to the judge's for Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone. All of them were Demwit appointed Judge's too.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.121.0.pdf

2 years ago
1 score