I believe that it's absolutely possible that Donald Trump could lose the 2020 election to Joe Biden without there being election fraud, without a Plan, without Q, without the Cabal, etc.

This is something that I think almost every Q person will contest. Q people don't accept that Trump could lose, and certainly not that he would leave the White House in Biden's hands without some sort of master plan that makes the sacrifice of himself (and his supporters) worth it.

But I absolutely believe that the world we live in could exist without Q. I believe that measuring rally size is a nonsense way of measuring likely voters. Biden didn't need to provide energy for Democratic turnout, because Trump did that.

I also think that Trump supporters made the same mistake that Democrats did (twice) in 2016: they assumed that energy level translated into reality. Bernie Sanders was the most popular person on Reddit, and so it was a shock to see him lose.

Trump supporters did the same thing. They looked at the rallies, the attention on Trump, and then looked at Biden and saw him sitting quietly in the corner. And they assumed the cat was in the bag.

And it wasn't, because Biden never needed supporters. He just needed people to want Trump out of office. That's why a mayonnaise sandwich like Biden was perfect. He offended nobody outside of the conspiracy circles, including the Republicans who were unhappy with Trump (and, again, never would go to a Biden rally).

I think the difference in when mail-in votes were counted, and the political bias in favor of one type of voting or another, makes the majority shifts less suspicious to everyone else than they are to you.

When you believe that it's impossible for Trump to have lost the 2020 election, then yeah, of course the evidence seems obvious. Because how else could this impossible world exist?

In my opinion, that's where Q people tend to struggle the most in the normiesphere. It's one thing to offer an interesting story connecting dots, but that's only half the battle. Defeating the null hypothesis is equally important, and simply dismissing the evidence as fabricated by the Deep State is unlikely to make much progress with people who don't accept the impossibility of Trump's loss.

I believe that it's absolutely possible that Donald Trump could lose the 2020 election to Joe Biden without there being election fraud, without a Plan, without Q, without the Cabal, etc.

This is something that I think almost every Q person will contest. Q people don't accept that Trump could lose, and certainly not that he would leave the White House in Biden's hands without some sort of master plan that makes the sacrifice of himself (and his supporters) worth it.

But I absolutely believe that the world we live in could exist without Q. I believe that measuring rally size is a nonsense way of measuring likely voters. Biden didn't need to provide energy for Democratic turnout, because Trump did that.

I also think that Trump supporters made the same mistake that Democrats did (twice) in 2016: they assumed that energy level translated into reality. Bernie Sanders was the most popular person on Reddit, and so it was a shock to see him lose.

Trump supporters did the same thing. They looked at the rallies, the attention on Trump, and then looked at Biden and saw him sitting quietly in the corner. And they assumed the cat was in the bag.

And it wasn't, because Biden never needed supporters. He just needed people to want Trump out of office. That's why a mayonnaise sandwich like Biden was perfect. He offended nobody outside of the conspiracy circles, including the Republicans who were unhappy with Trump (and, again, never would go to a Biden rally).

I think the difference in when mail-in votes were counted, and the political bias in favor of one type of voting or another, makes the majority shifts less suspicious to everyone else than they are to you.

When you believe that it's impossible for Trump to have lost the 2020 election, then yeah, of course the evidence seems obvious. Because how else could this impossible world exist?

In my opinion, that's where Q people tend to struggle the most in the normiesphere. It's one thing to offer an interesting story connecting of dots, but that's only half the battle. Defeating the null hypothesis is equally important, and simply dismissing the evidence as fabricated by the Deep State is unlikely to make much progress with people who don't accept the impossibility of Trump's loss.

I believe that it's absolutely possible that Donald Trump could lose the 2020 election to Joe Biden without there being election fraud, without a Plan, without Q, without the Cabal, etc.

This is something that I think almost every Q person will contest. Q people don't accept that Trump could lose, and certainly not that he would leave the White House in Biden's hands without some sort of master plan that makes the sacrifice of himself (and his supporters) worth it.

But I absolutely believe that the world we live in could exist without Q. I believe that measuring rally size is a nonsense way of measuring likely voters. Biden didn't need to provide energy for Democratic turnout, because Trump did that.

I also think that Trump supporters made the same mistake that Democrats did (twice) in 2016: they assumed that energy level translated into reality. Bernie Sanders was the most popular person on Reddit, and so it was a shock to see him lose.

Trump supporters did the same thing. They looked at the rallies, the attention on Trump, and then looked at Biden and saw him sitting quietly in the corner. And they assumed the cat was in the bag.

And it wasn't, because Biden never needed supporters. He just needed people to want Trump out of office. That's why a mayonnaise sandwich like Biden was perfect. He offended nobody outside of the conspiracy circles, including the Republicans who were unhappy with Trump (and, again, never would go to a Biden rally).

I think the difference in when mail-in votes were counted, and the political bias in favor of one type of voting or another, makes the majority shifts less suspicious to everyone else than they are to you.

When you believe that it's impossible for Trump to have lost the 2020 election, then yeah, of course the evidence seems obvious. Because how else could this impossible world exist?

In my opinion, that's where Q people tend to struggle the most in the normiesphere. It's one thing to offer an interesting connecting of dots, but that's only half the battle. Defeating the null hypothesis is equally important, and simply dismissing the evidence as fabricated by the Deep State is unlikely to make much progress with people who don't accept the impossibility of Trump's loss.