You state that it is proven that there are less caries in children and adults that use fluoride. Speaking as someone that was involved in medical and dental research for years, I was exposed to those same epidemiological studies in college. Dig deeper. Epidemiological studies are flawed and are not based on true clinical science. They are at their basically nothing more than statistical opinion. This is especially true concerning the whole premise underpinning the systemic use of fluoride in children. Gee, where have we heard safe and effective before? It is a common line used when trying to sell their own brand of snake oil.
From the very beginning, that entire public health policy surrounding fluoride was based on financial interests of commercial oligarchy - namely aluminum manufactures that were faced with the prospect of a huge financial burden to remove their toxic byproducts from the nation's water systems that they had been polluting. FDR created the US Public Health Service, and with the help of his corporate buddies at Alcoa Aluminum and the corrupt AMA, the US was given our current narrative about fluoride. Professional cancel culture was alive and well long before Covid in this arena concerning fluoride for anyone that dared to challenge the narrative. The same attitude holds true for vaxxines - but that is a conversation for another thread.
As far as real clinical science goes, it was stated in the ADA's own journal in either 2000 or 2002 that systemic use of fluoride did nothing to reduce acid solubility of dental structures. This does not even take into account the problems caused by dental fluorosis - and teeth are not the only calcified structures in the body. But yet we continue to poison millions of people by exposing them to fluoride that in actually has no nutritional purpose in human health. However, the ADA also concluded in that same paper that topical use of fluoride did help remineralize enamel. But keep in mind that in order for enamel to mineralize, that process takes approximately 20 to 30 minutes. Which is not long enough considering how most fluoride is used - either by water or toothpastes. Therefore, topical use of fluoride for purposes of remineralization are all but useless. There are safer alternatives to fluoride if topical remineralization is the goal - ACP and MCHA - that do not have the toxic effects associated with fluoride.
The bottom line is that fluoride is a toxic compound and should not be used under any circumstances. The list of its deleterious effects on the human body continue to grow and continue to be ignored. I have been on the front lines of this issue for years and have professionally taken the heat for exposing the ugly truth. I realized in college that it was all BS and tried to challenge the narratives even then. We must research for ourselves and be critical thinkers. What health care professionals claim as proof often is based on circular reasoning birthed from purely financial, and in some cases political, motivations. The American public has been sold a bill of goods on fluoride and professionals tasked with the responsibility of caring for patients continue to propagate the lie.
You state that it is proven that there are less caries in children and adults that use fluoride. Speaking as someone that was involved in medical and dental research for years, I was exposed to those same epidemiological studies in college. Dig deeper. Epidemiological studies are flawed and are not based on true clinical science. They are at their basically nothing more than statistical opinion. This is especially true concerning the whole premise underpinning the systemic use of fluoride in children. Gee, where have we heard safe and effective before? It is a common line used when trying to sell their own brand of snake oil.
From the very beginning, that entire public health policy surrounding fluoride was based on financial interests of commercial oligarchy - namely aluminum manufactures that were faced with the prospect of a huge financial burden to remove their toxic byproducts from the nation's water systems that they had been polluting. FDR created the US Public Health Service, and with the help of his corporate buddies at Alcoa Aluminum and the corrupt AMA, the US was given our current narrative about fluoride. Professional cancel culture was alive and well long before Covid in this arena concerning fluoride for anyone that dared to challenge the narrative. The same attitude holds true for vaxxines - but that is a conversation for another thread.
As far as real clinical science goes, it was stated in the ADA's own journal in either 2000 or 2002 that systemic use of fluoride did nothing to reduce acid solubility of dental structures. This does not even take into account the problems caused by dental fluorosis - and teeth are not the only calcified structures in the body. But yet we continue to poison millions of people by exposing them to fluoride that in actually has no nutritional purpose in human health. However, the ADA also concluded in that same paper that topical use of fluoride did help remineralize enamel. But, there are safer alternatives to fluoride if topical remineralization is the goal - ACP and MCHA.
The bottom line is that fluoride is a toxic compound and should not be used under any circumstances. The list of its deleterious effects on the human body continue to grow and continue to be ignored. I have been on the front lines of this issue for years and have professionally taken the heat for exposing the ugly truth. I realized in college that it was all BS and tried to challenge the narratives even then. We must research for ourselves and be critical thinkers. What health care professionals claim as proof often is based on circular reasoning birthed from purely financial, and in some cases political, motivations. The American public has been sold a bill of goods on fluoride and professionals tasked with the responsibility of caring for patients continue to propagate the lie.
You state that it is proven that there are less caries in children and adults that use fluoride. Speaking as someone that was involved in medical and dental research for years, I was exposed to those same epidemiological studies in college. Dig deeper. Epidemiological studies are flawed and are not based on true clinical science. They are at their basically nothing more than statistical opinion. This is especially true concerning the whole premise underpinning the systemic use of fluoride in children. Gee, where have we heard safe and effective before? It is a common line used when trying to sell their own brand of snake oil.
From the very beginning, that entire public health policy surrounding fluoride was based on financial interests of commercial oligarchy - namely aluminum manufactures that were faced with the prospect of a huge financial burden to remove their toxic byproducts from the nation's water systems that they had been polluting. FDR created the US Public Health Service, and with the help of his corporate buddies at Alcoa Aluminum and the corrupt AMA, the US was given our current narrative about fluoride. Professional cancel culture was alive and well long before Covid in this arena concerning fluoride for anyone that dared to challenge the narrative. The same attitude holds true for vaxxines - but that is a conversation for another thread.
As far as real clinical science goes, it was stated in the ADA's own journal in either 2000 or 2002 that systemic use of fluoride did nothing to reduce acid solubility of dental structures. But yet we continue to poison millions of people by exposing them to fluoride that in actually has no nutritional purpose in human health. However, the ADA also concluded in that same paper that topical use of fluoride did help remineralize enamel. But, there are safer alternatives to fluoride if topical remineralization is the goal - ACP and MCHA.
The bottom line is that fluoride is a toxic compound and should not be used under any circumstances. The list of its deleterious effects on the human body continue to grow and continue to be ignored. I have been on the front lines of this issue for years and have professionally taken the heat for exposing the ugly truth. I realized in college that it was all BS and tried to challenge the narratives even then. We must research for ourselves and be critical thinkers. What health care professionals claim as proof often is based on circular reasoning birthed from purely financial, and in some cases political, motivations. The American public has been sold a bill of goods on fluoride and professionals tasked with the responsibility of caring for patients continue to propagate the lie.