I don’t know if I can ask this without people getting mad, but let me try.

Have any of you research anons who dig into the microscopic details of every situation investigated this one for tomfoolery?

A liberal Q movement might suggest this worked out all too perfectly. Right after a major school shooting with an AR-15, we see another attempted shooting that was unceremoniously stopped by a “good guy with a gun?”

It doesn’t seem like an awfully convenient narrative?

A dude who owns an AR-15 is apparently so bad at shooting it that he can fire into a crowd and not hit anyone? Then be killed by a convenient passerby?

And he was so easy to set off that asking him to slow down for children in the street was enough to make him homicidal?

You’re going to accept the news narrative that easily?

What if the shooter was MKUltra’d by conservative bad guys and made to do this so he could be taken down and set the narrative that AR-15’s aren’t scary and every civilian should be packing heat? What if he was planted there and the woman was expecting him?

Because this was just a movie being played out?

Why isn’t every detail of this case being analyzed by Q people for theater trickery? Why don’t I see the same level of analysis here by Q people making sure that your side isn’t also (or the only ones) pulling dirty tricks and false flags?

You ask why this isn’t in the news. Fair question. Equally fair: why will this thread likely be forgotten by the end of the day here on the boards when there is such a wealth of information here about a potential conservative murder conspiracy behind this story?

I don’t know if I can ask this without people getting mad, but let me try.

Have any of you research anons who dig into the microscopic details of every situation investigated this one for tomfoolery?

A liberal Q movement might suggest this worked out all too perfectly. Right after a major school shooting with an AR-15, we see another attempted shooting that was unceremoniously stopped by a “good guy with a gun?”

It doesn’t seem like an awfully convenient narrative?

A dude who owns an AR-15 is apparently so bad at shooting it that he can fire into a crowd and not hit anyone? Then be killed by a convenient passerby?

And he was so easy to set off that asking him to slow down for children in the street was enough to make him homicidal?

You’re going to accept the news narrative that easily?

What if the shooter was MKUltra’d by conservative bad guys and made to do this so he could be taken down and set the narrative that AR-15’s aren’t scary and every civilian should be packing heat? What if he was planted there and the woman was expecting him?

Because this was just a movie being played out?

Why isn’t every detail of this case being analyzed for Q people for theater trickery? Why don’t I see the same level of analysis here by Q people making sure that your side isn’t also (or the only ones) pulling dirty tricks and false flags?

You ask why this isn’t in the news. Fair question. Equally fair: why will this thread likely be forgotten by the end of the day here on the boards when there is such a wealth of information here about a potential conservative murder conspiracy behind this story?