You're not 'wrong'.

Here's a third position:

Don't take it at face value. Find any truth or falsity in it and relay your findings.

Equally frustrating to 'unsauced claims' is the kneejerk 'skeptic' who wants things laid into his lap but won't actually engage about the subject or subjects in a way to counterclaim or correct, simply negate.

"Not" is not a critique.

Perhaps the OP has a different take on the word 'inter dimensional'.

Is there a 'take' on these words that might make them true. ?

I can say the same words and find truth in them, but I suspect not in the way the OP would. That would have to be discussed more.

The word 'demon' or 'angel' fits this same description to both the literalist and the esoteric who both use the words, yet see them as different 'things'.

Does the cabal believe in such things? Many do and it becomes a huge motive for their deeds.

Perhaps 'both sides' have a problem with over-literalization. This.

One can understand the cabal's system without falling prey to its errors, but one would have to know what the error is. That takes knowing HOW and WHY the truth has been twisted into a corrupt system.

Know thy enemy. Be as wise as serpents. Better yet.....know that the word 'serpent' is an analogy.

Don't ask. Don't doubt. Give the answer, or correction and provide the sauce if you have it. Because to just say 'not' is crossing that same line.......in a negative statement....trying to disprove by negation only.

it's Catch 22.

Only thing missing is the answers.

Don't take it at face value. Find any truth or falsity in it and relay your findings.

Equally frustrating to 'unsauced claims' is the kneejerk 'skeptic' who wants things laid into his lap but won't actually engage about the subject or subjects in a way to counterclaim or correct, simply negate.

"Not" is not a critique.

Perhaps the OP has a different take on the word 'inter dimensional'.

Is there a 'take' on these words that might make them true. ?

I can say the same words and find truth in them, but I suspect not in the way the OP would. That would have to be discussed more.

The word 'demon' or 'angel' fits this same description to both the literalist and the esoteric who both use the words, yet see them as different 'things'.

Does the cabal believe in such things? Many do and it becomes a huge motive for their deeds.

Perhaps 'both sides' have a problem with over-literalization. This.

One can understand the cabal's system without falling prey to its errors, but one would have to know what the error is. That takes knowing HOW and WHY the truth has been twisted into a corrupt system.

Know thy enemy. Be as wise as serpents. Better yet.....know that the word 'serpent' is an analogy.

Don't ask. Don't doubt. Give the answer, or correction and provide the sauce if you have it. Because to just say 'not' is crossing that same line.......in a negative statement....trying to disprove by negation only.

it's Catch 22.

Only thing missing is the answers.