3 June 2022 Red Pill News - Zak Paine Interview Gregg Phillips
@29:25
https://rumble.com/v178cw2-patriot-games-with-gregg-phillips-on-fri.-night-livestream.html
Gregg Phillips:
"They've been doing ballot harvesting for 107 years. There's no real magic to it all, right, other than its just different in different times. Like, in the late 1800's they made them start using glass balls to put their ballots in so they could actually see what they were putting in there and be sure they weren't cheating and doing something untoward. So everybody knows that this is happening and everybody knows these kinds of things go on. But what people don't realize is that this really does make a huge difference.
In places like Alabama a guy named Perry Hooper Sr. was running for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in Alabama in 1994. He happened to be my political mentor, I knew him, I knew his family. We're doing a little mini-movie on this right now. And Judge Hooper was a very important person in my life and God rest his soul he was just a really great man.
But what happened to him was shocking. And America needs to understand this story. Here's what happened to this guy. He goes to bed on election night thinking he had won. First Republican ever elected to the Supreme Court in Alabama, and, as Chief Justice. This is a big deal in Alabama in 1994. He goes to bed thinking he had won by 15,000 votes, when he wakes up all of sudden there are all these... he's behind or a few ahead, and they're counting all these votes that shouldn't be counted. They immediately sued to stop the certification. He wasn't seated until 11 months later when the United States Supreme Court said two important things that are salient to this very day, Zak.
The first thing they said was, whatever the law is, not the rules, whatever the law is on election day, that's what prevails. Right. It doesn't matter if there are these consent decrees, it doesn't matter if somebody doesn't like it, it doesn't matter. Its what the law is that prevails. The Supreme Court was very clear on that.
The second thing they were very clear on was that there is no such thing as 'substantial compliance'. Meaning, "Oh, I meant to sign the back and I forgot" or "I didn't date it, I'm sorry." In Pennsylvania I think they settled it finally but that was what was happening, right, they didn't date these envelopes.
But the Hooper case was extremely clear. In fact, it was in part what helped the lawyers argue Bush v. Gore a few years after that. But now if you go look for Hooper... I mean Hornsby v. Alabama, if you go look for that case you can't find it. They've scrubbed it. Google scrubbed it, everybody scrubbed it. I've got a friend down in Montgomery, Alabama, at ... I'm from Alabama, and I've got a friend at the Supreme Court down there and he's looking around in the archives. They can't even find it.
We have it, but how could it be that something this monumental and this important to the country... and we went through 2020 and I'm probably the first person to ever tell you that that ruling exists, right?"
Zak Paine: "Never heard of it."
Gregg Phillips:
"They stopped the certification. And they said whatever the law is is the law. You don't like it, If you don't like it about the signatures, tough, get enough people and get the law changed. And this whole 'substantial compliance' "I meant to do it right" or "I almost got it right" is nonsense."
@43:00
Gregg Phillips:
"We have access to some extremely sophisticated Artificial Intelligence and if we deploy this in the proper way and people are coming up to box after box after box, as you said, that camera is right there in front of them and we deploy this and we have citizens that when those red lights start flashing saying "This person is known to this system, they've already been here, here's the seven places they've already been" and instantly packages it and we put it into... maybe somebody checks off on it, maybe we have some supervisors or something... then we hand it to the Sheriffs or we hand it to local PD, or hand it to a State PD if we have to. Then, that's what we want to do. Our biggest problem so far is politics and law enforcement."
@46:48
Gregg Phillips:
"We are going to see some really old, established fraud eco systems go down in this instance. Once we get that one in San Luiz and we nail these people, all of them, we know that through the funding sources that these eco systems exist in at least 60 other poor communities across the country and because we know have a much more clear sense of what that actually looks like and feels like we're going to be able to take that model and go to Sheriff, you know, John Doe in XYZ place in Texas and say, "Here's what happened in San Luiz." I think the biggest thing, Zak, for people to understand is... and this was hard for even us to understand because we wanted it all to be about election fraud, and it was. But what's really interesting about this is the election fraud is superfluous to what's actually the real deal. Because they need to get elected because they need to stay in power. Most of these are low level elected officials or supervisors, school boards, that kind of thing. But they need to be able to control all that federal money that's coming in, the food for the kids, and all the federal grants and everything that are coming in. But foundations, both national and international foundations that are pouring money into these communities and it is a flat out grift. I mean, some of these folks are making half a million dollars a year to nothing but sit on a non-profit board. It doesn't even make sense. You start putting all those pieces together and given some of the interviews we've heard. Its not just about sitting on this board or helping people with low income housing. Its about being on that bank board and getting a piece of that juice, its about being in the pocket of the pest control, being in the pocket of the road builders ans the roofers and all the different parts. We actually have testimony from one whistle blower who says this one particular person in San Luiz is into 27 different sources of income.
Zak Paine: "Is that the one who left the country?"
Gregg Phillips: "Could be." (Smiles) "Could be."
Zak Paine:
"You know you're doing it right when somebody runs and flees from the country so they can avoid prosecution."
3 June 2022 Red Pill News - Zak Paine Interview Gregg Phillips
@29:25
https://rumble.com/v178cw2-patriot-games-with-gregg-phillips-on-fri.-night-livestream.html
Gregg Phillips:
"They've been doing ballot harvesting for 107 years. There's no real magic to it all, right, other than its just different in different times. Like, in the late 1800's they made them start using glass balls to put their ballots in so they could actually see what they were putting in there and be sure they weren't cheating and doing something untoward. So everybody knows that this is happening and everybody knows these kinds of things go on. But what people don't realize is that this really does make a huge difference.
In places like Alabama a guy named Perry Hooper Sr. was running for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in Alabama in 1994. He happened to be my political mentor, I knew him, I knew his family. We're doing a little mini-movie on this right now. And Judge Hooper was a very important person in my life and God rest his soul he was just a really great man.
But what happened to him was shocking. And America needs to understand this story. Here's what happened to this guy. He goes to bed on election night thinking he had won. First Republican ever elected to the Supreme Court in Alabama, and, as Chief Justice. This is a big deal in Alabama in 1994. He goes to bed thinking he had won by 15,000 votes, when he wakes up all of sudden there are all these... he's behind or a few ahead, and they're counting all these votes that shouldn't be counted. They immediately sued to stop the certification. He wasn't seated until 11 months later when the United States Supreme Court said two important things that are salient to this very day, Zak.
The first thing they said was, whatever the law is, not the rules, whatever the law is on election day, that's what prevails. Right. It doesn't matter if there are these consent decrees, it doesn't matter if somebody doesn't like it, it doesn't matter. Its what the law is that prevails. The Supreme Court was very clear on that.
The second thing they were very clear on was that there is no such thing as 'substantial compliance'. Meaning, "Oh, I meant to sign the back and I forgot" or "I didn't date it, I'm sorry." In Pennsylvania I think they settled it finally but that was what was happening, right, they didn't date these envelopes.
But the Hooper case was extremely clear. In fact, it was in part what helped the lawyers argue Bush v. Gore a few years after that. But now if you go look for Hooper... I mean Hornsby v. Alabama, if you go look for that case you can't find it. They've scrubbed it. Google scrubbed it, everybody scrubbed it. I've got a friend down in Montgomery, Alabama, at ... I'm from Alabama, and I've got a friend at the Supreme Court down there and he's looking around in the archives. They can't even find it.
We have it, but how could it be that something this monumental and this important to the country... and we went through 2020 and I'm probably the first person to ever tell you that that ruling exists, right?"
Zak Paine: "Never heard of it."
Gregg Phillips:
"They stopped the certification. And they said whatever the law is is the law. You don't like it, If you don't like it about the signatures, tough, get enough people and get the law changed. And this whole 'substantial compliance' "I meant to do it right" or "I almost got it right" is nonsense."
@43:00
Gregg Phillips:
"We have access to some extremely sophisticated Artificial Intelligence and if we deploy this in the proper way and people are coming up to box after box after box, as you said, that camera is right there in front of them and we deploy this and we have citizens that when those red lights start flashing saying "This person is known to this system, they've already been here, here's the seven place they've already been" and instantly packages it and we put it into... maybe somebody checks off on it, maybe we have some supervisors or something... then we hand it to the Sheriffs or we hand it to local PD, or hand it to a State PD if we have to. Then, that's what we want to do. Our biggest problem so far is politics and law enforcement."
@46:48
Gregg Phillips:
"We are going to see some really old, established fraud eco systems go down in this instance. Once we get that one in San Luiz and we nail these people, all of them, we know that through the funding sources that these eco systems exist in at least 60 other poor communities across the country and because we know have a much more clear sense of what that actually looks like and feels like we're going to be able to take that model and go to Sheriff, you know, John Doe in XYZ place in Texas and say, "Here's what happened in San Luiz." I think the biggest thing, Zak, for people to understand is... and this was hard for even us to understand because we wanted it all to be about election fraud, and it was. But what's really interesting about this is the election fraud is superfluous to what's actually the real deal. Because they need to get elected because they need to stay in power. Most of these are low level elected officials or supervisors, school boards, that kind of thing. But they need to be able to control all that federal money that's coming in, the food for the kids, and all the federal grants and everything that are coming in. But foundations, both national and international foundations that are pouring money into these communities and it is a flat out grift. I mean, some of these folks are making half a million dollars a year to nothing but sit on a non-profit board. It doesn't even make sense. You start putting all those pieces together and given some of the interviews we've heard. Its not just about sitting on this board or helping people with low income housing. Its about being on that bank board and getting a piece of that juice, its about being in the pocket of the pest control, being in the pocket of the road builders ans the roofers and all the different parts. We actually have testimony from one whistle blower who says this one particular person in San Luiz is into 27 different sources of income.
Zak Paine: "Is that the one who left the country?"
Gregg Phillips: "Could be." (Smiles) "Could be."
Zak Paine:
"You know you're doing it right when somebody runs and flees from the country so they can avoid prosecution."
3 June 2022 Red Pill News - Zak Paine Interview Gregg Phillips
@29:25
https://rumble.com/v178cw2-patriot-games-with-gregg-phillips-on-fri.-night-livestream.html
"They've been doing ballot harvesting for 107 years. There's no real magic to it all, right, other than its just different in different times. Like, in the late 1800's they made them start using glass balls to put their ballots in so they could actually see what they were putting in there and be sure they weren't cheating and doing something untoward. So everybody knows that this is happening and everybody knows these kinds of things go on. But what people don't realize is that this really does make a huge difference.
In places like Alabama a guy named Perry Hooper Sr. was running for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in Alabama in 1994. He happened to be my political mentor, I knew him, I knew his family. We're doing a little mini-movie on this right now. And Judge Hooper was a very important person in my life and God rest his soul he was just a really great man.
But what happened to him was shocking. And America needs to understand this story. Here's what happened to this guy. He goes to bed on election night thinking he had won. First Republican ever elected to the Supreme Court in Alabama, and, as Chief Justice. This is a big deal in Alabama in 1994. He goes to bed thinking he had won by 15,000 votes, when he wakes up all of sudden there are all these... he's behind or a few ahead, and they're counting all these votes that shouldn't be counted. They immediately sued to stop the certification. He wasn't seated until 11 months later when the United States Supreme Court said two important things that are salient to this very day, Zak.
The first thing they said was, whatever the law is, not the rules, whatever the law is on election day, that's what prevails. Right. It doesn't matter if there are these consent decrees, it doesn't matter if somebody doesn't like it, it doesn't matter. Its what the law is that prevails. The Supreme Court was very clear on that.
The second thing they were very clear on was that there is no such thing as 'substantial compliance'. Meaning, "Oh, I meant to sign the back and I forgot" or "I didn't date it, I'm sorry." In Pennsylvania I think they settled it finally but that was what was happening, right, they didn't date these envelopes.
But the Hooper case was extremely clear. In fact, it was in part what helped the lawyers argue Bush v. Gore a few years after that. But now if you go look for Hooper... I mean Hornsby v. Alabama, if you go look for that case you can't find it. They've scrubbed it. Google scrubbed it, everybody scrubbed it. I've got a friend down in Montgomery, Alabama, at ... I'm from Alabama, and I've got a friend at the Supreme Court down there and he's looking around in the archives. They can't even find it.
We have it, but how could it be that something this monumental and this important to the country... and we went through 2020 and I'm probably the first person to ever tell you that that ruling exists, right?"
Zak Paine: "Never heard of it."
Gregg Phillips:
"They stopped the certification. And they said whatever the law is is the law. You don't like it, If you don't like it about the signatures, tough, get enough people and get the law changed. And this whole 'substantial compliance' "I meant to do it right" or "I almost got it right" is nonsense."
@43:00
Gregg Phillips:
"We have access to some extremely sophisticated Artificial Intelligence and if we deploy this in the proper way and people are coming up to box after box after box, as you said, that camera is right there in front of them and we deploy this and we have citizens that when those red lights start flashing saying "This person is known to this system, they've already been here, here's the seven place they've already been" and instantly packages it and we put it into... maybe somebody checks off on it, maybe we have some supervisors or something... then we hand it to the Sheriffs or we hand it to local PD, or hand it to a State PD if we have to. Then, that's what we want to do. Our biggest problem so far is politics and law enforcement."
@46:48
"We are going to see some really old, established fraud eco systems go down in this instance. Once we get that one in San Luiz and we nail these people, all of them, we know that through the funding sources that these eco systems exist in at least 60 other poor communities across the country and because we know have a much more clear sense of what that actually looks like and feels like we're going to be able to take that model and go to Sheriff, you know, John Doe in XYZ place in Texas and say, "Here's what happened in San Luiz." I think the biggest thing, Zak, for people to understand is... and this was hard for even us to understand because we wanted it all to be about election fraud, and it was. But what's really interesting about this is the election fraud is superfluous to what's actually the real deal. Because they need to get elected because they need to stay in power. Most of these are low level elected officials or supervisors, school boards, that kind of thing. But they need to be able to control all that federal money that's coming in, the food for the kids, and all the federal grants and everything that are coming in. But foundations, both national and international foundations that are pouring money into these communities and it is a flat out grift. I mean, some of these folks are making half a million dollars a year to nothing but sit on a non-profit board. It doesn't even make sense. You start putting all those pieces together and given some of the interviews we've heard. Its not just about sitting on this board or helping people with low income housing. Its about being on that bank board and getting a piece of that juice, its about being in the pocket of the pest control, being in the pocket of the road builders ans the roofers and all the different parts. We actually have testimony from one whistle blower who says this one particular person in San Luiz is into 27 different sources of income.
Zak Paine: "Is that the one who left the country?"
Gregg Phillips: "Could be." (Smiles) "Could be."
Zak Paine:
"You know you're doing it right when somebody runs and flees from the country so they can avoid prosecution."
3 June 2022 Red Pill News - Zak Paine Interview Gregg Phillips
@29:25
https://rumble.com/v178cw2-patriot-games-with-gregg-phillips-on-fri.-night-livestream.html
"They've been doing ballot harvesting for 107 years. There's no real magic to it all, right, other than its just different in different times. Like, in the late 1800's they made them start using glass balls to put their ballots in so they could actually see what they were putting in there and be sure they weren't cheating and doing something untoward. So everybody knows that this is happening and everybody knows these kinds of things go on. But what people don't realize is that this really does make a huge difference.
In places like Alabama a guy named Perry Hooper Sr. was running for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in Alabama in 1994. He happened to be my political mentor, I knew him, I knew his family. We're doing a little mini-movie on this right now. And Judge Hooper was a very important person in my life and God rest his soul he was just a really great man.
But what happened to him was shocking. And America needs to understand this story. Here's what happened to this guy. He goes to bed on election night thinking he had won. First Republican ever elected to the Supreme Court in Alabama, and, as Chief Justice. This is a big deal in Alabama in 1994. He goes to bed thinking he had won by 15,000 votes, when he wakes up all of sudden there are all these... he's behind or a few ahead, and they're counting all these votes that shouldn't be counted. They immediately sued to stop the certification. He wasn't seated until 11 months later when the United States Supreme Court said two important things that are salient to this very day, Zak.
The first thing they said was, whatever the law is, not the rules, whatever the law is on election day, that's what prevails. Right. It doesn't matter if there are these consent decrees, it doesn't matter if somebody doesn't like it, it doesn't matter. Its what the law is that prevails. The Supreme Court was very clear on that.
The second thing they were very clear on was that there is no such thing as 'substantial compliance'. Meaning, "Oh, I meant to sign the back and I forgot" or "I didn't date it, I'm sorry." In Pennsylvania I think they settled it finally but that was what was happening, right, they didn't date these envelopes.
But the Hooper case was extremely clear. In fact, it was in part what helped the lawyers argue Bush v. Gore a few years after that. But now if you go look for Hooper... I mean Hornsby v. Alabama, if you go look for that case you can't find it. They've scrubbed it. Google scrubbed it, everybody scrubbed it. I've got a friend down in Montgomery, Alabama, at ... I'm from Alabama, and I've got a friend at the Supreme Court down there and he's looking around in the archives. They can't even find it.
We have it, but how could it be that something this monumental and this important to the country... and we went through 2020 and I'm probably the first person to ever tell you that that ruling exists, right?"
Zak Paine: "Never heard of it."
Gregg Phillips:
"They stopped the certification. And they said whatever the law is is the law. You don't like it, If you don't like it about the signatures, tough, get enough people and get the law changed. And this whole 'substantial compliance' "I meant to do it right" or "I almost got it right" is nonsense."
@43:
Gregg Phillips:
"We have access to some extremely sophisticated Artificial Intelligence and if we deploy this in the proper way and people are coming up to box after box after box, as you said, that camera is right there in front of them and we deploy this and we have citizens that when those red lights start flashing saying "This person is known to this system, they've already been here, here's the seven place they've already been" and instantly packages it and we put it into... maybe somebody checks off on it, maybe we have some supervisors or something... then we hand it to the Sheriffs or we hand it to local PD, or hand it to a State PD if we have to. Then, that's what we want to do. Our biggest problem so far is politics and law enforcement."
3 June 2022 Red Pill News - Zak Paine Interview Gregg Phillips
@29:25
https://rumble.com/v178cw2-patriot-games-with-gregg-phillips-on-fri.-night-livestream.html
"They've been doing ballot harvesting for 107 years. There's no real magic to it all, right, other than its just different in different times. Like, in the late 1800's they made them start using glass balls to put their ballots in so they could actually see what they were putting in there and be sure they weren't cheating and doing something untoward. So everybody knows that this is happening and everybody knows these kinds of things go on. But what people don't realize is that this really does make a huge difference.
In places like Alabama a guy named Perry Hooper Sr. was running for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in Alabama in 1994. He happened to be my political mentor, I knew him, I knew his family. We're doing a little mini-movie on this right now. And Judge Hooper was a very important person in my life and God rest his soul he was just a really great man.
But what happened to him was shocking. And America needs to understand this story. Here's what happened to this guy. He goes to bed on election night thinking he had won. First Republican ever elected to the Supreme Court in Alabama, and, as Chief Justice. This is a big deal in Alabama in 1994. He goes to bed thinking he had won by 15,000 votes, when he wakes up all of sudden there are all these... he's behind or a few ahead, and they're counting all these votes that shouldn't be counted. They immediately sued to stop the certification. He wasn't seated until 11 months later when the United States Supreme Court said two important things that are salient to this very day, Zak.
The first thing they said was, whatever the law is, not the rules, whatever the law is on election day, that's what prevails. Right. It doesn't matter if there are these consent decrees, it doesn't matter if somebody doesn't like it, it doesn't matter. Its what the law is that prevails. The Supreme Court was very clear on that.
The second thing they were very clear on was that there is no such thing as 'substantial compliance'. Meaning, "Oh, I meant to sign the back and I forgot" or "I didn't date it, I'm sorry." In Pennsylvania I think they settled it finally but that was what was happening, right, they didn't date these envelopes.
But the Hooper case was extremely clear. In fact, it was in part what helped the lawyers argue Bush v. Gore a few years after that. But now if you go look for Hooper... I mean Hornsby v. Alabama, if you go look for that case you can't find it. They've scrubbed it. Google scrubbed it, everybody scrubbed it. I've got a friend down in Montgomery, Alabama, at ... I'm from Alabama, and I've got a friend at the Supreme Court down there and he's looking around in the archives. They can't even find it.
We have it, but how could it be that something this monumental and this important to the country... and we went through 2020 and I'm probably the first person to ever tell you that that ruling exists, right?
Zak: Never heard of it.
Gregg Phillips:
They stopped the certification. And they said whatever the law is is the law. You don't like it, If you don't like it about the signatures, tough, get enough people and get the law changed. And this whole 'substantial compliance' "I meant to do it right" or "I almost got it right" is nonsense.