Interesting response. From my vantage point, you completely missed the intent and message of the post. But in hopes of dispelling any misunderstanding or misinterpretations for other board members, I'll be direct about the points you raise.
I trust Q. I trust also that Q knows what Q is doing, and whether, from Q's vantage point "we need Q" or not. That, however, is entirely besides the point of the post. A completely different topic. (Although, I'll admit; you have inspired me. Perhaps I'll make another post about why the Return if Q is a big deal, even if it isn't.)
Maybe you "didn't need Q to create a social club of anons who feel good vibes", but I think only a fool or a shill would deny the valuable spirit of solidarity and mutual support that the Great Awakening community (worldwide) has generated. If you have never needed the support from others, then I guess you're an island. Lucky you?
I concur that Q drops are comms on multiple levels, and I affirm that the communication to anons is only one aspect of that. I do not doubt the value or importance of Q posting (as you appear to be at pains to imply) nor do I denigrate the work of discerning the authenticity of Q's drops, recent or otherwise.
I'm not disparaging the analysis and discussion around "Is this Q? is this not Q? What's with the Trips? What's with the TOR? etc. etc." The more discussion the better.
I am, however, sharing, and in doing so, emphasizing, certain aspects of personal growth that I recognize the Q operation have yielded in me, personally. Why is that important? In my view, the Great Awakening is not simply a phenomena we are experiencing socially or politically, but is also an individual and internal experience. The world cannot wake up unless the individuals in the world wake up. The vast majority of my interactions with other anons, both online and offline, affirms that belief.
"I'm not too cool for Q..... denigrate....imply.... suggest.... intensely discoursing about Q". Either this whole paragraph is a dig at me, or you genuinely and simply were too triggered to read the post.
I'd like to address each of the insulting implications you make in this paragraph, but I'm not going to.
By the way, a few days ago I posted an in-depth analysis and dissection of the most recent drop. Why don't you check it out and let me know what you think?
Not a brilliant dissection perhaps, but certainly I invested some effort. Either way, in the light of that post, it's really quite inane of you to accuse me of saying it is a sign of immaturity to dissect new drops. <facepalm>
You commented in other threads about the vice of jealousy. I suggest you reflect on the attitudes of haughtiness and pride?
Sadly, you took a post about an internal experience of one anon reflecting on the personal growth and personal changes I've observed in light of the return of Q, and turned it into an attack on other anons, an attack on the value of Q, and a denigration of the value of Q's work.
Why would you do that?
Is it perhaps because you lack the capacity to see or conceive of the Q ~ anon relationship or operation in any terms other than your own experience?
Interesting response. From my vantage point, you completely missed the intent and message of the post. But in hopes of dispelling any misunderstanding or misinterpretations for other board members, I'll be direct about the points you raise.
I trust Q. I trust also that Q knows what Q is doing, and whether, from Q's vantage point "we need Q" or not. That, however, is entirely besides the point of the post. A completely different topic. (Although, I'll admit; you have inspired me. Perhaps I'll make another post about why the Return if Q is a big deal, even if it isn't.)
Maybe you "didn't need Q to create a social club of anons who feel good vibes", but I think only a fool or a shill would deny the valuable spirit of solidarity and mutual support that the Great Awakening community (worldwide) has generated. If you have never needed the support from others, then I guess you're an island. Lucky you?
I concur that Q drops are comms on multiple levels, and I affirm that the communication to anons is only one aspect of that. I do not doubt the value or importance of Q posting (as you appear to be at pains to imply) nor do I denigrate the work of discerning the authenticity of Q's drops, recent or otherwise.
I'm not disparaging the analysis and discussion around "Is this Q? is this not Q? What's with the Trips? What's with the TOR? etc. etc." The more discussion the better.
I am, however, sharing, and in doing so, emphasizing certain aspects of personal growth that I recognize the Q operation have yielded in me, personally. Why is that important? In my view, the Great Awakening is not simply a phenomena we are experiencing socially or politically, but is also an individual and internal experience. The world cannot wake up unless the individuals in the world wake up. The vast majority of my interactions with other anons, both online and offline, affirms that belief.
"I'm not too cool for Q..... denigrate....imply.... suggest.... intensely discoursing about Q". Either this whole paragraph is a dig at me, or you genuinely and simply were too triggered to read the post.
I'd like to address each of the insulting implications you make in this paragraph, but I'm not going to.
By the way, a few days ago I posted an in-depth analysis and dissection of the most recent drop. Why don't you check it out and let me know what you think?
Not a brilliant dissection perhaps, but certainly I invested some effort. Either way, in the light of that post, it's really quite inane of you to accuse me of saying it is a sign of immaturity to dissect new drops. <facepalm>
You commented in other threads about the vice of jealousy. I suggest you reflect on the attitudes of haughtiness and pride?
Sadly, you took a post about an internal experience of one anon reflecting on the personal growth and personal changes I've observed in light of the return of Q, and turned it into an attack on other anons, an attack on the value of Q, and a denigration of the value of Q's work.
Why would you do that?
Is it perhaps because you lack the capacity to see or conceive of the Q ~ anon relationship or operation in any terms other than your own experience?
Interesting response. From my vantage point, you completely missed the intent and message of the post. But in hopes of dispelling any misunderstanding or misinterpretations for other board members, I'll be direct about the points you raise.
I trust Q. I trust also that Q knows what Q is doing, and whether, from Q's vantage point "we need Q" or not. That, however, is entirely besides the point of the post. A completely different topic. (Although, I'll admit; you have inspired me. Perhaps I'll make another post about why the Return if Q is a big deal, even if it isn't.)
Maybe you "didn't need Q to create a social club of anons who feel good vibes", but I think only a fool or a shill would deny the valuable spirit of solidarity and mutual support that the Great Awakening community (worldwide) has generated. If you have never needed the support from others, then I guess you're an island. Lucky you?
I concur that Q drops are comms on multiple levels, and I affirm that the communication to anons is only one aspect of that. I do not doubt the value or important Q posting (as you appear to be at pains to imply) nor do I denigrate the work of discerning the authenticity of Q's drops, recent or otherwise.
I'm not disparaging the analysis and discussion around "Is this Q? is this not Q? What's with the Trips? What's with the TOR? etc. etc." The more discussion the better.
I am, however, sharing, and in doing so, emphasizing certain aspects of personal growth that I recognize the Q operation have yielded in me, personally. Why is that important? In my view, the Great Awakening is not simply a phenomena we are experiencing socially or politically, but is also an individual and internal experience. The world cannot wake up unless the individuals in the world wake up. The vast majority of my interactions with other anons, both online and offline, affirms that belief.
"I'm not too cool for Q..... denigrate....imply.... suggest.... intensely discoursing about Q". Either this whole paragraph is a dig at me, or you genuinely and simply were too triggered to read the post.
I'd like to address each of the insulting implications you make in this paragraph, but I'm not going to.
By the way, a few days ago I posted an in-depth analysis and dissection of the most recent drop. Why don't you check it out and let me know what you think?
Not a brilliant dissection perhaps, but certainly I invested some effort. Either way, in the light of that post, it's really quite inane of you to accuse me of saying it is a sign of immaturity to dissect new drops. <facepalm>
You commented in other threads about the vice of jealousy. I suggest you reflect on the attitudes of haughtiness and pride?
Sadly, you took a post about an internal experience of one anon reflecting on the personal growth and personal changes I've observed in light of the return of Q, and turned it into an attack on other anons, an attack on the value of Q, and a denigration of the value of Q's work.
Why would you do that?
Is it perhaps because you lack the capacity to see or conceive of the Q ~ anon relationship or operation in any terms other than your own experience?
Interesting response. From my vantage point, you completely missed the intent and message of the post. But in hopes of dispelling any misunderstanding or misinterpretations for other board members, I'll be direct about the points you raise.
I trust Q. I trust also that Q knows what Q is doing, and whether, from Q's vantage point "we need Q" or not. That, however, is entirely besides the point of the post. A completely different topic. (Although, I'll admit; you have inspired me. Perhaps I'll make another post about why the Return if Q is a big deal, even if it isn't.)
Maybe you "didn't need Q to create a social club of anons who feel good vibes", but I think only a fool or a shill would deny the valuable spirit of solidarity and mutual support that the Great Awakening community (worldwide) has generated. If you have never needed the support from others, then I guess you're an island. Lucky you?
I concur that Q drops are comms on multiple levels, and I affirm that the communication to anons is only one aspect of that. I do not doubt the value or important Q posting (as you appear to be at pains to imply) nor do I denigrate the work of discerning the authenticity of Q's drops, recent or otherwise.
I'm not disparaging the analysis and discussion around "Is this Q? is this not Q? What's with the Trips? What's with the TOR? etc. etc." The more discussion the better.
I am, however, sharing, and in doing so, emphasizing certain aspects of personal growth that I recognize the Q operation have yielded in me, personally. Why is that important? In my view, the Great Awakening is not simply a phenomena we are experiencing socially or politically, but is also an individual and internal experience. The world cannot wake up unless the individuals in the world wake up. The vast majority of my interactions with other anons, both online and offline, affirms that belief.
"I'm not too cool for Q..... denigrate....imply.... suggest.... intensely discoursing about Q". Either this whole paragraph is a dig at me, or you genuinely and simply were too triggered to read the post.
I'd like to address each of the insulting implications you make in this paragraph, but I'm not going to.
By the way, a few days ago I posted an in-depth analysis and dissection of the most recent drop. Why don't you check it out and let me know what you think?
Not a brilliant dissection perhaps, but certainly I invested some effort. Either way, in the light of that post, it's really quite inane of you to accuse me of saying it is a sign of immaturity to dissect new drops. <facepalm>
You commented in other threads about the vice of jealousy. I suggest you reflect on the attitudes of haughtiness and pride?
Sadly, you took a post about an internal experience of one anon reflecting on the personal growth and personal changes I've observed in light of the return of Q, and turned it into an attack on other anons, an attack on the value of Q, and a denigration of the value of Q's work.
Why would you do that? Is it perhaps because you lack the capacity to see the Q anon relationship in any terms other than your own experience? Again, lucky you?
Interesting response. From my vantage point, you completely missed the intent and message of the post. But in hopes of dispelling any misunderstanding or misinterpretations for other board members, I'll be direct about the points you raise.
I trust Q. I trust also that Q knows what Q is doing, and whether, from Q's vantage point "we need Q" or not. That, however, is entirely besides the point of the post. A completely different topic. (Although, I'll admit; you have inspired me. Perhaps I'll make another post about why the Return if Q is a big deal, even if it isn't.)
Maybe you "didn't need Q to create a social club of anons who feel good vibes", but I think only a fool or a shill would deny the valuable spirit of solidarity and mutual support that the Great Awakening community (worldwide) has generated. If you have never needed the support from others, then I guess you're an island. Lucky you?
I concur that Q drops are comms on multiple levels, and I affirm that the communication to anons is only one aspect of that. I do not doubt the value or important Q posting (as you appear to be at pains to imply) nor do I denigrate the work of discerning the authenticity of Q's drops, recent or otherwise.
I'm not disparaging the analysis and discussion around "Is this Q? is this not Q? What's with the Trips? What's with the TOR? etc. etc." The more discussion the better.
I am, however, sharing, and in doing so, emphasizing certain aspects of personal growth that I recognize the Q operation have yielded in me, personally. Why is that important? In my view, the Great Awakening is not simply a phenomena we are experiencing socially or politically, but is also an individual and internal experience. The world cannot wake up unless the individuals in the world wake up. The vast majority of my interactions with other anons, both online and offline, affirms that belief.
"I'm not too cool for Q..... denigrate....imply.... suggest.... intensely discoursing about Q". Either this whole paragraph is a dig at me, or you genuinely and simply were too triggered to read the post.
I'd like to address each of the insulting implications you make in this paragraph, but I'm not going to.
By the way, a few days ago I posted an in-depth analysis and dissection of the most recent drop. Why don't you check it out and let me know what you think?
Not a brilliant dissection perhaps, but certainly I invested some effort. Either way, in the light of that post, it's really quite inane of you to accuse me of saying it is a sign of immaturity to dissect new drops. <facepalm>
You commented in other threads about the vice of jealousy. I suggest you reflect on the attitudes of haughtiness and pride?
Sadly, you took a post about an internal experience of one anon reflecting on the personal growth and personal changes I've observed in light of the return of Q, and turned it into an attack on other anons, an attack on the value of Q, and a denigration of the value of Q's work.
Why would you do that?
Interesting response. From my vantage point, you completely missed the intent and message of the post. But in hopes of dispelling any misunderstanding or misinterpretations for other board members, I'll be direct about the points you raise.
I trust Q. I trust also that Q knows what Q is doing, and whether, from Q's vantage point "we need Q" or not. That, however, is entirely besides the point of the post. A completely different topic. (Although, I'll admit; you have inspired me. Perhaps I'll make another post about why the Return if Q is a big deal, even if it isn't.)
Maybe you "didn't need Q to create a social club of anons who feel good vibes", but I think only a fool or a shill would deny the valuable spirit of solidarity and mutual support that the Great Awakening community (worldwide) has generated. If you have never needed the support from others, then I guess you're an island. Lucky you?
I concur that Q drops are comms on multiple levels, and I affirm that the communication to anons is only one aspect of that. I do not doubt the value or important Q posting (as you appear to be at pains to imply) nor do I denigrate the work of discerning the authenticity of Q's drops, recent or otherwise.
I'm not disparaging the analysis and discussion around "Is this Q? is this not Q? What's with the Trips? What's with the TOR? etc. etc." The more discussion the better.
I am, however, sharing, and in doing so, emphasizing certain aspects of personal growth that I recognize the Q operation have yielded in me, personally. Why is that important? In my view, the Great Awakening is not simply a phenomena we are experiencing socially or politically, but is also an individual and internal experience. The world cannot wake up unless the individuals in the world wake up. The vast majority of my interactions with other anons, both online and offline, affirms that belief.
"I'm not too cool for Q..... denigrate....imply.... suggest.... intensely discoursing about Q". Either this whole paragraph is a dig at me, or you genuinely and simply were too triggered to read the post.
I'd like to address each of the insulting implications you make in this paragraph, but I'm not going to.
By the way, a few days ago I did an in-depth analysis and dissection of the most recent drop. Not a brilliant dissection perhaps, but certainly I invested some effort. In that light, it's really quite inane of you to directly accuse me of saying it is a sign of immaturity to dissect new drops. <facepalm>
You spoke in other threads about the vice of jealousy. I suggest you reflect on the attitudes of haughtiness and pride.
You took a post about an internal experience of one anon reflecting on the personal growth and personal changes I've observed in light of the return of Q, and turned it into an attack on other anons, an attack on the value of Q, and a denigration of the value of Q's work.
Why would you do that?
Interesting response. From my vantage point, you completely missed the intent and message of the post. But in hopes of dispelling any misunderstanding or misinterpretations for other board members, I'll be direct about the points you raise.
I trust Q. I trust also that Q knows what Q is doing, and whether, from Q's vantage point "we need Q" or not. That, however, is entirely besides the point of the post. A completely different topic. (Although, I'll admit; you have inspired me. Perhaps I'll make another post about why the Return if Q is a big deal, even if it isn't.)
Maybe you "didn't need Q to create a social club of anons who feel good vibes", but I think only a fool or a shill would deny the valuable spirit of solidarity and mutual support that the Great Awakening community (worldwide) has generated. If you have never needed the support from others, then I guess you're an island. Lucky you?
I concur that Q drops are comms on multiple levels, and I affirm that the communication to anons is only one aspect of that. I do not doubt the value or important Q posting (as you appear to be at pains to imply) nor do I denigrate the work of discerning the authenticity of Q's drops, recent or otherwise.
I'm not disparaging the analysis and discussion around "Is this Q? is this not Q? What's with the Trips? What's with the TOR? etc. etc." The more discussion the better.
I am, however, sharing, and in doing so, emphasizing certain aspects of personal growth that I recognize the Q operation have yielded in me, personally. Why is that important? In my view, the Great Awakening is not simply a phenomena we are experiencing socially or politically, but is also an individual and internal experience. The world cannot wake up unless the individuals in the world wake up. The vast majority of my interactions with other anons, both online and offline, affirms that belief.
"I'm not too cool for Q..... denigrate....imply.... suggest.... intensely discoursing about Q". Either this whole paragraph is a dig at me, or you genuinely and simply were too triggered to read the post.
I'd like to address each of the insulting statements you make in this paragraph, but I'm not going to.
By the way, a few days ago I did an in-depth analysis and dissection of the most recent drop. Not a brilliant dissection perhaps, but certainly I invested some effort. In that light, it's really quite inane of you to directly accuse me of saying it is a sign of immaturity to dissect new drops. <facepalm>
You spoke in other threads about the vice of jealousy. I suggest you reflect on the attitudes of haughtiness and pride.
You took a post about an internal experience of one anon reflecting on the personal growth and personal changes I've observed in light of the return of Q, and turned it into an attack on other anons, an attack on the value of Q, and a denigration of the value of Q's work.
Why would you do that?
Interesting response. From my vantage point, you completely missed the intent and message of the post. But in hopes of dispelling any misunderstanding or misinterpretations for other board members, I'll be direct about the points you raise.
I trust Q. I trust also that Q knows what Q is doing, and whether, from Q's vantage point "we need Q" or not. That, however, is entirely besides the point of the post. A completely different topic. (Although, I'll admit; you have inspired me. Perhaps I'll make another post about why the Return if Q is a big deal, even if it isn't.)
Maybe you "didn't need Q to create a social club of anons who feel good vibes", but I think only a fool or a shill would deny the valuable spirit of solidarity and mutual support that the Great Awakening community (worldwide) has generated. If you have never needed the support from others, then I guess you're an island. Lucky you?
I concur that Q drops are comms on multiple levels, and I affirm that the communication to anons is only one aspect of that. I do not doubt the value or important Q posting (as you appear to be at pains to imply) nor do I denigrate the work of discerning the authenticity of Q's drops, recent or otherwise.
I'm not disparaging the analysis and discussion around "Is this Q? is this not Q? What's with the Trips? What's with the TOR? etc. etc." The more discussion the better.
I am, however, sharing, and in doing so, emphasizing certain aspects of personal growth that the Q operation have yielded in me, personally. In my view, the Great Awakening is not simply a phenomena we are experiencing socially or politically, but is also an individual and internal experience. The vast majority of my interactions with other anons, both online and offline, affirms that belief.
"I'm not too cool for Q..... denigrate....imply.... suggest.... intensely discoursing about Q". Either this whole paragraph is a dig at me, or you genuinely and simply were too triggered to read the post.
I'd like to address each of the insulting statements you make in this paragraph, but I'm not going to.
By the way, a few days ago I did an in-depth analysis and dissection of the most recent drop. Not a brilliant dissection perhaps, but certainly I invested some effort. In that light, it's really quite inane of you to directly accuse me of saying it is a sign of immaturity to dissect new drops. <facepalm>
You spoke in other threads about the vice of jealousy. I suggest you reflect on the attitudes of haughtiness and pride.
You took a post about an internal experience of one anon reflecting on the personal growth and personal changes I've observed in light of the return of Q, and turned it into an attack on other anons, an attack on the value of Q, and a denigration of the value of Q's work.
Why would you do that?