Exactly.
This guy didn't say anything, and provided no proof, evidence, or logical argument for why he would think it.
The virus does not exist. Full stop.
However, people HAVE been sick. The rate of sickness in the population has been about the same as every other year (the same percentage of the population). That is, until the fake vaxx was injected, when the rates went up. As long as people keep their eyes closed to the fact that the sickness was NOT caused by a virus (which does not exist, and therefore cannot cause sickness), there will not be many people studying why they REALLY got sick.
Maybe there IS something happening in all those biolabs. They are being funded with billions of dollars, after all. Either they are working on something sinister, or they are just using them to siphon tax money off the system, and laughing all the way to the bank.
This guy worked for Lancet. What would he say about what a former Lancet editor had to say about the so-called "science" published in journals today:
Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet ... states that “much of the scientific literature [published in Lancet and other journals], perhaps half, may simply be untrue.”
Exactly.
This guy didn't say anything, and provided no proof, evidence, or logical argument for why he would think it.
The virus does not exist. Full stop.
However, people HAVE been sick. The rate of sickness in the population has been about the same as every other year (the same percentage of the population). That is, until the fake vaxx was injected, when the rates went up. As long as people keep their eyes closed to the fact that the sickness was NOT caused by a virus (which does not exist, and therefore cannot cause sickness), there will not be many people studying why they REALLY got sick.
Maybe there IS something happening in all those biolabs. They are being funded with billions of dollars, after all. Either they are working on something sinister, or they are just using them to siphon tax money off the system, and laughing all the way to the bank.
This guy worked for Lancet. What would he say about this:
Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet ... states that “much of the scientific literature [published in Lancet and other journals], perhaps half, may simply be untrue.”