Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

So you didn't see the livestream with Jim and 'babyfist', sgt B, and some other fella (the one where Watkins was discussing putting a hit on Fredrick Brennan, hey it "only costs $15,000" which Brennan is worried about enough to get the FBI involved) and the 3 stooges with him were boasting of being No Such Agency (but not the NSA) and running a 'white hat op' and laughing about it. One of them made the B post on Qs board a while ago, almost certainly the same person who made the 'latest' Q posts; consensus seems to be it was 'babyfist'.

When Q moved to 8chan he demanded his own board that nobody else could access and that it wouldn't be 'adminized'. Ron agreed to this but he is no longer part of 8kun and is running for Congress. While all this shit has been going on with the fake new Q posts, someone was banned from Qs board. Q cannot ban the admin, but an admin could ban Q.

Meanwhile a second Q pops up posting on /hivemind (where the old Anons went after they complained /qresearch was becoming comped and full of bots, and various drama with Jim and his cronies - you know the Anons who actually provided the research digs from the clues Q left because Q never actually gave any info, he can't, he asked questions and dropped clues, it was the Anons who provided the info and many of them are on /hivemind or pissed off elsewhere especially after Jan 21.

Those Anons proved that the Q posts were not Q on their threads, the 2nd Q without the tripcode who complained he was locked out, MAY have been legit but that isn't proven yet. The deltas and proofs are what 'proves' Q not posting with an unsecure tripcode, which merely identifies and he frequently changes it (as has been shown you can post with many of Qs tripcodes even on 4chan, they work on both sites). Ron doesn't appear to be involved in the shenanigans, but Jim most definitely does.

The Anons aren't attacking Q, they are Q researchers, they are making sure bad actors are not passing themselves off as Q and muddying the water. Jim owns the whole of 8kun so he may very well close that board to silence his critics.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

So you didn't see the livestream with Jim and 'babyfist', sgt B, and some other fella (the one where Watkins was discussing putting a hit on Fredrick Brennan, hey it "only costs $15,000" which Brennan is worried about enough to get the FBI involved) and the 3 stooges with him were boasting of being No Such Agency (but not the NSA) and running a 'white hat op' and laughing about it. One of them made the B post on Qs board a while ago, almost certainly the same person who made the 'latest' Q posts; consensus seems to be it was 'babyfist'.

When Q moved to 8chan he demanded his own board that nobody else could access and that it wouldn't be 'adminized'. Ron agreed to this but he is no longer part of 8kun and is running for Senate/Congress. While all this shit has been going on with the fake new Q posts, someone was banned from Qs board. Q cannot ban the admin, but an admin could ban Q.

Meanwhile a second Q pops up posting on /hivemind (where the old Anons went after they complained /qresearch was becoming comped and full of bots, and various drama with Jim and his cronies - you know the Anons who actually provided the research digs from the clues Q left because Q never actually gave any info, he can't, he asked questions and dropped clues, it was the Anons who provided the info and many of them are on /hivemind or pissed off elsewhere especially after Jan 21.

Those Anons proved that the Q posts were not Q on their threads, the 2nd Q without the tripcode who complained he was locked out, MAY have been legit but that isn't proven yet. The deltas and proofs are what 'proves' Q not posting with an unsecure tripcode, which merely identifies and he frequently changes it (as has been shown you can post with many of Qs tripcodes even on 4chan, they work on both sites). Ron doesn't appear to be involved in the shenanigans, but Jim most definitely does.

The Anons aren't attacking Q, they are Q researchers, they are making sure bad actors are not passing themselves off as Q and muddying the water. Jim owns the whole of 8kun so he may very well close that board to silence his critics.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

So you didn't see the livestream with Jim and 'babyfist', sgt B, and some other fella (the one where Watkins was discussing putting a hit on Fredrick Brennan, hey it "only costs $15,000" which Brennan is worried about enough to get the FBI involved) and the 3 stooges with him were boasting of being No Such Agency (but not the NSA) and running a 'white hat op' and laughing about it. One of them made the B post on Qs board a while ago, almost certainly the same person who made the 'latest' Q posts; consensus seems to be it was 'babyfist'.

When Q moved to 8chan he demanded his own board that nobody else could access and that it wouldn't be 'adminized'. Ron agreed to this but he is no longer part of 8kun and is running for Senate. While all this shit has been going on with the fake new Q posts, someone was banned from Qs board. Q cannot ban the admin, but an admin could ban Q.

Meanwhile a second Q pops up posting on /hivemind (where the old Anons went after they complained /qresearch was becoming comped and full of bots, and various drama with Jim and his cronies - you know the Anons who actually provided the research digs from the clues Q left because Q never actually gave any info, he can't, he asked questions and dropped clues, it was the Anons who provided the info and many of them are on /hivemind or pissed off elsewhere especially after Jan 21.

Those Anons proved that the Q posts were not Q on their threads, the 2nd Q without the tripcode who complained he was locked out, MAY have been legit but that isn't proven yet. The deltas and proofs are what 'proves' Q not posting with an unsecure tripcode, which merely identifies and he frequently changes it (as has been shown you can post with many of Qs tripcodes even on 4chan, they work on both sites). Ron doesn't appear to be involved in the shenanigans, but Jim most definitely does.

The Anons aren't attacking Q, they are Q researchers, they are making sure bad actors are not passing themselves off as Q and muddying the water. Jim owns the whole of 8kun so he may very well close that board to silence his critics.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

So you didn't see the livestream with Jim and 'babyfist', sgt B, and some other fella (the one where Watkins was discussing putting a hit on Frederick Brennan, hey it "only costs $15,000" which Brennan is worried about enough to get the FBI involved) and the 3 stooges with him were boasting of being No Such Agency (but not the NSA) and running a 'white hat op' and laughing about it. One of them made the B post on Qs board a while ago, almost certainly the same person who made the 'latest' Q posts; consensus seems to be it was 'babyfist'.

When Q moved to 8chan he demanded his own board that nobody else could access and that it wouldn't be 'adminized'. Ron agreed to this but he is no longer part of 8kun and is running for Senate. While all this shit has been going on with the fake new Q posts, someone was banned from Qs board. Q cannot ban the admin, but an admin could ban Q.

Meanwhile a second Q pops up posting on /hivemind (where the old Anons went after they complained /qresearch was becoming comped and full of bots, and various drama with Jim and his cronies - you know the Anons who actually provided the research digs from the clues Q left because Q never actually gave any info, he can't, he asked questions and dropped clues, it was the Anons who provided the info and many of them are on /hivemind or pissed off elsewhere especially after Jan 21.

Those Anons proved that the Q posts were not Q on their threads, the 2nd Q without the tripcode who complained he was locked out, MAY have been legit but that isn't proven yet. The deltas and proofs are what 'proves' Q not posting with an unsecure tripcode, which merely identifies and he frequently changes it (as has been shown you can post with many of Qs tripcodes even on 4chan, they work on both sites). Ron doesn't appear to be involved in the shenanigans, but Jim most definitely does.

The Anons aren't attacking Q, they are Q researchers, they are making sure bad actors are not passing themselves off as Q and muddying the water. Jim owns the whole of 8kun so he may very well close that board to silence his critics.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

So you didn't see the livestream with Jim and 'babyfist', sgt B, and some other fella (the one where Watkins was discussing putting a hit on Frederick Brennan, hey it "only costs $15,000" which Brennan is worried about enough to get the FBI involved) and the 3 stooges with him were boasting of being No Such Agency (but not the NSA) and running a 'white hat op' and laughing about it. One of them made the B post on Qs board a while ago, almost certainly the same person who made the 'latest' Q posts; consensus seems to be it was 'babyfist'.

When Q moved to 8chan he demanded his own board that nobody else could access and that it wouldn't be 'adminized'. Ron agreed to this but he is no longer part of 8kun and is running for Senate. While all this shit has been going on with the fake new Q posts, someone was banned from Qs board. Q cannot ban the admin, but an admin could ban Q.

Meanwhile a second Q pops up posting on /hivemind (where the old Anons went after they complained /qresearch was becoming comped and full of bots, and various drama with Jim and his cronies - you know the Anons who actually provided the research digs from the clues Q left because Q never actually gave any info, he can't, he asked questions and dropped clues, it was the Anons who provided the info and many of them are on /hivemind or pissed off elsewhere especially after Jan 21.

Those Anons proved that the Q posts were not Q on their threads, the 2nd Q without the tripcode who comlained he was locked out, MAY have been legit but that isn't proven yet. The deltas and proofs are what 'proves' Q not posting with an unsecure tripcode, which merely identifies and he frequently changes it (as has been shown you can post with many of Qs tripcodes even on 4chan, they work on both sites). Ron doesn't appear to be involved in the shenanigans, but Jim most definitely does.

The Anons aren't attacking Q, they are Q researchers, they are making sure bad actors are not passing themselves off as Q and muddying the water. Jim owns the whole of 8kun so he may very well close that board to silence his critics.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

So you didn't see the livestream with Jim and 'babyfist', sgt B, and some other fella (the one where Watkins was discussing putting a hit on Frederick Brennan, hey it "only costs $15,000" which Brennan is worried about enough to get the FBI involved) and the 3 stooges with him were boasting of being No Such Agency (but not the NSA) and running a 'white hat op' and laughing about it. One of them made the B post on Qs board a while ago, almost certainly the same person who made the 'latest' Q posts; consensus seems to be it was 'babyfist'.

When Q moved to 8chan he demanded his own board that nobody else could access and that it wouldn't be 'adminized'. Ron agreed to this but he is no longer part of 8kun and is running for Senate. While all this shit has been going on with the fake new Q posts, someone was banned from Qs board. Q cannot ban the admin, but an admin could ban Q.

Meanwhile a second Q pops up posting on /hivemind (where the old Anons went after they complained /qresearch was becoming comped and full of bots, and various drama with Jim and his cronies - you know the Anons who actually provided the research digs from the clues Q left because Q never actually gave any info, he can't, he asked questions and dropped clues, it was the Anons who provided the info and many of them are on /hivemind or pissed off elsewhere especially after Jan 21.

Those Anons proved that the Q posts were not Q on their threads, the 2nd Q without the tripcode MAY have been legit but that isn't proven yet. The deltas and proofs are what 'proves' Q not posting with an unsecure tripcode, which merely identifies and he frequently changes it (as has been shown you can post with many of Qs tripcodes even on 4chan, they work on both sites). Ron doesn't appear to be involved in the shenanigans, but Jim most definitely does.

The Anons aren't attacking Q, they are Q researchers, they are making sure bad actors are not passing themselves off as Q and muddying the water. Jim owns the whole of 8kun so he may very well close that board to silence his critics.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

So you didn't see the livestream with Jim and 'babyfist', sgt B, and some other fella (the one where Watkins was discussing putting a hit on Frederick Brennan, hey it "only costs $15,000" which Brennan is woried about enough to get the FBI involved) and the 3 stooges with him were boasting of being No Such Agency (but not the NSA) and running a 'white hat op' and laughing about it. One of them made the B post on Qs board a while ago, almost certainly the same person who made the 'latest' Q posts; consensus seems to be it was 'babyfist'.

When Q moved to 8chan he demanded his own board that nobody else could access and that it wouldn't be 'adminized'. Ron agreed to this but he is no longer part of 8kun and is running for Senate. While all this shit has been going on with the fake new Q posts, someone was banned from Qs board. Q cannot ban the admin, but an admin could ban Q.

Meanwhile a second Q pops up posting on /hivemind (where the old Anons went after they complained /qresearch was becoming comped and full of bots, and various drama with Jim and his cronies - you know the Anons who actually provided the research digs from the clues Q left because Q never actually gave any info, he can't, he asked questions and dropped clues, it was the Anons who provided the info and many of them are on /hivemind or pissed off elsewhere especially after Jan 21.

Those Anons proved that the Q posts were not Q on their threads, the 2nd Q without the tripcode MAY have been legit but that isn't proven yet. The deltas and proofs are what 'proves' Q not posting with an unsecure tripcode, which merely identifies and he frequently changes it (as has been shown you can post with many of Qs tripcodes even on 4chan, they work on both sites). Ron doesn't appear to be involved in the shenanigans, but Jim most definitely does.

The Anons aren't attacking Q, they are Q researchers, they are making sure bad actors are not passing themselves off as Q and muddying the water.

1 year ago
1 score