Yes. The actual mechanism for the "lunar landing movie" was a plane flying slow over the desert recording terrain details, then they made this "terrain flyover video" black&white and modified frame rate to match a "simulated lander speed". Unclear if they used a bombing range already with craters or created some specifically for this "filming".

But the big giveaway in the "movie" is the angle and type of the shadows in all the moon landing photos that indicates studio lighting; and the flimsy lunar lander without enough structural strength to support the estimated impact forces of a landing (with its presumed mass of 2 astronauts, supplies, and re-launch fuel, all times the Gload of impact). This is why the joyriding rover is just ridiculous...

Oops...Getting mass downvoted now...shills and glowie suppression order 66 in effect?

Yes. The actual mechanism for the "lunar landing movie" was a plane flying slow over the desert recording terrain details, then they made this "terrain flyover video" black&white and modified frame rate to match a "simulated lander speed". Unclear if they used a bombing range already with craters or created some specifically for this "filming".

But the big giveaway in the "movie" is the angle and type of the shadows in all the moon landing photos that indicates studio lighting; and the flimsy lunar lander without enough structural strength to support the estimated impact forces of a landing (with its presumed weight of 2 astronauts, supplies, and re-launch fuel, all times the Gload of impact). This is why the joyriding rover is just ridiculous...