You're wrong about Bitcoin; first of all Bitcoin never claimed to be anonymous and untraceable, in-fact it claims the exact opposite in the white-paper. It's traceable by design. You can now operate with other cryptocurrencies however (e.g. ZKSync Ethereum) which are truly untraceable due to the nature of ZKProofs, and that's a math proof of untracability, not just a speculation, it is not wrong.

Bitcoin is a middle finger to the establishment and cabal. Bitcoin throws a wrench in their plans which is why they are desparate to offset it within their own digital currencies (note: digital, not crypto, there is a huge difference, cryptocurrencies can't be controlled).

Also Bitcoin is not centralized; I don't know why you made that claim and then offered nothing to back it up. Bitcoin is fully decentralized, I myself run my own node and process my own transactions and distribute them to the peer-to-peer network, so what you've claimed is just patently wrong.

You're wrong about Bitcoin; first of all Bitcoin never claimed to be anonymous and untraceable, in-fact it claims the exact opposite in the white-paper. It's traceable by design. You can now operate with other cryptocurrencies however (e.g. ZKSync Ethereum) which are truly untraceable due to the nature of ZKProofs, and that's a math proof of intractability, not just a speculation, it is not wrong.

Bitcoin is a middle finger to the establishment and cabal. Bitcoin throws a wrench in their plans which is why they are desparate to offset it within their own digital currencies (note: digital, not crypto, there is a huge difference, cryptocurrencies can't be controlled).

Also Bitcoin is not centralized; I don't know why you made that claim and then offered nothing to back it up. Bitcoin is fully decentralized, I myself run my own node and process my own transactions and distribute them to the peer-to-peer network, so what you've claimed is just patently wrong.