Viruses can be seen with several microscopic techniques. They range in size from 20-400 nm.

That is false.

Virologists have never seen a virus in a microscope. Never.

You do not understand the process they use.

They take a fluid sample from someone, and then they add several other fluids, including gentimicin, which is toxic to kidney cells, and then they spread the mixture on monkey kidney cells ("vero cells"), and then the kidney cells break down (due to the toxins added), and then they use an electron microscope (NOT a regular microscope), to take pictures.

An electron microscope takes PICTURES. You do not look into it to "see stuff."

The pictures produced by the electron micoscope shows debris, which are left over particles from the breakdown of the kidney cells.

Virologists then CLAIM that those particules (which is what you are referring to) are "the virus," when in fact there is NO EVIDENCE that it is. It is nothing more than an UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIM. ZERO "science" to back it up. ZERO.

Those 20-400 nm particules you mentioned are from PHOTOS and ASSUMED to be a virus.

In fact, they are nothing more than cellular debris from the PROCESS they use.

This has now been proven, scientifically, by virologist Stefan Lanka and his team, in April 2021.

Viruses can be seen with several microscopic techniques. They range in size from 20-400 nm.

That is false.

Virologists have never seen a virus in a microscope. Never.

You do not understand the process they use.

They take a fluid sample from someone, and then they add several other fluids, including gentimicin, which is toxic to kidney cells, and then they spread the mixture on monkey kidney cells ("vero cells"), and then the kidney cells break down (due to the toxins added), and then they use an electron microscope (NOT a regular microscope), to take pictures.

An electron microscope takes PICTURES. You do not look into it to "see stuff."

The pictures produced by the electron micoscope shows debris, which are left over particles from the breakdown of the kidney cells.

Virologists then CLAIM that those particules (which is what you are referring to) are "the virus," when in fact there is NO EVIDENCE that it is. It is nothing more than an UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIM. ZERO "science" to back it up. ZERO.

Thos 20-400 nm particules you mentioned are from PHOTOS and ASSUMED to be a virus.

In fact, they are nothing more than cellular debris from the PROCESS they use.

This has now been proven, scientifically, by virologist Stefan Lanka and his team, in April 2021.

Viruses can be seen with several microscopic techniques. They range in size from 20-400 nm.

That is false.

Virologists have never seen a virus in a microscope. Never.

You do not understand the process they use.

They take a fluid sample from someone, and then they add several other fluids, including gentimicin, which is toxic to kidney cells, and then they spread the mixture on monkey kidney cells ("viro cells"), and then the kidney cells break down (due to the toxins added), and then they use an electron microscope (NOT a regular microscope), to take pictures.

An electron microscope takes PICTURES. You do not look into it to "see stuff."

The pictures produced by the electron micoscope shows debris, which are left over particles from the breakdown of the kidney cells.

Virologists then CLAIM that those particules (which is what you are referring to) are "the virus," when in fact there is NO EVIDENCE that it is. It is nothing more than an UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIM. ZERO "science" to back it up. ZERO.

Thos 20-400 nm particules you mentioned are from PHOTOS and ASSUMED to be a virus.

In fact, they are nothing more than cellular debris from the PROCESS they use.

This has now been proven, scientifically, by virologist Stefan Lanka and his team, in April 2021.

Viruses can be seen with several microscopic techniques. They range in size from 20-400 nm.

That is false.

Virologists have never seen a virus in a microscope. Never.

You do not understand the process they use.

They take a fluid sample from someone, and then they add several other fluids, including genomycin, which is toxic to kidney cells, and then they spread the mixture on monkey kidney cells ("viro cells"), and then the kidney cells break down (due to the toxins added), and then they use an electron microscope (NOT a regular microscope), to take pictures.

An electron microscope takes PICTURES. You do not look into it to "see stuff."

The pictures produced by the electron micoscope shows debris, which are left over particles from the breakdown of the kidney cells.

Virologists then CLAIM that those particules (which is what you are referring to) are "the virus," when in fact there is NO EVIDENCE that it is. It is nothing more than an UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIM. ZERO "science" to back it up. ZERO.

Thos 20-400 nm particules you mentioned are from PHOTOS and ASSUMED to be a virus.

In fact, they are nothing more than cellular debris from the PROCESS they use.

This has now been proven, scientifically, by virologist Stefan Lanka and his team, in April 2021.