Thanks Toxic. Thanks for the encouraging words, fren.

Perhaps some pedes are unable to distinguish between being a grammarnazee on one hand, and being a language analyst on the other.

There's nothing really wrong with being bad at grammar. Ultimately, the question is, am I able to articulate and communicate my thoughts, ideas, emotions, intentions, effectively. If that's accomplished, bad grammar, etc, linguistic 'rules', are not that relevant.

However, HOW a person uses language and what kind of dialects, habits, grammar, etc they use does reveal information that can be used to good effect, both to (sometimes) help improve effectiveness of communication, or, as in this case, to identify questions about the author.

The text here reads like some larp on 4chan wrote this up. That's all I'm saying. So, without ANY sauce reference or context provided by the OP, I'm wondering what's going on here.

Edit: I frequently enter typos when posting on GAW. Heaps.

Thanks Toxic. Thanks for the encouraging words, fren.

Perhaps some pedes are unable to distinguish between being a grammarnazee on one hand, and being a language analyst on the other.

There's nothing really wrong with being bad at grammar. Ultimately, the question is, am I able to articulate and communicate my thoughts, ideas, emotions, intentions, effectively. If that's accomplished, bad grammar, etc, linguistic 'rules', are not that relevant.

However, HOW a person uses language and what kind of dialects, habits, grammar, etc they use does reveal information that can be used to good effect, both to (sometimes) help improve effectiveness of communication, or, as in this case, to identify questions about the author.

The text here reads like some larp on 4chan wrote this up. That's all I'm saying. So, without ANY sauce reference or context provided by the OP, I'm wondering what's going on here.

Thanks Toxic. Thanks for the encouraging words, fren.

Perhaps some pedes are unable to distinguish between being a grammarnazee on one hand, and being a language analyst on the other.

There's nothing really wrong with being bad at grammar. Ultimately, the question is, am I able to articulate and communicate my thoughts, ideas, emotions, intentions, effectively. If that's accomplished, bad grammar, etc, linguistic 'rules', are not that relevant.

However, HOW a person uses language and what kind of dialects, habits, grammar, etc they use does reveal information that can be used to good effect, boht to (sometimes) help improve effectiveness of communication, or, as in this case, to identify questions about the author.

The text here reads like some larp on 4chan wrote this up. That's all I'm saying. So, without ANY sauce reference or context provided by the OP, I'm wondering what's going on here.